Literature DB >> 33732434

IMPORTANCE trial: a provisional study-design of a single-center, phase II, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, 4-week study to compare the efficacy and safety of intranasal esketamine in chronic opioid refractory pain.

Mauricio Fernandes1, Magdalena Schelotto2, Philipp Maximilian Doldi1,3, Giovanna Milani4, Abul Andrés Ariza Manzano5, Doriam Perera Valdivia6, Alexandra Marie Winter Matos7, Yasmin Hamdy Abdelrahim8, Shaza Ahmed Hamad Bek9, Benito K Benitez10, Vanessa Luiza Romanelli Tavares11, Abdulrahim M Basendwah12, Luis Henrique Albuquerque Sousa13, Naiara Faria Xavier14, Tania Zertuche Maldonado15, Sarah Toyomi de Oliveira16, Melisa Chaker17, Michelle Menon Miyake18, Elif Uygur Kucukseymen19, Kinza Waqar20, Ola M J Alkhozondar21, Ricardo Bernardo da Silva22, Guilhermo Droppelmann23, Antonio Vaz de Macedo24, Rui Nakamura24, Felipe Fregni24.   

Abstract

Background:  Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally. Up to 86% of advanced cancer patients experience significant pain, while 10-20% live in chronic pain. Besides, increasing prescription of opioids resulted in 33,000 deaths in the US in 2015. Both reduce patients' functional status and quality of life. While cancer survival rates are increasing, therapeutic options for chronic opioid refractory pain are still limited. Esketamine is the s-enantiomer of ketamine, with superior analgesic effect and less psychotomimetic side effects. Intranasal esketamine was approved by the FDA for treatment-resistant depression. However, its use in chronic cancer pain has never been tested. Therefore, we propose a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal esketamine in chronic opioid refractory cancer pain. Methods and analysis: We will recruit 120 subjects with chronic opioid refractory pain, defined as pain lasting more than 3 months despite optimal therapy with high dose opioids (>60 mg morphine equivalent dose/day) and optimal adjuvant therapy. Subjects will be randomized into two groups: intranasal esketamine (56mg) and placebo. Treatment will be administered twice a week for four consecutive weeks. The primary outcome is defined as reduction in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) after first application. Secondary outcomes include NPRS reduction after four weeks, the number of daily morphine rescue doses, functional status and satisfaction, and depression.
Conclusion: This study may extend therapeutic options in patients with chronic pain, thus improving their quality of life and reducing opioid use. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT04666623. Registered on 14 December 2020. Copyright:
© 2021 Fernandes M et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer pain; Esketamine; Opioid refractory; Pain measurement

Year:  2021        PMID: 33732434      PMCID: PMC7885290          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.27809.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


  39 in total

1.  Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials.

Authors:  Lawrence V Rubinstein; Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin; Sally Hunsberger; S Percy Ivy; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Missing data handling in chronic pain trials.

Authors:  Yongman Kim
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 3.  Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care: recommendations of an Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care.

Authors:  Augusto Caraceni; Nathan Cherny; Robin Fainsinger; Stein Kaasa; Philippe Poulain; Lukas Radbruch; Franco De Conno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Smaller sample sizes for phase II trials based on exact tests with actual error rates by trading-off their nominal levels of significance and power.

Authors:  I Khan; S-J Sarker; A Hackshaw
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Peter M Fayers; Dagny F Haugen; Augusto Caraceni; Geoffrey W Hanks; Jon H Loge; Robin Fainsinger; Nina Aass; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Unsupervised cluster analysis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp using routinely available clinical markers and its implication in treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Jeong-Whun Kim; Gene Huh; Chae-Seo Rhee; Chul Hee Lee; Jaebong Lee; Jin-Hang Chung; Sung-Woo Cho
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 7.  Ketamine: A Review of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Anesthesia and Pain Therapy.

Authors:  Marko A Peltoniemi; Nora M Hagelberg; Klaus T Olkkola; Teijo I Saari
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Establishing a data monitoring committee for clinical trials.

Authors:  Julia Y Lin; Ying Lu
Journal:  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02

9.  OxMaR: open source free software for online minimization and randomization for clinical trials.

Authors:  Christopher A O'Callaghan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain--United States, 2016.

Authors:  Deborah Dowell; Tamara M Haegerich; Roger Chou
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.