| Literature DB >> 33732065 |
Abstract
Insects are important for humanity; play role in crop pollination, and biocontrol of harmful pests. The red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, is a major pest of date palms and has become a serious threat. Scientists needs ample numbers of insects for bioassays to explore control options. The alga Spirulina platensis, is enriched by protein, natural vitamins, minerals, and amino acids, stimulate the development of organisms that feed on it. I assessed the value of Spirulina as a nutritional supplement for red palm weevil larvae by adding its various percentages to the artificial diet. Once a week, the larvae were removed from the containers, washed with distilled water, dried, weighed using an electronic scale, returned to a new container, and supplied with Spirulina mixed fresh diet. Larvae fed with lower concentrations showed vigorous growth and significant weight gain. Particularly, larvae fed 0.5%, 1%, and 2% Spirulina powder supplementation to their diet were healthier and gained more weight than larvae reared with >5% concentration. Overall 40% mortality was recorded in larvae fed with 10% concentration. Higher concentrations were lethal, and all larvae died within two weeks when fed 20% Spirulina. The present research findings indicate that Spirulina used in concentrations from 0.5% to below 5% had a beneficial effect on red palm weevil larval growth but a detrimental effect and even mortality was recorded when used ≥5%.Entities:
Keywords: Entomophagy; Nutrition; Red palm weevil; Spirulina
Year: 2020 PMID: 33732065 PMCID: PMC7938130 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.12.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Spirulina powder mixed with the diet displaying all the concentrations.
Fig. 2Amounts of diet given to larvae each week.
Mean weight gain (g ± SE) at the end of week-1 in red palm weevil larvae reared on Spirulina-supplemented artificial diet.
| Treatment | Weight gain (g) | ANOVA Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | |||||
| 0% | 0.010 ± 0.001c | 9 | 6.68 | 6, 62 | < 0.0001 |
| 0.5% | 0.031 ± 0.005ab | 9 | |||
| 1% | 0.028 ± 0.003b | 9 | |||
| 2% | 0.040 ± 0.002a | 9 | |||
| 5% | 0.021 ± 0.002b | 9 | |||
| 10% | 0.031 ± 0.005ab | 9 | |||
| 20% | 0.022 ± 0.003b | 9 | |||
Means followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (at P < 0.05).
Mean weight gain (g ± SE) at the end of week-2 in red palm weevil larvae reared on Spirulina-supplemented artificial diet.
| Treatment | Weight gain (g) | ANOVA Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | |||||
| 0% | 0.040 ± 0.007c | 8 | 8.92 | 6, 55 | < 0.0001 |
| 0.5% | 0.078 ± 0.014a | 8 | |||
| 1% | 0.077 ± 0.011a | 8 | |||
| 2% | 0.092 ± 0.006a | 8 | |||
| 5% | 0.044 ± 0.008bc | 8 | |||
| 10% | 0.072 ± 0.017ab | 8 | |||
| 20% | −0.00 ± 0.002d | 8 | |||
Means followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (at P < 0.05).
Mean weight gain (g ± SE) at the end of week-3 in red palm weevil larvae reared on Spirulina-supplemented artificial diet.
| Treatment | Weight gain (g) | ANOVA Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | |||||
| 0% | 0.097 ± 0.021c | 8 | 17.78 | 5, 47 | < 0.0001 |
| 0.5% | 0.383 ± 0.038a | 8 | |||
| 1% | 0.281 ± 0.025b | 8 | |||
| 2% | 0.389 ± 0.047a | 8 | |||
| 5% | 0.111 ± 0.024c | 8 | |||
| 10% | 0.103 ± 0.036c | 8 | |||
Means followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (at P < 0.05).
Mean weight gain (g ± SE) at the end of week-4 in red palm weevil larvae reared on Spirulina-supplemented artificial diet.
| Treatment | Weight gain (g) | ANOVA Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | |||||
| 0% | 0.247 ± 0.027bc | 6 | 20.99 | 5, 35 | <0.0001 |
| 0.5% | 0.389 ± 0.115b | 6 | |||
| 1% | 0.806 ± 0.057a | 6 | |||
| 2% | 0.781 ± 0.090a | 6 | |||
| 5% | 0.216 ± 0.046bc | 6 | |||
| 10% | 0.068 ± 0.030c | 6 | |||
Means followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (at P < 0.05).
Mean weight gain (g ± SE) at the end of week-5 in red palm weevil larvae reared on Spirulina-supplemented artificial diet.
| Treatment | Weight gain (g) | ANOVA Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | |||||
| 0% | 0.418 ± 0.038c | 6 | 9.85 | 5, 35 | <0.0001 |
| 0.5% | 0.721 ± 0.64ab | 6 | |||
| 1% | 0.846 ± 0.056a | 6 | |||
| 2% | 0.493 ± 0.140c | 6 | |||
| 5% | 0.618 ± 0.046bc | 6 | |||
| 10% | 0.190 ± 0.049d | 6 | |||
Means followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (at P < 0.05).
Mean weight gain (g ± SE) at the end of week-6 in red palm weevil larvae reared on Spirulina-supplemented artificial diet.
| Treatment | Weight gain (g) | ANOVA Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | |||||
| 0% | 0.892 ± 0.101a | 6 | 2.47 | 5, 35 | 0.0548 |
| 0.5% | 0.878 ± 0.143a | 6 | |||
| 1% | 0.953 ± 0.143a | 6 | |||
| 2% | 1.120 ± 0.199a | 6 | |||
| 5% | 0.873 ± 0.106a | 6 | |||
| 10% | 0.475 ± 0.082b | 6 | |||
Means followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (at P < 0.05).
Mean weight gain (g ± SE) at the end of week-7 in red palm weevil larvae reared on Spirulina-supplemented artificial diet.
| Treatment | Weight gain (g) | ANOVA Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | |||||
| 0% | 0.610 ± 0.060b | 6 | 6.72 | 5, 35 | 0.0003 |
| 0.5% | 0.246 ± 0.170c | 6 | |||
| 1% | 0.640 ± 0.084b | 6 | |||
| 2% | 0.260 ± 0.162c | 6 | |||
| 5% | 0.990 ± 0.087a | 6 | |||
| 10% | 0.885 ± 0.104ab | 6 | |||
Means followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (at P < 0.05).
Mean of total weight gain (g) throughout larval span in red palm weevil larvae reared on Spirulina-supplemented artificial diet.
| Treatment | Total weight gain (g) | ANOVA Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | |||||
| 0% | 2.33 ± 0.120 cd | 6 | 11.05 | 5, 35 | <0.0001 |
| 0.5% | 3.08 ± 0.253ab | 6 | |||
| 1% | 3.64 ± 0.165a | 6 | |||
| 2% | 3.17 ± 0.177ab | 6 | |||
| 5% | 2.87 ± 0.195bc | 6 | |||
| 10% | 1.84 ± 0.217d | 6 | |||
Means followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3Red palm weevil larval mortality (%) reared on Spirulina-supplemented artificial diet.