| Literature DB >> 33732351 |
Chen Wang1,2, Zhi-Wen Ding3, Cheng-Gang Zheng4, Siyuan Wang5, Zhi-Heng Li1, Zi-Mu Zhang1, Jian Pan1, Jian Wang1, Chun Yang1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to measure the expression of Cochlin (COCH) and analyze its association with survival, recurrence and the benefits from adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following hepatectomy. Patients with high COCH expression levels had a poorer prognosis in terms of overall and disease-free survival rate compared with those with low COCH expression levels. Further analysis revealed that patients with low COCH expression who received TACE experienced markedly lower early recurrence rates compared with those who did not receive TACE. However, patients with high COCH expression with and without adjuvant TACE after resection experienced no difference in disease recurrence rates. The expression of COCH was found to be associated with hepatitis B virus infection, portal vein tumor thrombosis and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage in HCC. Therefore, the findings of the present study indicated that clinical detection of COCH expression may help estimate the prognosis of patients with HCC, as well as determine whether to administer TACE after surgery to prevent recurrence. Copyright: © Wang et al.Entities:
Keywords: cochlin; hepatocellular carcinoma; recurrence; survival; transarterial chemoembolization
Year: 2021 PMID: 33732351 PMCID: PMC7905559 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Patient characteristics (n=135).
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Age, years | |
| Mean ± SD | 48.8±10.294 |
| Median (range) | 49 (26–75) |
| Sex, n | |
| Male | 118 (87.4) |
| Female | 17 (12.6) |
| HBsAg, n | |
| Positive | 126 (93.3) |
| Negative | 9 (6.7) |
| Largest tumor size, cm | |
| ≤5 | 21 (15.6) |
| >5 | 114 (84.4) |
| Serum AFP, ng/ml | |
| ≤400 | 34 (25.2) |
| >400 | 101 (74.8) |
| Tumor number, n | |
| Single | 122 (90.4) |
| Multiple | 13 (9.6) |
| Portal vein tumor thrombus, n | |
| Negative | 44 (32.6) |
| Positive | 91 (67.4) |
| Tumor capsule, n | |
| Complete | 39 (28.9) |
| Incomplete | 96 (71.1) |
| BCLC stage, n | |
| A | 13 (9.6) |
| B | 31 (23) |
| C | 91 (67.4) |
| TNM stage, n | |
| I/II | 30 (22.2) |
| III/IV | 105 (77.8) |
| Adjuvant TACE, n | |
| Yes | 39 (28.9) |
| No | 96 (71.1) |
AFP, α-fetoprotein; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis.
Figure 1.COCH expression is associated with OS and DFS. (A) mRNA level of COCH in tumor tissues, adjacent non-neoplastic tissues and distant non-neoplastic tissues from 27 patients with HCC. ***P<0.05. (B) Immunohistochemical analysis of COCH in patients with HCC. (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis of OS in patients with HCC and different COCH expression levels. (D) Kaplan-Meier analysis of DFS in patients with HCC and different COCH expression levels. COCH, cochlin; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; K, tumor tissues; L, adjacent non-neoplastic tissues; N, distant non-neoplastic tissues.
Association between COCH protein expression and clinicopathological characteristics.
| COCH expression in HCC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Total, n | Low, n (%) | High, n (%) | P-value |
| Total patients | 135 | 58 (42.96) | 77 (57.03) | |
| Age, years | ||||
| ≤49 | 69 | 30 (22.22) | 39 (28.89) | 0.902 |
| >49 | 66 | 28 (20.74) | 38 (28.15) | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 118 | 49 (36.30) | 69 (51.11) | 0.374 |
| Female | 17 | 9 (0.07) | 8 (0.06) | |
| HBsAg | ||||
| Negative | 9 | 1 (0.01) | 8 (0.06) | 0.077[ |
| Positive | 126 | 57 (42.22) | 69 (51.11) | |
| Serum AFP, ng/ml | ||||
| ≤400 | 34 | 18 (13.33) | 16 (11.85) | 0.174 |
| >400 | 101 | 40 (29.63) | 61 (45.18) | |
| Largest tumor size, cm | ||||
| ≤5 | 21 | 10 (0.07) | 11 (0.08) | 0.639 |
| >5 | 114 | 48 (35.56) | 66 (48.89) | |
| Tumor capsule | ||||
| Complete | 39 | 15 (11.11) | 24 (17.78) | 0.501 |
| Incomplete | 96 | 43 (31.85) | 53 (39.26) | |
| Portal vein tumor thrombus | ||||
| Positive | 92 | 34 (25.19) | 58 (42.96) | 0.039[ |
| Negative | 43 | 24 (17.78) | 19 (14.07) | |
| Tumor number | ||||
| Single | 122 | 54 (0.40) | 68 (0.50) | 0.350 |
| Multiple | 13 | 4 (0.03) | 9 (0.07) | |
| BCLC stage | ||||
| A | 13 | 8 (0.06) | 5 (0.04) | 0.049[ |
| B | 31 | 16 (0.12) | 15 (11.11) | |
| C | 91 | 34 (21.16) | 57 (42.22) | |
| TNM stage | ||||
| I/II | 30 | 17 (12.59) | 13 (0.10) | 0.086 |
| III/IV | 105 | 41 (30.37) | 64 (47.41) | |
Value obtained using Fisher's exact test
P<0.05; AFP, α-fetoprotein; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis; COCH, cochlin; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 2.Prognostic significance of postoperative adjuvant TACE. (A) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the overall survival in patients with and without TACE. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the 5-year disease-free survival in patients with and without TACE. TACE, transarterial chemoembolization.
Figure 3.Prognostic value of COCH for postoperative adjuvant TACE efficacy. (A) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the association between adjuvant TACE therapy and OS in patients with HCC and high COCH expression. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the association between adjuvant TACE therapy and 5-year DFS in patients with HCC and high COCH expression. (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the association between adjuvant TACE therapy and OS in patients with HCC and low COCH expression. (D) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the association between adjuvant TACE therapy and 5-year DFS in patients with HCC and low COCH expression. COCH, cochlin; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of 5-year disease-free survival in patients with different COCH expression levels.
| Low COCH expression | High COCH expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | P-value |
| Univariate analysis | ||||
| Adjuvant TACE (yes vs. no) | 0.386 (0.198–0.753) | 0.005[ | 0.632 (0.365–1.093) | 0.101 |
| Age (>49 years vs. ≤49 years) | 1.429 (0.772–2.646) | 0.256 | 0.954 (0.575–1.583) | 0.857 |
| Sex (male vs. female) | 0.669 (0.263–1.704) | 0.399 | 0.821 (0.352–1.913) | 0.647 |
| HBsAg[ | 21.931 (0.016–29732.5) | 0.401 | 1.308 (0.562–3.043) | 0.534 |
| Serum AFP (>400 ng/ml vs. ≤400 ng/ml) | 1.326 (0.678–2.596) | 0.41 | 1.192 (0.640–2.222) | 0.580 |
| Largest tumor size (>5 cm vs. ≤5 cm) | 2.903 (1.124–7.497) | 0.028[ | 2.044 (0.919–4.546) | 0.080 |
| Portal vein tumor thrombus (negative vs. positive) | 1.173 (0.634–2.170) | 0.611 | 1.593 (0.869–2.919) | 0.132 |
| Tumor capsule (complete vs. incomplete) | 0.440 (0.202–0.959) | 0.039[ | 0.749 (0.430–1.303) | 0.306 |
| Tumor number (single vs. multiple) | 4.035 (1.364–11.937) | 0.012[ | 0.882 (0.401–1.942) | 0.755 |
| BCLC stage (A vs. B vs. C) | 1.292 (0.851–1.960) | 0.229 | 1.474 (0.951–2.284) | 0.083 |
| TNM (I+II vs. III+IV) | 1.513 (0.759–3.015) | 0.239 | 1.753 (0.856–3.590) | 0.125 |
| Multivariate analysis | ||||
| Adjuvant TACE (yes vs. no) | 0.4727 (0.3503–2.319) | 0.0324[ | NA | NA |
| Largest tumor size (>5 cm vs. ≤5 cm) | 2.7752 (0.4953–2.061) | 0.0393[ | NA | NA |
| Tumor capsule (complete vs. incomplete) | 0.4576 (0.4044–1.933) | 0.0532 | NA | NA |
| Tumor number (single vs. multiple) | 5.3590 (0.5713–2.939) | 0.0033[ | NA | NA |
Means HBV infection.
P<0.05. AFP, α-fetoprotein; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis; COCH, cochlin.