Literature DB >> 33732157

Block of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels by Atomoxetine in a State- and Use-dependent Manner.

Karl Josef Föhr1, Ariadni Nastos1, Michael Fauler2, Thomas Zimmer3, Bettina Jungwirth1, David Alexander Christian Messerer1.   

Abstract

Atomoxetine, a neuroactive drug, is approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is primarily known as a high affinity blocker of the noradrenaline transporter, whereby its application leads to an increased level of the corresponding neurotransmitter in different brain regions. However, the concentrations used to obtain clinical effects are much higher than those which are required to block the transporter system. Thus, off-target effects are likely to occur. In this way, we previously identified atomoxetine as blocker of NMDA receptors. As many psychotropic drugs give rise to sudden death of cardiac origin, we now tested the hypothesis whether atomoxetine also interacts with voltage-gated sodium channels of heart muscle type in clinically relevant concentrations. Electrophysiological experiments were performed by means of the patch-clamp technique at human heart muscle sodium channels (hNav1.5) heterogeneously expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. Atomoxetine inhibited sodium channels in a state- and use-dependent manner. Atomoxetine had only a weak affinity for the resting state of the hNav1.5 (Kr: ∼ 120 µM). The efficacy of atomoxetine strongly increased with membrane depolarization, indicating that the inactivated state is an important target. A hallmark of this drug was its slow interaction. By use of different experimental settings, we concluded that the interaction occurs with the slow inactivated state as well as by slow kinetics with the fast-inactivated state. Half-maximal effective concentrations (2-3 µM) were well within the concentration range found in plasma of treated patients. Atomoxetine also interacted with the open channel. However, the interaction was not fast enough to accelerate the time constant of fast inactivation. Nevertheless, when using the inactivation-deficient hNav1.5_I408W_L409C_A410W mutant, we found that the persistent late current was blocked half maximal at about 3 µM atomoxetine. The interaction most probably occurred via the local anesthetic binding site. Atomoxetine inhibited sodium channels at a similar concentration as it is used for the treatment of ADHD. Due to its slow interaction and by inhibiting the late current, it potentially exerts antiarrhythmic properties.
Copyright © 2021 Föhr, Nastos, Fauler, Zimmer, Jungwirth and Messerer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antiarrhythmic; atomoxetine; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; cardiotoxicity; hNav1.5; patch clamp

Year:  2021        PMID: 33732157      PMCID: PMC7959846          DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.622489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pharmacol        ISSN: 1663-9812            Impact factor:   5.810


  36 in total

1.  The mechanism of activity-dependent sodium channel inhibition by the antidepressants fluoxetine and desipramine.

Authors:  N Lenkey; R Karoly; J P Kiss; B K Szasz; E S Vizi; A Mike
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  Fluoxetine blocks Nav1.5 channels via a mechanism similar to that of class 1 antiarrhythmics.

Authors:  Hugo Poulin; Iva Bruhova; Quadiri Timour; Olivier Theriault; Jean-Martin Beaulieu; Dominique Frassati; Mohamed Chahine
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Inhibition of G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels by the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors atomoxetine and reboxetine.

Authors:  Toru Kobayashi; Kazuo Washiyama; Kazutaka Ikeda
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Electrophysiology and beyond: multiple roles of Na+ channel β subunits in development and disease.

Authors:  Gustavo A Patino; Lori L Isom
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Fast- or slow-inactivated state preference of Na+ channel inhibitors: a simulation and experimental study.

Authors:  Robert Karoly; Nora Lenkey; Andras O Juhasz; E Sylvester Vizi; Arpad Mike
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Characterization of lamotrigine inhibition of Na+ channels in rat hippocampal neurones.

Authors:  C C Kuo; L Lu
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Molecular mechanism for an inherited cardiac arrhythmia.

Authors:  P B Bennett; K Yazawa; N Makita; A L George
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Saturated norepinephrine transporter occupancy by atomoxetine relevant to clinical doses: a rhesus monkey study with (S,S)-[(18)F]FMeNER-D (2).

Authors:  Akihiro Takano; Balázs Gulyás; Andrea Varrone; Ralph Paul Maguire; Christer Halldin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Alternative splicing of the cardiac sodium channel creates multiple variants of mutant T1620K channels.

Authors:  Stefan Walzik; Annett Schroeter; Klaus Benndorf; Thomas Zimmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recent developments regarding voltage-gated sodium channel blockers for the treatment of inherited and acquired neuropathic pain syndromes.

Authors:  Jonathan W Theile; Theodore R Cummins
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 5.810

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Mechanism, Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Dosage Regimen of Atomoxetine for ADHD Therapy in Children: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Di Fu; Dan-Dan Wu; Hong-Li Guo; Ya-Hui Hu; Ying Xia; Xing Ji; Wei-Rong Fang; Yun-Man Li; Jing Xu; Feng Chen; Qian-Qi Liu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  There is no F in APC: Using physiological fluoride-free solutions for high throughput automated patch clamp experiments.

Authors:  Markus Rapedius; Alison Obergrussberger; Edward S A Humphries; Stephanie Scholz; Ilka Rinke-Weiss; Tom A Goetze; Nina Brinkwirth; Maria Giustina Rotordam; Tim Strassmaier; Aaron Randolph; Søren Friis; Aiste Liutkute; Fitzwilliam Seibertz; Niels Voigt; Niels Fertig
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.261

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.