Literature DB >> 33732179

Cognitive Predictors of Precautionary Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Volker Thoma1, Leonardo Weiss-Cohen2, Petra Filkuková3, Peter Ayton2.   

Abstract

The attempts to mitigate the unprecedented health, economic, and social disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic are largely dependent on establishing compliance to behavioral guidelines and rules that reduce the risk of infection. Here, by conducting an online survey that tested participants' knowledge about the disease and measured demographic, attitudinal, and cognitive variables, we identify predictors of self-reported social distancing and hygiene behavior. To investigate the cognitive processes underlying health-prevention behavior in the pandemic, we co-opted the dual-process model of thinking to measure participants' propensities for automatic and intuitive thinking vs. controlled and reflective thinking. Self-reports of 17 precautionary behaviors, including regular hand washing, social distancing, and wearing a face mask, served as a dependent measure. The results of hierarchical regressions showed that age, risk-taking propensity, and concern about the pandemic predicted adoption of precautionary behavior. Variance in cognitive processes also predicted precautionary behavior: participants with higher scores for controlled thinking (measured with the Cognitive Reflection Test) reported less adherence to specific guidelines, as did respondents with a poor understanding of the infection and transmission mechanism of the COVID-19 virus. The predictive power of this model was comparable to an approach (Theory of Planned Behavior) based on attitudes to health behavior. Given these results, we propose the inclusion of measures of cognitive reflection and mental model variables in predictive models of compliance, and future studies of precautionary behavior to establish how cognitive variables are linked with people's information processing and social norms.
Copyright © 2021 Thoma, Weiss-Cohen, Filkuková and Ayton.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; cognitive failures; cognitive reflection; infection precaution; planned behavior; risk-taking

Year:  2021        PMID: 33732179      PMCID: PMC7959822          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  59 in total

1.  Medicine. Do defaults save lives?

Authors:  Eric J Johnson; Daniel Goldstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Open-Minded Cognition.

Authors:  Erika Price; Victor Ottati; Chase Wilson; Soyeon Kim
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-08-27

3.  The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks.

Authors:  Maggie E Toplak; Richard F West; Keith E Stanovich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

4.  Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.

Authors:  Arie W Kruglanski; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation.

Authors:  David G Rand; Alexander Peysakhovich; Gordon T Kraft-Todd; George E Newman; Owen Wurzbacher; Martin A Nowak; Joshua D Greene
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Katherine Baicker; Paulo S Boggio; Valerio Capraro; Aleksandra Cichocka; Mina Cikara; Molly J Crockett; Alia J Crum; Karen M Douglas; James N Druckman; John Drury; Oeindrila Dube; Naomi Ellemers; Eli J Finkel; James H Fowler; Michele Gelfand; Shihui Han; S Alexander Haslam; Jolanda Jetten; Shinobu Kitayama; Dean Mobbs; Lucy E Napper; Dominic J Packer; Gordon Pennycook; Ellen Peters; Richard E Petty; David G Rand; Stephen D Reicher; Simone Schnall; Azim Shariff; Linda J Skitka; Sandra Susan Smith; Cass R Sunstein; Nassim Tabri; Joshua A Tucker; Sander van der Linden; Paul van Lange; Kim A Weeden; Michael J A Wohl; Jamil Zaki; Sean R Zion; Robb Willer
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-04-30

7.  Performance correlates of self-reported cognitive failure and of obsessionality.

Authors:  D E Broadbent; M H Broadbent; J L Jones
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1986-11

8.  Good thinking or gut feeling? Cognitive reflection and intuition in traders, bankers and financial non-experts.

Authors:  Volker Thoma; Elliott White; Asha Panigrahi; Vanessa Strowger; Irina Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?

Authors:  Roy M Anderson; Hans Heesterbeek; Don Klinkenberg; T Déirdre Hollingsworth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates.

Authors:  D E Broadbent; P F Cooper; P FitzGerald; K R Parkes
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1982-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Scientific and Folk Theories of Viral Transmission: A Comparison of COVID-19 and the Common Cold.

Authors:  Danielle Labotka; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  The effect of habit on preventive behaviors: a two-wave longitudinal study to predict COVID-19 preventive behaviors.

Authors:  Shoji Ohtomo; Reo Kimura
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  How does information overload about COVID-19 vaccines influence individuals' vaccination intentions? The roles of cyberchondria, perceived risk, and vaccine skepticism.

Authors:  Andreawan Honora; Kai-Yu Wang; Wen-Hai Chih
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2022-01-04

4.  Spatial congruency or mismatch? Analyzing the COVID-19 potential infection risk and urban density as businesses reopen.

Authors:  Long Zhou; Sihong Li; Chaosu Li; Guoqiang Shen; Huajie Yang; Pengyu Zhu; Haoying Han; Bin Li
Journal:  Cities       Date:  2022-01-25

5.  Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; David A Broniatowski; Sarah M Edelson
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-12-13

6.  Individual risk-aversion responses tune epidemics to critical transmissibility (R = 1).

Authors:  S Manrubia; D H Zanette
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.653

7.  Adhering to COVID-19 health guidelines: A behavioral-failure perspective.

Authors:  Zohar Rusou; Irene Diamant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-02

8.  Verbal memory is associated with adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviors in community dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Deirdre M O'Shea; Jennifer D Davis; Geoffrey Tremont
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.636

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.