| Literature DB >> 33732068 |
Alexandr Basov1,2, Liliya Fedulova3, Ekaterina Vasilevskaya3, Ekaterina Trofimova4, Nataliya Murashova4, Stepan Dzhimak2,3.
Abstract
Influence of a new protein-peptide complex on promoting skin wound healing in male BALB/c mice was studied. Protein-peptide complex, extracted from Sus scrofa immune organs, was percutaneously administered using two methods: by lecithin gel-like liquid crystals and by liquid microemulsion. On the fifth day, wound closure in mice with a linear wound model become faster in group (less 2 days comparison to other ones), which was treated with lecithin liquid crystals carrying the protein-peptide complex. This promoting healing can be caused by resorption of bioactive high-molecular compounds the animal skin. In mice with the linear wound model, the tensile strength of the scars were respectively higher both in mice, treated using lecithin liquid crystals with protein-peptide complex, and in mice, treated using microemulsion containing protein-peptide complex, by 215.4% and 161.5% relative to the animals, which did not receive bioactive substances for wound treatment. It was associated with the regeneratory effects of tissue- and species-specific protein-peptide complexes, including α-thymosin Sus scrofa (C3VVV8_PIG, m/z 3802.8) and other factors, which were described as parts of the new extracted complex. This reveals that percutaneous administration of the complex reliably activates local regenerative processes in animals.Entities:
Keywords: BALB/c mice; Protein-peptide complex; Skin regeneration; Wound healing
Year: 2020 PMID: 33732068 PMCID: PMC7938156 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.12.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Changes in scar tensiometric parameters of wounds treated percutaneously in mice. * is p-value < 0.05 compared to the group W; # is p-value < 0.05 compared to the group A; ^ is p-value < 0.05 compared to the group B; ¤ is p-value < 0.05 compared to the group C; ~ is p-value < 0.05 compared to the group D; group W is the reference group; A group consists of mice with the wound model, treated with 0.5 cm3 methyluracil ointment (n = 10); B group consists of mice with the wound model, treated using lecithin liquid crystals (n = 9); C group consists of mice with the wound model, treated using lecithin liquid crystals containing the protein-peptide complex (n = 10); D group consists of mice with a wound model, receiving treatment with an LME dummy (n = 10); E group consists of mice with a wound model, receiving the protein-peptide complex via LME (n = 10).
Fig. 2H&E histology of scar tissue formation in treated wounds (a) Representative sections for each of the treatment groups. Red scale bar = 100 μm. Notes: a – group W; b – group A; c – group B; d – group C; e – group D; f – group E.
Blood results of mice received percutaneous lecithin liquid crystals.
| Parameters (median, [P25–P75]) | Group M | Group W | Group A | Group B | Group C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEU, 109/l | 6.31 | 8.01 | 6.81 | 6.09 # | 4.63 # |
| LYM, 109/l | 4.76 | 5.51 | 4.70 | 4.49 | 2.92 *, ¤ |
| Relative LYM, % | 80.6 | 69.2 * | 70.1 * | 76.9 # | 54.5 ^, # |
| GRAN, 109/l | 1.26 | 2.39 ^ | 1.94 * | 0.94 ¤ | 2.08 ^ |
| Relative GRAN, % | 17.5 | 29.8 * | 28.9 * | 22.3 # | 43.8 ^, ¤ |
| MON, 109/l | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.06 *, # | 0.05 *, ¤ | 0.05 *, # |
| Relative MON, % | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 ^, # | 1.0 ^ | 1.1 * |
| RBC, 1012/l | 10.39 | 10.03 | 10.08 | 10.54 | 9.8 |
| HGB, g/l | 168 | 165 | 145 ^,# | 146 ^, # | 147 ^, # |
| HCT, % | 48.3 | 44.4 ^ | 44.3 ^ | 44.7 ^ | 43.4 ^ |
| PLT, 109/l | 916 | 1016 | 715 ^, ¤ | 667 ^, ¤ | 905 |
| PCT, % | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.44 ^, ¤ | 0.43 ^, ¤ | 0.54 |
Note: * is p-value < 0.05 compared to the group M; ^ is p-value < 0.01 compared to the group M; # is p-value < 0.05 compared to the group W; ¤ is p-value < 0.01 compared to the group W; LEU: leukocytes; LYM: lymphocytes; GRAN: granulocytes; MON: monocytes; RBC: red blood cells; HGB: haemoglobin; HCT: haematocrit; PLT: platelets; PCT: plateletcrit.
Blood results of mice received percutaneous liquid microemulsion.
| Parameters (median, [P25–P75]) | Group M | Group W | Group D | Group E |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEU, 109/l | 6.31 | 8.01 | 8.69 | 7.54 |
| LYM, 109/l | 4.76 | 5.51 | 4.76 | 4.98 |
| Relative LYM, % | 80.6 | 69.2 * | 61.7 ^, # | 66.1 * |
| GRAN, 109/l | 1.26 | 2.39 ^ | 3.49 ^, # | 2.57 ^ |
| Relative GRAN, % | 17.5 | 29.8 * | 36.4 ^ | 32.7 ^ |
| MON, 109/l | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.07 |
| Relative MON, % | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| RBC, 1012/l | 10.39 | 10.03 | 9.61 | 9.78 |
| HGB, g/l | 168 | 165 | 151 *, # | 157 |
| HCT, % | 48.3 | 44.4 ^ | 40.8 ^, # | 42.7 ^ |
| PLT, 109/l | 916 | 1016 | 1064 | 944 |
| PCT, % | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.54 |
Note: * is p-value < 0.05 compared to the group M; ^ is p-value < 0.01 compared to the group M; # is p-value < 0.05 compared to the group W; LEU: leukocytes; LYM: lymphocytes; GRAN: granulocytes; MON: monocytes; RBC: red blood cells; HGB: haemoglobin; HCT: haematocrit; PLT: platelets; PCT: plateletcrit.