Literature DB >> 33732131

Robotic Assessment of Wrist Proprioception During Kinaesthetic Perturbations: A Neuroergonomic Approach.

Erika D'Antonio1, Elisa Galofaro1,2, Jacopo Zenzeri3, Fabrizio Patané4, Jürgen Konczak5, Maura Casadio2, Lorenzo Masia1,6.   

Abstract

Position sense refers to an aspect of proprioception crucial for motor control and learning. The onset of neurological diseases can damage such sensory afference, with consequent motor disorders dramatically reducing the associated recovery process. In regular clinical practice, assessment of proprioceptive deficits is run by means of clinical scales which do not provide quantitative measurements. However, existing robotic solutions usually do not involve multi-joint movements but are mostly applied to a single proximal or distal joint. The present work provides a testing paradigm for assessing proprioception during coordinated multi-joint distal movements and in presence of kinaesthetic perturbations: we evaluated healthy subjects' ability to match proprioceptive targets along two of the three wrist's degrees of freedom, flexion/extension and abduction/adduction. By introducing rotations along the pronation/supination axis not involved in the matching task, we tested two experimental conditions, which differed in terms of the temporal imposition of the external perturbation: in the first one, the disturbance was provided after the presentation of the proprioceptive target, while in the second one, the rotation of the pronation/ supination axis was imposed during the proprioceptive target presentation. We investigated if (i) the amplitude of the perturbation along the pronation/supination would lead to proprioceptive miscalibration; (ii) the encoding of proprioceptive target, would be influenced by the presentation sequence between the target itself and the rotational disturbance. Eighteen participants were tested by means of a haptic neuroergonomic wrist device: our findings provided evidence that the order of disturbance presentation does not alter proprioceptive acuity. Yet, a further effect has been noticed: proprioception is highly anisotropic and dependent on perturbation amplitude. Unexpectedly, the configuration of the forearm highly influences sensory feedbacks, and significantly alters subjects' performance in matching the proprioceptive targets, defining portions of the wrist workspace where kinaesthetic and proprioceptive acuity are more sensitive. This finding may suggest solutions and applications in multiple fields: from general haptics where, knowing how wrist configuration influences proprioception, might suggest new neuroergonomic solutions in device design, to clinical evaluation after neurological damage, where accurately assessing proprioceptive deficits can dramatically complement regular therapy for a better prediction of the recovery path.
Copyright © 2021 D'Antonio, Galofaro, Zenzeri, Patané, Konczak, Casadio and Masia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; motor control; multi-joint; proprioception; robotic assessment; static perturbation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33732131      PMCID: PMC7958920          DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.640551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurorobot        ISSN: 1662-5218            Impact factor:   2.650


  37 in total

1.  Dynamic proprioceptive target matching behavior in the upper limb: effects of speed, task difficulty and arm/hemisphere asymmetries.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex.

Authors:  L H Snyder; K L Grieve; P Brotchie; R A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force.

Authors:  Uwe Proske; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Robot-aided developmental assessment of wrist proprioception in children.

Authors:  Francesca Marini; Valentina Squeri; Pietro Morasso; Claudio Campus; Jürgen Konczak; Lorenzo Masia
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  The effect of supination and pronation on wrist range of motion.

Authors:  Patrick M Kane; Bryan G Vopat; Christopher Got; Kaveh Mansuripur; Edward Akelman
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2014-08

6.  The architecture of the connective tissue in the musculoskeletal system-an often overlooked functional parameter as to proprioception in the locomotor apparatus.

Authors:  Jaap van der Wal
Journal:  Int J Ther Massage Bodywork       Date:  2009-12-07

Review 7.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  A robotic test of proprioception within the hemiparetic arm post-stroke.

Authors:  Lucia Simo; Lior Botzer; Claude Ghez; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton.

Authors:  George Mochizuki; Andrew Centen; Myles Resnick; Catherine Lowrey; Sean P Dukelow; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.