Yan Yan1, Heya Qian2, Ying Cao1, Tao Zhu3. 1. Department of Pharmacology, The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu 215600, P.R. China. 2. Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu 215600, P.R. China. 3. Department of Laboratory, The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu 215600, P.R. China.
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide, and its poor prognosis represents a major challenge in the clinical setting, although the incidence of GC has declined in developing countries due to the successful reduction of H. pyloriinfection (1–3). Approximately half of all patients with gastric tumors are diagnosed at an advanced stage in western countries (4), when palliative chemotherapies may be the only therapeutic option (5,6). In addition, multiple treatments have not only failed to improve the outcomes of GC but may also cause severe side effects (6). For example, combinations of two chemo drugs are recommended to treat advanced GC but have more side effects, including increased chance of infection, fatigue and shortness of breath (7,8). Thus, novel drug candidates that exert potent anti-GC effects are urgently required.There is a well-established association between inflammation and cancer (9). In 1863, Virchow observed a ‘lymphoreticular infiltrate’ in the tumor site and proposed a potential association between inflammation and cancer (10). Over the past decades, it has become widely accepted that inflammation plays a key role in tumorigenesis and certain underlying molecular mechanisms have been described (10,11). For example, inflammation may induce carcinogenesis by promoting angiogenesis and proliferation of tumor cells or causing DNA damage (12). Inflammation associated with tumor progression is caused by a variety of immune cells, including T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils and macrophages (13). Nuclear factor (NF)-κB is one of the key factors driving inflammation in immune cells (14). In the tumor microenvironment, NF-κB is activated by various stimuli, including pro-inflammatory cytokines, cellular and environmental stresses, as well as DNA damage (15). Activated NF-κB stimulates tumor growth and metastasis by promoting cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis, thus preventing cell apoptosis and remodeling tumor metabolism (14,15). Therefore, inhibition of NF-κB appears to be a promising approach to cancer treatment.Bay11-7082 is a known inhibitor of NF-κB that acts by blocking tumor necrosis factor-α-induced IκB phosphorylation (16). Previous studies have demonstrated that treatment with Bay11-7082 exerts antitumor effects on different types of cancer, including bladder, breast, esophageal and lung cancers (17–19). However, to the best of our knowledge, only a limited number of studies have investigated the antitumor activity of Bay11-7082 in GC. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the antitumor effects of Bay11-7082 on GC and elucidate its underlying molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, the present study investigated whether the effects of Bay11-7082 are mediated via inhibition of GLI Family Zinc Finger 1 (Gli1), which acts as an oncogene in GC (20).
Materials and methods
Cell lines and cell culture
MKN45 cells were purchased from Fuheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (https://www.fudancell.com), while HGC cells were purchased from Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd. All cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Tianhang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., http://zjthsw.foodmate.net), 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 100 IU/ml penicillin (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), at 37°C with 5% CO2.
MTT assay
The effect of Bay11-7082 on the proliferation of MKN45 and HGC27 cells was assessed via the MTT assay. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 5×104 cells/well and cultured overnight at 37°C. Following incubation, different concentrations of Bay11-7082 (0.01, 0.10, 1.00, 10.00 and 20.00 µM) were added into each well and incubated for 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively. Subsequently, MTT solution (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was added into each well and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Following the MTT incubation, the purple formazan crystals were dissolved using dimethyl and cell proliferation was subsequently analyzed at a wavelength of 450 nm.The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated based on the percentage of cell proliferation (vehicle-treated cells were considered as 100% viable).
Wound healing assay
Following treatment with 10 nM Bay11-7082 for 72 h, the wound healing assay was performed. Briefly, HGC27 or MKN45 cells were incubated in serum-free medium in the presence of mitomycin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, 1 µg/ml) for 1 h at 37°C. Once the cells reached 90% confluence, the monolayers were scratched using 200 µl pipette tips, and cells were washed with serum-free medium to remove cell debris. Subsequently, cells were cultured for another 24 h at 37°C and cell migration was observed under a confocal microscope (magnification, ×100; Nikon 80i, Nikon Corporation).
Cell invasion
The cell invasion assay was performed using a 24-well Transwell chamber, which includes a membrane filter (3.0 µm) and inserts coated with 200 mg/ml Matrigel and dried overnight at 37°C under sterile conditions. Cells (1×104) were plated in the upper chambers of Transwell plates in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium, while RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS was plated in the lower chambers. Following incubation for 24 h at 37°C, the invasive cells were fixed with 4% polyoxymethylene at 25°C for 30 min and subsequently stained with crystal violet (0.5% v/v in ethanol) at 25°C for 5 min. Stained cells were counted using a confocal microscope (magnification, ×200; Nikon 80i, Nikon Corporation).
Reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q) PCR
The RNA extraction kit (BioTeke Corporation) was used to extract RNA from MKN45 and HGC27 cells, according to the manufacturer's instructions. RT kit and RNase inhibitor were purchased from BioTeke Corporation. The conditions for RT were as follows: 70°C for 10 min, 25°C for 10 min, 42°C for 50 min and 80°C for 10 min. qPCR was subsequently performed using SYBR-Green Master Mix (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.). The primer sequences used for qPCR were designed by Wanlei Biotech Co., Ltd., (http://www.wanleibio.cn), and the melt curves were used to analyze the accuracy. The following primer sequences were used: Gli1 forward, 5′- TTCCTACCAGAGTCCCAAGT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CCCTATGTGAAGCCCTATTT; p65 forward, 5′-GGGGACTACGACCTGAATG-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGGCACGATTGTCAAAGAT-3′; and β-actin forward, 5′-GGCACCCAGCACAATGAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TAGAAGCATTTGCGGTGG-3′. The following thermocycling conditions were used: 94°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 20 sec and at 40°C for 1 min 30 sec. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (21) and normalized to the internal reference gene GAPDH.
Western blotting
Total protein was extracted from MKN45 and HGC27 cells, as previously described (22). Briefly, a cold RIPA buffer (Wanlei Biotech Co., Ltd.) containing protease inhibitor was used to lyse the cells. Subsequently, the extraction buffer was centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C to remove the sample debris and other insoluble materials. Total protein was quantified via the BCA protein assay (Biosharp Life Sciences) (23) and 40 µg protein/lane was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. The separated proteins were subsequently transferred onto PVDF membranes and blocked with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 2 h. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against NF-κB p65 (1:500; cat. no. WL01980), phosphorylated (p)-NF-κB p65 (1:500; cat. no. WL02169) and Gli1 (1:3,000; cat. no. 66905-1-lg) overnight at 4°C (all purchased from Wanlei Biotech Co., Ltd.). Following the primary incubation, membranes were incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary IgG antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:5,000; cat. no. WLA023) at 37°C for 45 min. β-actin was used as the internal control (1:1,000, WL01845). The Biorad Gel Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) was used to detect the expression levels of the target genes.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare differences between the control and Bay11-7082-treated groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Cytotoxic effects of Bay11-7082 on HGC27 and MKN45 cells
The cytotoxic effects of Bay11-7082 on HGC27 and MKN45 cells were first determined. As presented in Fig. 1, treatment with Bay11-7082 markedly suppressed the proliferation of HGC27 and MKN45 cells. Furthermore, Bay11-7082 inhibited the proliferation of GC cells in dose- and time-dependent manners. The IC50 values of Bay11-7082 in HGC27 cells at 24, 48 and 72 h were 24.88, 6.72 and 4.23 nM, respectively (Fig. 1A-C). The IC50 values of Bay11-7082 in MKN45 cells at 24, 48 and 72 h were 29.11, 11.22 and 5.88 nM (Fig. 1D-F). Based on these results, 10 nM Bay11-7082 was selected for further mechanistic studies.
Figure 1.
Bay11-7082 inhibits the proliferation of HGC27 and MKN45 cells. (A-C) HGC27 cells were treated with different concentrations of Bay11-7082 for 24, 48 and 72 h, and cell proliferation was assessed via the MTT assay. (D-F) MKN45 cells were treated with different concentrations of Bay11-7082 for 24, 48 and 72 h, and cell proliferation was assessed via the MTT assay. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=3). IC50, half-maximal inhibitory concentration; OD, optical density.
Bay11-7082 suppresses the migratory and invasive abilities of HGC27 and MKN45 cells
The effect of Bay11-7082 on the migration of HGC27 and MKN45 cells was assessed via the wound healing assay. The results demonstrated that treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly decreased the migratory ability of HGC27 cells compared with the control group (P<0.01; Fig. 2A and B). Similarly, treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly decreased the migratory ability of MKN45 cells compared with the control group (P<0.01; Fig. 2C and D).
Figure 2.
Bay11-7082 inhibits the migration of HGC27 and MKN45 cells. The wound healing assay was performed to assess the migratory ability of (A and B) HGC27 and (C and D) MKN45 cells following treatment with 10 nM Bay11-7082 for 24 h. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=3). **P<0.01 vs. control.
The effect of Bay11-7082 on HGC27 and MKN45 cell invasion was also determined
As presented in Fig. 3A, treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly decreased the number of invasive HGC27 cells compared with the control group (P<0.0001). Similarly, treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly decreased the numbers of invasive MKN45 cells compared with the control group (P<0.001; Fig. 3B).
Figure 3.
Bay11-7082 inhibits the invasive ability of HGC27 and MKN45 cells. (A) The Transwell assay was performed to assess the invasive ability of (A) HGC27 and (B) MKN45 cells following treatment with 10 nM Bay11-7082 for 24 h. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=3). ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001 vs. control.
Bay11-7082 inhibits Gli1 mRNA and protein expression levels in HGC27 and MKN45 cells
The molecular mechanisms underlying the inhibitory effects of Bay11-7082 on HGC27 and MKN45 cells were investigated. First, the effects of Bay11-7082 on Gli1 and p65 mRNA expression levels were assessed. Notably, Bay11-7082 had no inhibitory effect on p65 mRNA expression (Fig. 4A and C). Thus, it was inferred that the inhibitory effect of Bay11-7082 on NF-κB was exerted at the post-transcriptional level. As expected, the results demonstrated that treatment with Bay11-7082 decreased the protein expression levels of p-NF-κB p65 in both HGC27 and MKN45 cells (Fig. 4E).
Figure 4.
Bay11-7082 inhibits Gli1 mRNA and protein expression levels in HGC27 and MKN45 cells. (A-D) Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR analysis was performed to detect the mRNA expression levels of p65 and Gli1 in HGC27 and MKN45 cells. (E) Western blot analysis was performed to detect the protein expression levels of Gli1, p-NF-κB p65 and NF-κB p65 in HGC27 and MKN45 cells. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=3). ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001 vs. control. Gli1, GLIFamily Zinc Finger 1.
The effect of Bay11-7082 on Gli1 mRNA expression was investigated
Notably, the results demonstrated that treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly inhibited Gli1 mRNA expression in HGC27 cells compared with the control group (P<0.001; Fig. 4B). Similarly, treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly suppressed Gli1 mRNA expression in MKN45 cells compared with the control group (P<0.0001; Fig. 4D). The effect of Bay11-7082 on Gli1 protein expression was also investigated. The results demonstrated that treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly suppressed Gli1 protein expression compared with the control group (Fig. 4E).
Discussion
The present study aimed to investigate the effects of Bay11-7082, a known inhibitor of NF-κB (24), on the GC cell lines, HGC27 and MKN45. The results demonstrated that treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of HGC27 and MKN45 cells. Notably, in addition to its inhibitory effects on p-NF-κB p65, Bay11-7082 also exerted inhibitory effects on Gli1, which is a well-known glioma-associated oncogene (20).NF-κB is activated by various stimuli, including pro-inflammatory cytokines, cellular and environmental stressors, and DNA damage in the tumor tissues (12). Activated NF-κB stimulates tumor growth and metastasis through a series of processes, including: i) Promoting cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis, ii) preventing cell apoptosis, and iii) remodeling the tumor metabolism (15). Thus, inhibition of NF-κB appears to be a promising approach to cancer treatment.Bay11-7082 act as an inhibitor of NF-κB (16). Previous studies have demonstrated that Bay11-7082 exerts broad inhibitory effects against prostate, esophageal, lung and colorectal cancers and lymphoma (25–29). For example, Bay11-7082 has been reported to prevent tumor growth at the primary site, as well as leukemic cell infiltration in various organs of NOG mice (24). Notably, Bay11-7082 does not exert any severe adverse effects on mice during the treatment period (30). In addition, Bay11-7082 has been used in the treatment of several other experimental diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, stress-induced gastric inflammatory damage, diabetic neuropathy and endothelin-induced lung edema (31–34). These studies have demonstrated that apart from inhibiting NF-κB, Bay11-7082 also exerts diverse effects on other signaling pathways. For example, Zhang et al (17) demonstrated that the antitumor effect of Bay11-7082 on bladder cancer is associated with its modulation of Snail signaling pathways. In addition, Zhang et al (18) reported that Bay11-7082 also regulates apoptosis-related genes, including B-cell lymphoma (Bcl)-2 and Bcl-xL, and the expression of matrix metalloproteinases in lung cancers. However, few studies have focused on the antitumor effects of Bay11-7082 in GC (17,24). In addition, Bay11-7082 has not undergone clinical development.To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to investigate the effects of Bay11-7082 on two GC cell lines, namely HGC27 and MKN45, which are commonly used in pre-clinical studies (35,36). The HGC27 cell line was derived from a lymph node metastasis of undifferentiated GC (37), while MKN45 is a poorly differentiated humangastric adenocarcinoma cell line, which was found to be moderately metastatic (38). In the present study, parallel studies were performed on both GC cell lines to determine the effects of Bay11-7082 in GC. The results demonstrated that treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of HGC27 and MKN45 cells. Increasing evidence suggest that there is a complex interplay between NF-κB and Sonic hedgehog (SHH) (39). Cai et al (40) discovered that hedgehog signaling regulates NF-κB through the classical pathway, SHH/PTCH1/SMO/Gli1, in multiple myeloma cells. Notably, Wei et al (41) reported that NF-κB and Gli1 form a positive feedback loop in esophageal cell lines, whereas inhibition of either NF-κB or Gli1 inhibits cell migration, invasion and proliferation. The results of the present study demonstrated that Bay11-7082, in addition to inhibiting NF-κB, also regulated Gli1 expression in the HGC27 and MKN45 cells, indicating a crosstalk between NF-κB and Gli1. These results support the hypothesis that Bay11-7082 may be used as a novel therapeutic method for the treatment of GC. However, in vivo studies are required to further elucidate the antitumor activity of Bay11-7082 in GC. In addition, further studies are required to confirm the association between NF-κB and SHH in GC to support the clinical use of Bay11-7082 for the treatment of GC.Hedgehog/Gli signaling recently attracted the attention of oncologists due to its widespread oncogenic activity in a variety of humanmalignancies (42,43). Hedgehog/Gli signaling has been reported to be associated with cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis and self-renewal, making this signaling pathway a promising treatment target (44). In addition, NF-κB and the hedgehog/Gli signaling pathway has been implicated in the complex network of diverse molecular mechanisms leading to GC (45). The activation process of the human hedgehog pathway is initiated by the ligand of the hedgehog pathway, SHH, which results in entry of the nuclear factor Gli family proteins into the nucleus and initiates the regulation of downstream target genes (46). The Gli family includes three transcription factors, Gli1, Gli2 and Gli3. Gli1 is the only transcriptional activator, whereas Gli2 and Gli3 act as either positive or negative regulators (47). Thus, Gli1 expression leads to a positive feedback loop, and it acts as a constitutive activator (48).In most cases, overexpression of Gli1 is considered a symbol of hedgehog signaling pathway activation (49). Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of NF-κB inhibition on the hedgehog/Gli signaling pathway. The effect of Bay11-7082 on hedgehog gene expression was elucidated by assessing Gli1 mRNA and protein expression levels in the hedgehog signaling pathway. Notably, the results demonstrated that treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly decreased Gli1 mRNA and protein expression levels in HGC27 and MKN45 cells compared with the control group. Taken together, these results suggest that inhibition of NF-κB also affects the hedgehog/Gli signaling pathway. However, to elucidate the association between the effect of Bay11-7082 and the hedgehog pathway, SHH expression must also be investigated in prospective studies.In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that treatment with Bay11-7082 significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of HGC27 and MKN45 cells. Furthermore, the mechanistic studies revealed that Bay11-7082 exerted its anticancer effects in part by regulating NF-κB and Gli1.
Authors: Courtney L Scaife; Jinqiu Kuang; Jason C Wills; D Brad Trowbridge; Phil Gray; Bernadette M Manning; Ernst J Eichwald; Raymond A Daynes; Scott K Kuwada Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: William K K Wu; Chi H Cho; Chung W Lee; Daiming Fan; Kaichun Wu; Jun Yu; Joseph J Y Sung Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2010-05-21 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Xi Zheng; Richard L Chang; Xiao-Xing Cui; Gina Avila; Mou-Tuan Huang; Yue Liu; Ah Ng Tony Kong; Arnold B Rabson; Allan H Conney Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Arjun V Balar; Matthew D Galsky; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Thomas Powles; Daniel P Petrylak; Joaquim Bellmunt; Yohann Loriot; Andrea Necchi; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Nancy A Dawson; Michiel S van der Heijden; Robert Dreicer; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Richard W Joseph; Alexandra Drakaki; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Srikala S Sridhar; David I Quinn; Ignacio Durán; David R Shaffer; Bernhard J Eigl; Petros D Grivas; Evan Y Yu; Shi Li; Edward E Kadel; Zachary Boyd; Richard Bourgon; Priti S Hegde; Sanjeev Mariathasan; AnnChristine Thåström; Oyewale O Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Dean F Bajorin Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 79.321