Literature DB >> 33732031

Experimental Therapeutic Strategies in Epilepsies Using Anti-Seizure Medications.

Fakher Rahim1, Reza Azizimalamiri2, Mehdi Sayyah3, Alireza Malayeri4,5.   

Abstract

Epilepsies are among the most common neurological problems. The disease burden in patients with epilepsy is significantly high, and epilepsy has a huge negative impact on patients' quality of life with epilepsy and their families. Anti-seizure medications are the mainstay treatment in patients with epilepsy, and around 70% of patients will ultimately control with a combination of at least two appropriately selected anti-seizure medications. However, in one-third of patients, seizures are resistant to drugs, and other measures will be needed. The primary goal in using experimental therapeutic medication strategies in patients with epilepsy is to prevent recurrent seizures and reduce the rate of traumatic events that may occur during seizures. So far, various treatments using medications have been offered for patients with epilepsies, which have been classified according to the type of epilepsy, the effectiveness of the medications, and the adverse effects. Medications such as Levetiracetam, valproic acid, and lamotrigine are at the forefront of these patients' treatment. Epilepsy surgery, neuro-stimulation, and the ketogenic diet are the main measures in patients with medication-resistant epilepsies. In this paper, we will review the therapeutic approach using anti-seizure medications in patients with epilepsy. However, it should be noted that some of these patients still do not respond to existing treatments; therefore, the limited ability of current therapies has fueled research efforts for the development of novel treatment strategies. Thus, it seems that in addition to surgical measures, we should look for more specific agents that have less adverse events and have a greater effect in stopping seizures.
© 2021 Rahim et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug strategies; epilepsy; experimental therapeutic; seizure

Year:  2021        PMID: 33732031      PMCID: PMC7959000          DOI: 10.2147/JEP.S267029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Pharmacol        ISSN: 1179-1454


Introduction

Epilepsy is one of the most important diseases of the nervous system that affects 0.5–1% of people in the community.1 Despite significant therapeutic advances in the control of epileptic seizures, in 20–30% of patients, epileptic seizures are not well controlled, and patients who are controlled with medication(s) are not free from unwanted adverse effects and its various problems.2 The symptoms of epilepsy fall in a wide range, of which some people with absence epilepsy stare for a few seconds during a seizure, while others with generalized epilepsies may experience tonic-clonic seizures.3 Epilepsy is diagnosed based on history, physical examination, and paraclinical tests, in particular, electroencephalography (EEG). Other disorders such as fainting, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, and transient ischemic attacks should be considered in the differential diagnosis; however, their treatment is different. Patients with epilepsy face many different challenges. The most significant challenges are: misdiagnosis of epilepsy in a patient who does not really have the disease misdiagnosis of epilepsy and consequently improper drug selection, refusal to accept medication by the patient, unintended adverse events of antipsychotic medications, medication resistance in the patient, measures other than medical therapy and its limitations, photosensitivity, age and epilepsy problems in children and the elderly, epilepsy and pregnancy, and sudden death in epileptic patients. In this review, we will collect and compile the treatment problems of these patients, as well as review the therapeutic approach using anti-seizure medications in patients with epilepsy.

Epidemiology and Etiology

Around 50 million people worldwide have epilepsy, but its distribution varies across countries. The prevalence of epilepsy is higher in developing countries than in developed countries. The annual incidence rate of epilepsy is between 18.9% and 19%. The estimated annual incidence is 70–40 per 100,000 person-years in developed countries and 100 per 100,000 person-years in developing countries.4 Recently, GBD 2017 US Neurological Disorders Collaborators estimated the incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (burden) of epilepsy among the 48 contiguous states and showed that eastern states had higher rates of idiopathic epilepsy.5 Similarly, Deuschl et al compared the burden of epilepsy in the EU between 1990 and 2017 with those of the WHO European region and worldwide and showed that the disease’s prevalence and burden would likely increase with the progressive ageing of the European population.6 The highest age-adjusted incidence rate is observed in children and older people. Approximately 50% of all cases of epilepsy occur both in children and in adults, and the incidence is slightly higher in men compared to women and tends to peak in the elderly.7 Indeed, the trend over the past thirty years has shown a decrease in the incidence of epilepsy in children and an increasing pattern in adults. The reason for this is not entirely clear, but the decrease in the trend in children can be due to a healthy lifestyle, better care, and increase immunization programs during pregnancy.8 During pregnancy and childbirth, these quality health care can reduce brain damage, congenital hypoxia, and viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS).9 The increased incidence of epilepsy in the elderly can be attributed to increased age-related epileptogenic conditions.10 Around 75% of the 60 million patients with epilepsy reside in resource-limited areas in developing countries with poor diagnostic services and treatment facilities.11 A large proportion of these patients may not receive appropriate treatment, which is called the “treatment gap” because there is low availability of anti-seizure medication or do not follow or adhere to the cultural, economic, or socio‐political factors.12 Researchers have linked certain types of epilepsy to genetic changes; however, it is estimated that from about 100 to more than genes may be associated with epilepsy.13 Consequently, specific genes can make a person more sensitive to environmental conditions resulting in epilepsy or trigger seizures. Traumatic brain injury (TBI), brain diseases such as tumors or strokes that lead to brain damage can also lead to epilepsy.14 Stroke is also one of the major causes of epilepsy in adults over 35 years of age. Infectious diseases such as meningitis, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and viral encephalitis can also lead to epilepsy.15,16 Neonates during prenatal period are susceptible to brain damage that can be caused by several factors, including maternal infections, malnutrition, or intermittent hypoxia.17 Finally, epilepsy can sometimes be associated with developmental disorders, such as autism and different kind of neuro-cutaneous disorders.18

Pathophysiology

All the seizures occur when a part of the brain (mainly the cortex) produces abnormal, paroxysmal, and recurrent discharges. Although seizures’ pathophysiology is different in genetic and acquired epilepsies, in all kinds of epilepsies, from genetic epilepsies to post-traumatic ones, the cortex produces these abnormal, paroxysmal, and recurrent discharges. In genetic epilepsies with the malfunctioning of voltage-gated or ligand-gated channels, the defected neurons are prone to produce abnormal discharges. In acquired epilepsies such as post-traumatic, the neurons’ environment will change in a way that reduces the threshold of neurons to produce abnormal and recurrent discharge.19 The pathophysiology of epilepsy is usually seen as an imbalance between γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) inhibitor and glutamate-stimulating neurotransmission.20 This change is due to the selective loss of GABA-ergic inhibitory neurons after deposition of epileptic insults (eg, epilepsy, stroke, and damaged brain injury) and the reorganization of neural circuits over-synchronize neural cells population. Deficiency in the signaling of GABA, and increased glutamatergic transmission, which has been reported in many types of epilepsy, are considered as the basis of epilepsy pharmacotherapy.21,22 Another mechanism is Neurotransmitters and Drug Abuse (NMDA). NMDA excessive activity triggers neurons with potentially toxic concentrations of calcium and sodium. Glutamate-NMDA interactions lead to apoptosis, which may be closely involved in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. Despite the advantages of glutamate blockage in various disorders, deficiency of the NMDA activity can be deleterious. There are many specific pathophysiologic defects leading to epilepsy at various levels of brain functions, such as neuronal network and structure, neurotransmitter receptors and synthesis, synaptic development, and ion channels Different underlying mechanisms, like altered neuronal circuits, abnormal structure of dendrites and dendritic spines, decreased GABA synthesis, abnormal GABA receptor subunits, and excess glycine lead to over-activation of NMDA receptors, and potassium channel mutations.23

Challenges of Epilepsy Treatment

Diagnostic Error

It is clinically essential to differentiate epilepsy from other conditions mimicking seizures, especially in emergencies, and there are several ways to diagnose it. One of the proposed diagnostic methods is the measurement of creatine kinase (CK) enzyme, which increased epilepsy, but it is not a specific test.24 Lahat et al found an increase in serum CK in children admitted following an episode of febrile convulsions.25 Brigo et al, in a systematic review of four studies, comprising a total of 343 cases, reported that CK could provide valuable retrospective information at the later stages of the differential diagnosis between convulsive and non-convulsive cases.26 Nass et al retrospectively studied laboratory markers of cardiac and metabolic complications after generalized tonic-clonic seizures in 223 patients of 986 screened cases, and showed that increased troponin associated with seizure is among the more frequent complications following emergency admissions.27 Dafotakis et al evaluated the serum lactate and CK levels at admission and 10–48 h after the seizure episodes, respectively, and reported that these biomarkers were significantly increased in patients with epilepsy.28 Although several studies have concluded that after seizure, various reported biomarkers increased significantly, the question arises as to whether tonic or clonic movements will cause muscle damage and, consequently, increase this biomarker. Previous studies with this background have considered different groups such as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, vasovagal syncope, and transient loss of consciousness, which are also likely to cause muscle damage in these disorders, as a control group. However, in comparison, still in the group of seizures, these biomarkers had a significant elevation.29,30 A number of studies showed that some bias exists in the diagnosis of epilepsy, which has been studied so far. Therefore, it is understood that physicians may be biased in diagnosing epilepsy; although, the studies suggest that general misdiagnosis of epilepsy may not be a rare occurrence.31 These diagnostic errors may also overshadow the global picture, as emphasized, and will be detrimental to patient care. As a result, the general misdiagnosis of epilepsy has probably been underestimated. It is a matter of recognizing important factors that may lead to such diagnostic errors.

Diagnostic Evaluation

Medical History

Epilepsy is a clinical diagnosis based on the patient’s history; so, all neurological imaging or examination and electroencephalographic findings can be normal in patients with epilepsy. Diagnosis is often difficult in patients with suspected epilepsy, and about 20% of all patients referred to diagnostic centers may incorrectly be considered as epilepsy.31,32 In most cases, the diagnosis of epilepsy is critical and depends on the description of the attack by a witness, but the accuracy and validity of this part of the diagnostic procedure are largely unknown.33 Thus, when there is structural brain damage, treatment is continued for a lifetime, and in cases, the cause of epilepsy is idiopathic (genetic), depending on the case, treatment should be given for two to five years. Therefore, before starting treatment, it is necessary to make a correct diagnosis. Although the accuracy of witness descriptions varies widely, it should be noted that it has important clinical implications. Diagnosis of epilepsy affects almost all aspects of a patient’s life, and the classification of the disease also affects the choice of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), which usually is a long-term drug therapy. Therefore, in patients who do not achieve complete seizure control, factors other than predisposing factors in the development of epileptic seizures may are responsible, which require differential diagnoses. One of the diseases is syncope, which is a temporary loss of consciousness usually related to insufficient blood flow to the brain, which should be differentially diagnosed from epilepsy according to medical history and examination.34 Other diseases, such as migraines, can cause loss of consciousness due to deficiency of minerals and nutrients, vasomotor disorders, and massive vegetative disturbances.35 Some brain damages, such as brain infections, brain tumors, and high cranial pressure, can cause loss of consciousness with or without seizures that should be differentially diagnosed from epilepsy.36 So, medical history and differential diagnosis are fundamental in the treatment choice for epilepsy.37

Neurological Examination

Diagnosis of neurological diseases, such as epilepsy, is usually based on the proper combination of patient history and neurological examination.38 Obtaining an accurate neurological examination is the most important factor in achieving a correct diagnosis and using the appropriate treatment. To diagnose epilepsy, a neurological examination is performed, which includes questions and activities to see how the body responds. A neurological examination comprises numerous procedures to diagnose epilepsy. This evaluation usually begins with a few simple questions and other mental assessment tests, which can help determine the possible brain damage. In these tests, the doctor assesses the patient’s thinking, memory, and speech skills. These tests help to determine the damaged areas of the brain and also brain’s functional capacity in patients with epilepsy.39

Electroencephalography (EEG)

This is the most commonly used test for diagnosing epilepsy, in which electrodes were attached to the scalp using adhesive-like materials and recorded the brain’s electrical activity.40 Recording seizures helps to determine the type of seizure as well as rules out other possible diseases. The doctor may recommend instructions to provoke epileptiform discharges, such as sleep deprivation shortly before the test. Bouma et al in a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis on 15 studies with a total of 1799 participants, reported the sensitivity and specificity of routine EEG after a first unprovoked seizure which were 17.3% and 94.7%, respectively.41 Gilbert et al, in a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis on 25 studies involving 4,912 EEG, showed Specificity (range 0.13 to 0.99) and sensitivity (range 0.20 to 0.91).42

Laboratory Examination

To diagnose this condition, the physician will review the symptoms and medical history of a person and perform several tests to diagnose epilepsy and determine the cause of the seizures.43 The first diagnostic method is a neurological examination in which the doctor may examine behavior, motor ability, mental function, and other areas to diagnose the disease and determine the type of epilepsy.44 Blood tests may also be done to check for signs of infection, genetic predisposition, or other seizure-related illnesses. Most of the diagnostic accuracy studies showed relatively low sensitivity and high specificity for laboratory biomarkers in patients with epilepsy (Table 1). Thus, laboratory tests have a low ability to correctly identify those patients with epilepsy and a relatively high ability to identify those patients without the disease precisely.45 Among various laboratory biomarkers, prolactin had sensitivity and specificity of 47–93% and 74–98.2%, respectively, while creatine kinase had sensitivity and specificity of 19–87.5% and 86.7–100%. Consequently, ammonia showed sensitivity and specificity of 53–55% and 90–100%, respectively. Though these findings suggest that these laboratory biomarkers’ serum level increases after an epileptic seizure, they can be used to detect epilepsy. They are not a useful method for the differentiation of different forms of epileptic seizures.46,47
Table 1

Overview of Studies Investigating Elevations of Various Laboratory Biomarkers in Patient with GTCS

Author, YearPopulationAgeSettingLab BiomarkerSensitivitySpecificity
Ehsan, 199614950 (13 GTCS)6–61ProspectiveProlactin76.9%85.7%
Alving, 199815058 (16 GTCS)13–68ProspectiveProlactin93%74%
Shah et al, 200115189 (36 GTCS)18–62ProspectiveProlactin47%98.2%
Willert et al, 20042960 GTCS18–62ProspectiveCreatine kinase19%100%
Chen et al, 200530Pooled analysis—–Meta-analysisProlactin60%95.9%
Holtkamp et al, 200615216 GTCS18–77RetrospectiveCreatine kinase87.5%87.5%
Goksu et al, 200915363 (26 GTCS)16–78ProspectiveCreatine kinase34.6%89.2%
Yanagawa et al, 200715416 GTCS7–81ProspectiveCreatine kinase40%86.7%
Liu et al, 201015531 GTCS>18ProspectiveAmmonia (NH3)54.8%100%
Tomita et al, 2011156207 GTCS>16RetrospectiveAmmonia (NH3)53%90%
Overview of Studies Investigating Elevations of Various Laboratory Biomarkers in Patient with GTCS

Imaging

Imaging is central to the assessment of patients with epilepsy and has dramatically modified their management.

Computed Tomography Scan (CT Scan)

CT-scans use X-rays to create a cross-sectional image of the brain. This imaging technique can detect brain abnormalities, such as tumors, bleeding, and cysts, leading to seizures.40

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI uses strong radio and magnetic waves to evaluate and record the details of the brain. The doctor may be able to diagnose injuries or abnormalities in the brain that can cause seizures.48

Functional MRI (fMRI)

fMRI measures the amount of changes in blood flow that occur inactive parts of the brain. Prior to surgery, physicians can use fMRI to pinpoint the exact location of vital functions, such as speaking and moving (eloquent cortex), which prevents the surgeon from damaging these sites during surgery of epileptic patients.49

Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

PET scans use low-dose radioactive material that enters a vein and helps identify active areas of the brain as well as diagnose abnormalities.50

Single Proton Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)

This test is mainly used when MRI and EEG have not been able to detect the source of seizures in the brain.51 The SPECT test uses a small amount of radioactive material that is infused into a vein and provides a detailed three-dimensional map of blood flow activity in the brain during a seizure. Physicians may also perform a type of SPECT test in addition to magnetic resonance imaging (called SISCOM), which provides more detail and may lead to the detection of epileptogenic lesion or zone.

Genetic Testing

A new study shows that common genetic testing can diagnose epilepsy in children with seizures. Genetic testing should be included in the initial assessment of young children with epilepsy, and through the detection of the type of epilepsy helps to choose the most effective treatment to control the disease.52 According to the researchers, genetic information helps identify which drugs may help treat the disease and which drugs should be avoided.53,54 Recent researches showed that genetic testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) provided a diagnosis in 14.9–24.4% of individuals with epilepsy.55 Sánchez Fernández et al, in a meta-analysis, compared the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies involving 3 different genetic tests, including chromosomal microarray (CMA), epilepsy panel (EP) with deletion/duplication testing, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) in patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology. They showed that WES and EP are the most cost-effective genetic tests for epilepsy.56 Although genetic testing is expensive and difficult to obtain, in some kind of epilepsies may result in a definitive diagnosis and may also help choose the most appropriate medication.

Epilepsy Treatment Methods

Various treatment modalities for adequate seizure control in patients with epilepsy, include anti-seizure medications (ASMs), surgical procedures, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and ketogenic diet (high fat and low carbohydrate diet). More than 70% of patients with epilepsy are controlled with AEDs.57 These agents prevent seizures but do not cure epilepsy. Several types of medication that are used in a person depend on the type of seizure. In a small group of patients, especially those with focal epilepsy as well as generalized ones, surgery may be helpful.58 VNS is a relatively new treatment for epilepsy and helps reduce the number, duration, and severity of seizures.59 In this method, the left vagus nerve will be stimulated using slight electrical discharges. This method does not cure the person, and the person often needs to repeat this treatment. For children whose seizures are not controlled by medication, another way to help is to use a ketogenic diet (high fat and low carbohydrate diet).60

Prevention and Control Measures in Epilepsy

Epilepsy has primary and secondary causes, which are caused by various reasons such as drowning, swallowing a foreign body, brain damage, central nervous system infections, road accidents, etc. and cause It is possible for a child who is living in normal conditions and with good genetics to become an epileptic child. Epilepsy due to secondary factors is preventable; therefore, taking hygienic measures such as washing hands, taking care not to transmit infections, and maintaining the body’s immunity could be effective in people’s health against epilepsy.61–65 Prevention of the known causes of epilepsy most likely includes prevention of birth trauma, central nervous system (CNS) infection in children, cerebrovascular disease in adults, and alcohol and heroin abuse. In most patients with anthrax, proper use of AEDs can prevent recurrence of seizures or premature death. At least 70% of patients with a single seizure do not have a recurrence and should not be considered as patients with epilepsy.66 Most people treated for epilepsy (70% to 80%) will not experience more seizures while using medication(s), and up to 70% of children in this group will not have seizures even after stopping medication.67 Patients with recurrent seizures who have been treated for 5 years and children with mental retardation or cerebral palsy are less likely to outgrow seizures.68 Epilepsy must be diagnosed and treated in a timely manner; therefore, the disease should etiologically observe in order to reach a proper diagnosis and treatment, and then use drugs that had the least adverse events and maximum efficacy to control this disease.69 In a meta-analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials on preventive methods against sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), Maguire et al found only very low-quality evidence of a preventative effect for nocturnal supervision.70 SUDEP is defined a sudden, unexpected death, non-traumatic or non-drowning in people with epilepsy, with or without evidence of epileptic seizures, and no other cause for death during post-mortem examination. SUDEP is the most common cause of death associated with epilepsy, with about 1 to 2 deaths per 1,000 patients per year; so, overall, the risk of SUDEP is more than 20 times higher than that in the general population.71 Recurrent seizures, male gender, young age at the first seizure, prolonged duration of epilepsy, and multiple AEDs are thought to increase the risk of SUDEP. The exact cause of SUDEP is currently unknown; however, it is thought to be associated with heart failure, respiratory problems, and brain damage following seizure.72 Ryvlin et al, in a meta-analysis pooling data from 112 randomised placebo-controlled trials in patients with refractory epilepsy, showed that SUDEP was significantly less common in the patients receiving efficacious AEDs than in the placebo group.73 Later on, Hesdorffer et al, in a meta-analysis of combined data from the three case–control studies alongside data on the frequency of GTCS and AED therapy, showed that not a single drug of the AEDs was associated with increased SUDEP risk once GTCS occurrence was taken into account. They gave a consistent message that increases SUDEP risk is associated with increasing the number of GTCS and not AEDs.74 In another meta-analysis conducted by Hemery et al, on 72 randomized controlled trials of adjunctive AEDs, existing evidence does not support robust differences between these drugs to prevent secondary GTCS.75 Recently, in a Maguire et al, in a comprehensive and latest updated Cochrane meta-analysis on 1277 records (randomised controlled trials, cohort, case-control, and non-randomised studies) found a preventative effect for nocturnal supervision against SUDEP with a recommendation of the need for more research to pinpoint the efficacy of further interventions, such as early surgical evaluation, seizure detection devices, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), opiate and adenosine antagonists safety pillows, and educational programs to prevent SUDEP.76

Risk Factors for Epilepsy

Epilepsy is associated with various risk factors, including strongly, moderately, weakly, and probably related (Table 2).
Table 2

Modifiable Risk Factors for Epilepsy

At-Risk GroupRisk Factors
Strong (Relative Risk> 4)
InfantsAnoxic
Congenital anomalies
Structural abnormalities of the brain
ChildrenMental retardation
Cerebral palsy
Central nervous system infection
AdultsModerate to severe brain injury
ElderlyCerebrovascular disease
Moderate (Relative Risk 4–2)
AdultsChronic alcohol and heroin use
Weak (Relative Risk <2)
Does not have
Probable
Immunization against pertussis
Mild brain injury
Modifiable Risk Factors for Epilepsy High-risk factors for epilepsy include anoxia (lack of oxygen) and birth trauma, congenital anomalies, structural abnormalities of the brain in infants, mental retardation, cerebral palsy (CP), CNS infections (such as bacterial meningitis and viral encephalitis) in children, moderate to severe stroke, especially in men aged 15 to 35 years, cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and Alzheimer’s disease in the elderly, 36,77 Moderate risk factors for epilepsy include a family history of epilepsy, especially in siblings, in parents or first-degree relatives,78 and brain tumors and surgeries in any age group, multiple sclerosis (MS),79 and chronic alcohol or heroin abuse.80 Suspected risk factors include febrile seizures in children (maybe because of genetic predisposition in some kind of epilepsies that begin with febrile seizures), harmful events around birth without CP, immunity against whooping cough (pertussis), mild head trauma, and non-purulent meningitis.81

Selection of Medication Based on the Type of Epilepsy

Knowing the type of epilepsy is the first indicator for choosing an appropriate AEDs. Some types of epilepsy are controlled with certain medications. Ethosuximide, for example, can only inhibit small primary epilepsy, while it may aggravate seizure.82 Phenytoin and vigabatrin may also implicate in worsening of seizures, specially generalized type.83 Therefore, the purpose of controlling epilepsy with medication is to prescribe AEDs suitable for the type of epilepsy. Problems in this area can be categorized as follows: In most cases, when seizures are happening, the doctor will often not present, especially a neurologist, and should be commented based on the patient or companion’s descriptions. It should be borne in mind that the patient or companions may not pay attention to certain conditions and may not be able to describe the patient’s condition and epileptic seizures properly adequately.

Pharmacological Treatment

The treatment process usually starts with medication. If medications do not cure the disease, therapist may suggest surgery or other treatments. Most people with epilepsy are treated with anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Taking medicines in some patients reduces the frequency and severity of seizures. Therapist will advise the patient on when to stop taking medicine. More than half of children with epilepsy who no longer experience epilepsy-related symptoms even after stopping medication can spend the rest of their lives without medication. Many adults can also stop taking the drug without experiencing a seizure after two or more years of life. Finding the right drug and dosage is a complex task. Therapist will consider patient’s condition, frequency of seizures, age, and other factors when choosing medication. Physicians may also review other medications you are taking to ensure these medications do not interfere with anti-seizure medication. The doctor will first prescribe a low-dose drug and gradually increase the dose until the seizures are properly controlled. AEDs are associated with adverse events.84 Mild adverse events include fatigue, dizziness, weight gain, decreased bone mass density (BMD), eczema, ataxia, dysphonia, and lethargy. More severe but rare adverse events include depression, suicidal ideation, self-injurious behaviors, severe eczema, and organ-specific inflammatory response. At least half of newly diagnosed patients recovered from seizures when they received their fist medication.

Older vs Newer Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)

The efficacy and adverse effects of AEDs may vary between new and old drugs.85 Newer AEDs, defined here arbitrarily as those coming on the market after introducing carbamazepine (1993–2019), may have advantages over older drugs (Figure 1). Patients who are well controlled with older AEDs are sometimes shifted to newer AEDs because they are more desirable in terms of long-term adverse events, ie, less prevalent neurological adverse reactions, less frequent osteoporosis, and better immunity during pregnancy.86 However, there is a serious concern that the efficacy of newer AEDs, both for new-onset epilepsy and chronic refractory epilepsy, is not better than that of older drugs.87
Figure 1

Illustration of old vs new, as well as the first to third generation of anti-epilepsy drugs.

Illustration of old vs new, as well as the first to third generation of anti-epilepsy drugs.

Anti-Epilepsy Drugs (AEDs)

AEDs suppress the abnormal activity of neurons called epileptic discharges, which is a limited period of abnormal discharge of brain neurons. Three mechanisms of AEDs action have been proposed so far, including modulation of sodium, calcium, or potassium-dependent voltage channels, increased synaptic pathway by GABA, and reduced glutamate-induced stimulation (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Different mechanisms of AEDs action.

Different mechanisms of AEDs action. Because AEDs are often used for a long time, it is important to consider their pharmacokinetic properties to avoid adverse events and drug interactions. In the case of some of these drugs (such as phenytoin), achieving optimal therapeutic goals requires determining the blood level and drug clearance.88 AEDs are generally well absorbed orally and have good bioavailability. Most AEDs, except gabapentin and vigabatrin, have a hepatic metabolism; also, some of these drugs are converted to active liver metabolites. AEDs resistance may result from an increase in drug delivery in the blood-brain barrier (BBB) region.89 Blood concentrations of AEDs may reach toxic and dangerous levels in the presence of drugs that inhibit the metabolism of these drugs or drugs that cause them to separate from plasma protein binding sites.90 On the other hand, drugs that are involved in inducing hepatic metabolizing enzymes (such as rifampin) reduce the blood levels of these drugs to the point that they are no longer sufficient to control seizures. Many anticonvulsant drugs themselves are able to stimulate the hepatic metabolism of drugs. The most important of these are carbamazepine and phenytoin.91 Identifying specific types of epilepsy is very important for prescribing appropriate AEDs (or a combination of drugs). The choice of drug is usually made based on its known beneficial effects on the specific type of epilepsy diagnosed, the patient’s prior response, and adverse events of the drug. Treatment usually involves a combination of medications and the addition of effective medications if previous medications are not enough.92 Long-term therapy with AEDs in women is associated with certain adverse events, which the most important of these complications is teratogenicity.93 Children born to mothers taking anticonvulsant drugs during pregnancy are at increased risk for congenital disabilities.94 Neural tube defects (NTD) have been shown to be highly associated with valproic acid intake.95 Carbamazepine is known to cause cranial and facial abnormalities and spina bifida, and a fetal hydration syndrome (FHS) has been described in pregnant women after taking phenytoin.96

Voltage-Dependent Sodium Channel Blockers

This class of AEDs includes phenytoin, carbamazepine, zonisamide, and lamotrigine. These agents block voltage-dependent sodium channels in neuronal membranes.

Phenytoin

Phenytoin is used to control all types of epilepsy except myoclonic seizures, trigeminal neuralgia, epilepsia partialis continua, cardiac arrhythmias, and to accelerate wound healing (topically). It exerts its anticonvulsant effect at therapeutic concentrations by blocking sodium channels and inhibiting repetitive action potential. Phenytoin also inhibits the release of serotonin and norepinephrine and affects other neurotransmitters’ concentration.97 Phenytoin-induced adverse events include nausea, vomiting, disturbance of consciousness, dizziness, headache, tremor, irritability, insomnia, rarely dyskinesia, peripheral neuropathy, imbalance, impaired speech, constant and involuntary movements of the eyes back and forth, blurred vision, skin rash, enlargement facial combination, hair loss, acne, fever and hepatitis, arrhythmias, skin necrosis, lymphadenopathy and gingival hypertrophy.98

Carbamazepine

Carbamazepine is prescribed to treat certain conditions such as neurological pain (trigeminal neuralgia, diabetic neuropathy), epilepsy (focal and non-primary generalized), and bipolar disorder. Carbamazepine is an anticonvulsant that reduces nerve tics that cause pain and seizures. This drug is one of the AEDs that is used for behavioral and stress disorders.99 Carbamazepine-induced adverse events include dizziness, lethargy, difficult balancing and walking, nausea, vomiting, irregular heartbeat, shortness of breath, liver problems, and fainting.100

Topiramate

Topiramate is an anticonvulsant, which is used to treat seizures in adults and children. Extended-release topiramate is used in adults and children six years of age and older. Topiramate is a type of AEDs that is prescribed to control seizures and migraines. Topiramate helps control seizures by reducing the abnormal electrical current in brain cells. The exact anticonvulsant mechanism and other topiramate effects are not yet well known; however, preclinical studies have identified four characteristics that may be related to the effect of topiramate for epilepsy.101 Electrophysiological and biochemical evidence shows that topiramate inhibits voltage-dependent sodium channels in a concentration-dependent manner, increases the neurotransmitter activity of gamma aminobutyrate in some GABA-A receptor subtypes, antagonizes AMPA/kainate subgroup of glutamate receptor, and inhibits the carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzyme, especially isozymes II and IV.102,103 Adverse events of topiramate include nausea and vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, paresthesia, cognitive impairment, headache, dizziness, ataxia, drowsiness, weakness, blurred vision, diplopia, nystagmus, loss of appetite, weight loss, kidney stones, osteomalacia. Rare adverse events include metabolic acidosis, hyperthermia, acute glaucoma, oligohydrosis, and bone marrow failure.104

Lamotrigine

It is an AED or anticonvulsant drug. This drug is used alone and sometimes combined with other drugs to treat epileptic seizures in adults and children older than 2 years. It is also used to reduce psychological attacks in adults with bipolar disorder. Lamotrigine may be used for purposes other than those used in these cases. Indications: This drug is used to treat focal seizures and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. It may have adverse events, such as dizziness, lightheadedness, drowsiness, nausea, blurred vision, weight loss, weakness, etc., which are not very dangerous and may gradually become addictive.105,106 However, skin-elated adverse events of this drug, although rare, can be hazardous and the patient needs to be vigilant and careful about it. This condition, known as Stevens–Johnson syndrome, manifests itself in the form of skin blemishes and rashes, fever, sore throat, and cold symptoms, and progresses rapidly and affects all areas of the skin.107

Calcium Channel Blockers

This group of drugs, such as ethosuximide, valproic acid, gabapentin, and pregabalin, inhibits low-threshold calcium channels (type T).

Ethosuximide

Ethosuximide is the choice of medication in the absence of epilepsy. All medications can cause adverse events, but many consumers do not experience any adverse events when they were taking ethosuximide. In case of persistent adverse events, the doctor should be informed when symptoms, such as feeling sick, abdominal pain, headache, dizziness, fatigue and drowsiness, diarrhea, loss of appetite, restlessness, skin rash, and mood changes occur. Glauser et al, in a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial using optimal initial monotherapy of ethosuximide for 453 children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) during 12 months, reported a superior effectiveness of ethosuximide compared to other AEDs without intolerable adverse events.108 Shatara et al and Werbel et al, assessed the effect of fluoxetine, on the protective action of two commonly used AEDs, including ethosuximide (ETX) and valproate (VPA) in animal model. It should be noted that ethosuximide may cause blood disorders; although this is a very rare complication, patient needs immediate medical care if having other symptoms such as fever, mouth sores, bruising, or unexplained bleeding.109,110 Veroniki et al, in a systematic review and meta-analysis on experimental and observational studies, reported that ethosuximide (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.23–7.07) was significantly more harmful in pregnant women with epilepsy than control.111

Sodium Valproate

Sodium valproate was accidentally discovered in France in the 1960s to be useful in treating epilepsy. Today, it is used in almost all kinds of epilepsies. However, this drug is effective in all types of epilepsy. In children under three years of age, it is necessary to use this drug with caution because it sometimes causes severe liver damage.112 Some people develop low blood platelets with this drug. The most common adverse events of sodium valproate are gastrointestinal irritation, hair loss, tremors, ankle swelling, weight gain, and drowsiness, especially if taken with phenobarbital.107

Gabapentin

Gabapentin is an AED or anticonvulsant drug that acts on the chemicals and nerves that cause seizures and pain. It is used in adults to relieve nerve pain caused by the herpes virus.105

GABA-A Channel Blockers

Benzodiazepines interact with specific receptors on the GABA-A-chlorine channel receptor. Benzodiazepines can increase the frequency of chlorine channel opening and the inhibitory effect of GABA. Phenobarbital and other barbiturates increase the inhibitory effect of GABA. Vigabatrin and valproic acid irreversibly inhibit GABA aminotransferase, an important enzyme that terminates the GABA effect. GABA is a structural analogue of GABA but does not directly activate GABA receptors. Other drugs that can facilitate the inhibitory effects of GABA include Felbamate, topiramate, and valproic acid.

Diazepam

Diazepam is a sedative and hypnotic drug that is a member of the long-acting benzodiazepines family with active hepatic metabolites. Diazepam is prescribed to relieve anxiety, sleep disorders, and panic disorders. It is also used as an anticonvulsant and skeletal muscle relaxant, treatment of muscle contraction, and seizures.113 It is recommended for anxiety, alcohol withdrawal syndrome, seizure disorders, myoclonic epilepsy, treatment of panic and excessive fear, skeletal muscle spasm, headache, and involuntary shaking or tremors. The diazepam-associated complications include mental retardation, drowsiness, slurred speech, bradycardia, shortness of breath, imbalance, skin rash, sore throat, fever and shivering, and abnormal bruising or bleeding, sores inside the mouth, Jaundice, memory loss, nausea, anxiety or irritability.114

Clonazepam

Clonazepam is a benzodiazepine drug prescribed to treat various types of epilepsy and seizures in children and adults. Clonazepam controls seizures by reducing abnormal electrical activity in the brain. There are different types of seizures, depending on which cells in the brain are electrically disturbed. Symptoms that occur during a seizure can affect the muscles, senses, mood, emotions, concentration, alertness, or a combination of them. Therefore, in the treatment of epilepsy, prevention, and reduction of the number of times, seizures are the main target. Clonazepam controls the electrical activity of brain cells by controlling the symptoms of seizures and prevents seizures. It also helps reduce the severity of seizures by relaxing the muscles that contract during a seizure.115 Common adverse events of clonazepam include drowsiness, weakness, and dizziness. Concentration problems, abnormal eye movements, and forgetfulness can also occur with this medication, which you can discuss with your doctor. In children, increased salivation may cause coughing or discomfort.116

Phenobarbital

Phenobarbital is one of the oldest drugs used to treat epilepsy, discovered in 1912. It is inexpensive and effective in treating most types of epilepsy, but in recent years, control has been used because of its adverse events. Initially, phenobarbital was used as a sleeping pill.117 Therefore, it is not surprising that patients taking this drug become drowsy, although this drowsiness usually decreases over time. Conversely, in children, phenobarbital may cause them to become more active and even more aggressive. In a small number of people, phenobarbital may cause redness of the skin and blisters. Taking large amounts of this drug can cause drowsiness, impotence, depression, and poor memory. Long-term phenobarbital use can reduce the body’s storage of vitamin D and folic acid.118

Primidone

Primidone is used as a non-specific CNS depressant alone or in combination with other anticonvulsant drugs to control seizures of large refractory epilepsy and to treat focal or psychomotor seizures. The drug’s mechanism of action is unknown. Part of the drug’s activity may be due to phenobarbital (its active metabolite).119 Adverse primidone events include drowsiness, imbalance, nausea, nystagmus, visual disturbances, and skin rashes occur, especially at the beginning of treatment, and are usually reversible with continued treatment. Other adverse events of the drug include depression, mobility, restlessness, disturbed consciousness in the elderly, excessive and abnormal excitement and activity in children, and megaloblastic anemia.120

Pregabalin

Known as (CI‑1008,3‑isobutyl‑γ‑aminobutyric acid) was approved for the treatment of epileptic disorders, and targeting the calcium channel (α2-δ).121

Vigabatrin

This transaminase GABA prohibits neuronal uptake of GABA, with release into the synapse.122

Carisbamate

It was accepted in 2008 as a new drug application to the United State Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It is metabolized by glucuronidation and aliphatic side-chain oxidation.123 François et al conducted a study to observe the effect of this drug in an animal model of GTCS and reported that this drug has a superior effect on primary generalized seizures of tonic-clonic type.124

Eslicarbazepine Acetate (ESL)

Compound with anticonvulsant activity [(S)-(−)-10-acetoxy-10, 11-dihydro-5H-dibenz [b, f] azepine-5-carboxamide], a novel central nervous system (CNS)-active agent. Patients with epilepsy showed favorable response after taking this medication.125 Carreño et al, in three Phase III trials, investigated whether eslicarbazepine acetate could lead to exacerbation of seizures in patients with epilepsy or not and showed that treatment with this adjunctive does not appear to aggravate GTCS.126 In a prospective, non-interventional study on epileptic patients in 17 hospitals, demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate and reported its frequent use as monotherapy lack of severe adverse effects.127

Lacosamide

This medication has been approved to administer in patients aged four and older. This non-enzyme-inducing drug is indicated for monotherapy in focal epilepsies.128 Vossler et al conducted a Phase 3, double-blind, randomised -controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide in patients with uncontrolled GTCS and claimed that it is an effective and generally safe treatment for uncontrolled generalized seizures of tonic-clonic type.129 Schmitz et al, in a hoc analysis of a double-blind non-inferiority monotherapy trial (NCT01243177) of patients with GTCS who were received either lacosamide or carbamazepine controlled-release (carbamazepine-CR), showed that lacosamide is an effective and generally well tolerated than carbamazepine-CR.130 Gathering empirical evidence from both in vivo and in vitro studies suggests that some antiarrhythmic drugs, such as dronedarone, not only played an important role in initiating seizures but also increases the anticonvulsant potency of classical AEDs. Clinical evidence shows that the combination of dronedarone with lacosamide should be neutral from a clinical viewpoint, and a special attention is recommended for patients with GTCS because of some adverse-effects.131 In a clinical study, Abarrategui et al assessed the effect of lacosamide on refractory epilepsy and suggested that lacosamide can be a reasonable option for patients with this type of epilepsy.132

AEDs Monotherapy or Combination Therapy

So far, the clinical development trend of old and new AEDs revealed that old AEDs entered the market without any precise randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and were used simultaneously in both monotherapy and combination therapy. After years of clinical experience, monotherapy was considered the preferred treatment for newly diagnosed epilepsy, especially the drug-resistant form, followed by comparative monotherapy trials of conventional AEDs. Hence, the new AEDs were introduced after accurate RCTs of adjuvant therapy, indicating that the new AEDs were superior to placebo in adjuvant therapy. Thus, the new AEDs, after years of use in combination therapy, underwent comparative monotherapy RCTs to promote themselves as first-line drugs for patients with epilepsy, of which some were acknowledged as the drugs of choice in several specific epilepsy syndromes (Table 3).
Table 3

Available Meta-Analyses on the Use of Different AEDs Either as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Various Types of Epilepsy

Study IDNo. of StudiesPopulationType of EpilepsyDrugsStudy DesignFinal OutcomeAdverse Events OR or RD (95% CI)
Chadwick et al, 19961575507PE6 AEDs (Gabapentin, Lamotrigine, Tiagabine, Topiramate, Vigabatrin, Zonisamide)RCTs50% reduction in seizure frequencyDizziness 3.6 (1.85–7.24), fatigue 2.44 (1.16–5.14), and thinking abnormality 3.94 (1.85–8.36)
Rosenfeld et al, 19971585214PETopiramateRCTsA valuable new AED for both in epilepsyCognitive slowing and other CNS- related adverse events appeared early in treatment and decreased over time, weightreductions
Marson et al, 1997159294091RE5 AEDs (Gabapentin, Coefficient, Tiagabine, Topiramate, Vigabatrin)RCTsDrug is better at preventing seizuresDizziness1.99 (1.20–3.28), fatigue 2.52 (1.47–4.31), somnolence 2.86 (1.71–4.79), and thinking abnormal 3.95 (1.86–8.39)
Otoul et al, 200516091049RE6 AEDs (Gabapentin, Lamotrigine, Oxcarbazepine, Tiagabine, Topiramate, Zonisamide)RCTsResponder rate of topiramate (OR: 0.52 with 95% CI 0.29–0.93)——————
Sirven et al, 2007161164279PE8 AEDs (Gabapentin, Levetiracetam, Lamotrigine, Oxcarbazepine, Pregabalin, Tiagabine, Topiramate, Zonisamide)RCTsImbalance risk 3.26 (2.11–5.3)Ataxia or incoordination 3.25
Zaccara et al, 2008162364403DR-PE and DR-GE8 AEDs (Gabapentin, Lamotrigine, Levetiracetam, Oxcarbazepine, Pregabalin, Tiagabine, Topiramate, Zonisamide)RCTsA dose-effect relation was shown only for dizziness, cognitive impairment and fatigueDizziness10.06 (0.00–0.11), fatigue 0.06 (0.01–0.12), somnolence 0.09 (0.04–0.14), and Cognitive 0.14 (0.06–0.21)
Maguire et al, 200816310577RETopiramate, Levetiracetam, GabapentinFORCTs40% was the responders rate——————
Jette et al, 2008164101312DR-PETopiramateRCTsRR of 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was 2.85 (95% CI 2.27 to 3.59)Ataxia 1.95 (99% CI 1.04 to 3.65); dizziness 1.55 (99% CI 1.08–2.22); fatigue 2.19 (99% CI 1.43–3.35); nausea 2.35 (99% CI 1.28–4.29); somnolence 2.18 (99% CI 1.47–3.21) and ‘thinking abnormally’ 5.77 (99% CI 2.50–13.35)
Luykx et al, 200916541723EpilepsyTopiramateRCTsDropouts RR was 2.5 (95% CI: 2.03–2.98)——————
Tachibana et al, 2013166332363PE5 AEDs (Gabapentin, Topiramate, Levetiracetam, Pregabalin, Zonisamide)RCTsRR of patients treated 0.988 (0.982–0.994)——————
Pulman et al, 2014167111401DR-PETopiramateRCTsRR of 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was 2.97 (95% CI 2.38 to 3.72)Ataxia 2.29 (99% CI 1.10 to 4.77); concentration difficulties 7.81 (2.08 to 29.29); dizziness 1.54 (99% CI 1.07 to 2.22); fatigue 2.19 (99% CI 1.42 to 3.40); paresthesia 3.91 (1.51 to 10.12); somnolence 2.29 (99% CI 1.49 to 3.51); ‘thinking abnormally’ 5.70 (99% CI 2.26 to 14.38) and weight loss 3.47 (1.55 to 7.79)
Pulman et al, 2014167247823RE7 AEDs (Carisbamate, Perampanel, Levetiracetam, Oxcarbazepine, Pregabalin, Topiramate, Rufinamide)RCTsRR of 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was (2.33, 95% CI1.70–3.17)——————
Tan et al, 20141684262BECTS4 AEDs (Oxcarbazepine, clobazam, carbamazepine, topiramate)RCTsRR of seizure remission (1.02,95% CI of 0.8 ‐ 1.3)Proportion of participants who had adverse events, topiramate (1.7%)
Nolan et al, 2016169131151PETopiramatecarbamazepineRCTsHR adjusted for seizure 1.16 (0.98 to 1.38)The five most commonly reported adverse events were drowsiness or fatigue, ‘pins and needles’ (tingling sensation), headache, gastrointestinal disturbance, and anxiety or depression
Zhao et al, 2017170131258PE17 AEDs (Brivaracetam, Carisbamate, Eslicarbazepine acetate, Gabapentin, Lacosamide, Levetiracetam, Lamotrigine, Oxcarbazepine, Placebo, Pregabalin, Perampanel, Rufinamide, Retigabine, Tiagabine,Topiramate, Vigabatrin, Zonisamide)RCTsRR of 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was (0.44, 95% CI0.21–0.90)The five most commonly reported adverse events were drowsiness or fatigue, ‘pins and needles’ (tingling sensation), headache, gastrointestinal disturbance, and anxiety or depression
Veroniki et al, 20171119658,461Pregnant women with Epilepsy6 AEDs (Ethosuximide, valproate, topiramate, Phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine)RCTs and OSSafety analysisThe risk of congenital malformations (CMs) was (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.17–2.97)
Zhuo et al, 2017171327658RE11 AEDs (Eslicarbazepine acetate, Levetiracetam, Retigabine, Tiagabine, Perampanel, Oxcarbazepine, Topiramate, Pregabalin, Zonisamide, Gabapentin, Lamotrigine)RCTsRR of 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was (7.09, 95% CI 3.93–13.96)Dizziness 0.54 (99% CI 0.08–1.22), somnolence 0.30 (99% CI 018–1.29)
Nevitt et al, 20171727712,391GTCE4 AEDs (Levetiracetam, carbamazepine, gabapentin, phenobarbitone)RCTsHR adjusted for seizure 0.93 (0.75 to 1.15)Ataxia, concentration difficulties, dizziness, fatigue, paresthesia, somnolence, ‘thinking abnormally’ and weight loss
Hu et al, 20181737620,711RE6 AEDs (Brivaracetam, Levetiracetam, Oxcarbazepine, Topiramate, Vigabatrin, Valproate)RCTsTopiramate had a greater likelihood of allowing patients to achieve seizure freedom 9.93 (95%CI 5.54–79)Greater adverse events and withdrawal rate
Mohd-Tahir and Li, 2018174121867PE9 AEDs (Gabapentin, Lamotrigine, Levetiracetam, Oxcarbazepine, Perampanel, Stiripentol, Topiramate, Vigabatrin, Zonisamide)RCTsRR 2.15 (95% CI:1.72, 2.69), seizure-free and withdrawal rates were 1.99 (95% CI:0.72, 5.48) and 0.69 (95% CI:1.13, 2.39)High withdrawal rates
Campos et al, 2018175164702GE9 AEDs (Lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, valproate)RCTsRR of 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was (0.3, 95% CI 0.02–4.93)High withdrawal rates
Slater et al, 2018176299265RE11 AEDs (eslicarbazepine, ezogabine, gabapentin, lacosamide, levetiracetam, perampanel, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide)RCTsAEDs were more likely than placebo to achieve seizure response or freedomPatients were more likely to discontinue any AED than placebo.
Liu et al, 2019177383JMETopiramateRCTsA greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with placeboAEs associated with topiramate was moderate to severe
Lezaic et al, 2019178183206Mixed12 AEDs (brivaracetam, carbamazepine, gabapentin, lacosamide, levetiracetam, lamotrigine,perampanel, phenobarbital,phenytoin, topiramate,valproic acid, zonisamide)RCTsIn the elderly with epilepsy, lamotrigine is better tolerated——————
Nordli et al, 202017971515GTCE3 AEDs (lamotrigine, perampanel, and topiramate)RCTsThe ≥50% responder rate was similar between children and adults in a topiramate——————

Abbreviations: FORCTs, follow-on randomised controlled trials; RCTs, randomized, placebo-controlled add-on trials; RE, refractory epilepsy; PE, partial epilepsy; DR-PE, drug-resistant partial epilepsies; DR-GE, drug-resistant generalized epilepsies; BECTS, benign Epilepsy with centro temporal spikes; OS, observational study; RR, responder rate; HR, hazard ratio; OS, observational studies; GTCE, generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy; GE, generalized epilepsies; AEs, adverse events; JME, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Available Meta-Analyses on the Use of Different AEDs Either as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Various Types of Epilepsy Abbreviations: FORCTs, follow-on randomised controlled trials; RCTs, randomized, placebo-controlled add-on trials; RE, refractory epilepsy; PE, partial epilepsy; DR-PE, drug-resistant partial epilepsies; DR-GE, drug-resistant generalized epilepsies; BECTS, benign Epilepsy with centro temporal spikes; OS, observational study; RR, responder rate; HR, hazard ratio; OS, observational studies; GTCE, generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy; GE, generalized epilepsies; AEs, adverse events; JME, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Challenges in Epilepsy Treatment During Pregnancy

Seizure-associated diseases such as epilepsy affect approximately 0.5% to 1% of the general population and pregnant women. Most women with epilepsy have an accident-free pregnancy. The effect of pregnancy on the frequency of epileptic attacks can be variable. According to various sources, 15% to 50% of patients have an increase in seizure frequency during pregnancy, and a decrease in seizure frequency occurs in approximately 25% of patients, while a significant percentage of women do not experience a change in seizure frequency during pregnancy.133 In a systematic review study of 59 studies performed on 65,533 pregnant women with epilepsy, in 24% of patients, an increase in the frequency of attacks, in 23% of patients a decrease in the frequency of attacks, and in 53% of patients no change in the frequency of attacks was observed.134 The patient’s age, type of seizure, AEDs regimen, or frequency of seizures in the prenatal period cannot predict possible seizure frequency changes for a pregnant woman.135

The Effect of Endo-Cannabinoids Inhibitors

In recent years, many efforts have been made to find new treatments for epilepsy. Anandamides and diarchidonyl glycerol are two main and important ligands of the endo-cannabinoid system, of which each produced and deleted through specific enzyme pathways.136,137 The presence of these compounds in the neuronal environment and at the site of synaptic communication can cause modulatory effects on these cells’ properties and performance.138,139 Most anandamides are produced by N-acyl-phosphatidylethanolamine-phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD) enzymes inside the cell and then transported to the extracellular space. The fatty-acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) enzyme is responsible for metabolizing and removing accumulated anandamides.140 Considering the abundance and importance of these two endo-cannabinoid ligands and the main pathways mentioned in their synthesis and removal, it seems that by pharmacological manipulation in these pathways, the level of these two main ligands in the brain can be changed. In a study, the use of monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) enzyme inhibitor, which is involved in the breakdown of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), increased seizure frequency;141 while, in another study, the use of the alpha-beta hydrolase domain (ABHD) enzyme inhibitor, which is also involved in the breakdown of 2-AG, improved seizure rates.142 The results of a study showed that systemic injection of both enzymes involved in 2-AG deletion can significantly reduce the seizure, and the time delay in reaching stages 4 and 5 of seizures increased significantly. In addition, the incidence of stage 5 of seizure and the percentage of deaths due to seizures were significantly reduced by this injection.143 Recent studies have shown the effectiveness of plant cannabinoids in controlling the occurrence of epileptic seizures in laboratory models.144–146 In a study, systemic application of a herbal cannabinoid in two pilocarpine-induced seizure models and a penicillin-induced seizure model significantly reduced the incidence of stages 4 and 5 of epilepsy.147 In another study on the seizure model, laboratory-produced phytocannabinoid compounds significantly reduced the severity of seizures and post-seizure mortality.148

Ongoing Trials

The search terms were “treatment,” “therapy” OR “Drug” OR “antiepileptic drugs” OR “AEDs” AND “generalized tonic-clonic seizure” OR “Epilepsy” on ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP search portal and resulted in 187 active trials, with 42 trials specific to epilepsy as of September 23, 2020. Of these 187 trials, approximately 42 trials (including those not yet recruiting, recruiting, active, or completed) included pharmacological therapy to treat epilepsy in adult patients (Table 4). Of these 42 trials, 37 are interventional studies, with 29 placebo-controlled trials, and 5 were about using devices such as Hövding inflatable helmet and Brain Sentinel Seizure Detection Device and Warning System (BSSDD-WS). Per description of the studies, there are 7 Phase IV, 26 Phase III, 5 Phase II, and 4 Phase I trials.
Table 4

Summary of the Unpublished and Ongoing Clinical Studies on the Therapeutic Role of Various Experimental Drugs in Generalized Tonic-Clonic Epilepsy

RowStatusStudy TitleConditionsInterventionsLocations
1Completed Has ResultsA Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability Trial of Pregabalin as Add-On Treatment in Pediatric and Adult Subjects With Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (ie, Grand Mal) Seizures.

Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures

Drug: Pregabalin

Drug: Placebo

United States
2Active, not recruiting Has ResultsPerampanel as Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatrics With Partial Onset Seizures or Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures

Partial-Onset or Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Drug: Perampanel

United States
3Completed Has ResultsA Efficacy and Safety Study of Adjunctive Perampanel in Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures

Seizure Disorder Generalized Tonic Clonic

Drug: Perampanel

Drug: Placebo comparator

4Completed Has ResultsAn Open Label Study of L059 (Levetiracetam) in Japanese Epilepsy Subjects with Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Epilepsy

Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Drug: Levetiracetam

Japan
5CompletedInvestigation of the Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Treatment With Fycompa Tablets in Adult Epilepsy Patients With Partial-onset Seizures (With or Without Secondary Generalized Seizures) or Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Partial Seizures (With or Without Secondary Generalized Seizures)

Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Drug: Fycompa

Japan
6Active, not recruitingInvestigation of the Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Treatment With Fycompa Tablets in Adolescence Epilepsy Patients With Partial-onset Seizures (With or Without Secondary Generalized Seizures) or Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Partial Seizures (With or Without Secondary Generalized Seizures)

Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Drug: Fycompa

Japan
7Completed Has ResultsA Study of Levetiracetam in Japanese Pediatric Patients With Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Epilepsy

Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Drug: Levetiracetam

Japan
8Completed Has ResultsA Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Levetiracetam in Epilepsy Patients With Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures (Except Partial Seizures Evolving to Secondarily Generalized Seizures)

Epilepsy

Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Drug: Levetiracetam

Drug: Placebo

China
9CompletedDetecting Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures With a Seizure Detection and Warning System in Epilepsy Patients

Epilepsy

Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Device: Brain Sentinel Seizure Detection and Warning System

United States
10Completed Has ResultsA 12-Month Study To Evaluate The Safety And Tolerability Of Pregabalin As Add-On Therapy In Pediatric Subjects 1 Month To 16 Years Of Age With Partial Onset Seizures And Pediatric And Adult Subjects 5 To 65 Years Of Age With Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Epilepsy, Partial Seizures

Epilepsy, Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Drug: Pregabalin

United States
11Active, not recruitingStudy to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel as Monotherapy or First Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Partial Onset Seizures With or Without Secondarily Generalized Seizures or With Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Partial Onset Seizures

Secondarily Generalized Seizures

Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Drug: Perampanel

United States
12Enrolling by invitationCenobamate Open-Label Extension Study for YKP3089C025

Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures in the Setting of Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy

Drug: Cenobamate

United States
13CompletedSeizure Detection and Warning System in Epilepsy Patients

Epilepsy

Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Device: Brain Sentinel Seizure Detection and Warning System

United States
14Completed Has ResultsOpen-Label Study to Assess Lacosamide Safety as Add-on Therapy for Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Epilepsy

Epilepsy

Drug: Lacosamide

United States
15RecruitingA Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Perampanel as Only Add-on Treatment in Participants With Primary or Secondarily Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Seizures

Drug: Perampanel

Germany
16Completed Has ResultsOpen-Label Extension Study to Assess the Safety and Seizure Frequency Associated With Lacosamide for Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Epilepsy

Epilepsy

Drug: Lacosamide

United States
17CompletedTreatment Of Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures With An Investigational New Drug

Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic

Drug: lamotrigine

United States
18CompletedLevetiracetam Versus Valproate in Idiopathic Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Epilepsy, Idiopathic Generalized

Drug: Levetiracetam

Drug: Valproate

Iran,Islamic Republic of
19Not yet recruitingAssessment of the Emfit Mattress Sensor for Detection and Alarm of Night-time Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures.

Epilepsy

Seizures

Device: Emfit mattress sensor

United States
20Completed Has ResultsStudy Evaluating LAMICTAL Extended-Release Therapy Added To Current Seizure Treatments In Patients With Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures (PGTC) Seizures

Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic

Drug: lamotrigine

Drug: Placebo

United States
21No longer availableCompassionate Use Program With Lacosamide in Patients With Partial-onset or Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Epilepsies, Partial

Drug: Lacosamide

22Not yet recruitingA Study to Investigate Dosage, Effectiveness, and Safety of Perampanel When Used as First Add-on Therapy in Participants ≥12 Years With Partial Onset Seizures With or Without Secondary Generalization or With Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Associated With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy

Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy

Partial Onset Seizures

Generalised Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Drug: Perampanel

Denmark
23CompletedA Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Topiramate in Epilepsy Patients With Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Epilepsy

Seizures

Drug: topiramate

24CompletedA Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Topiramate as “Add on” Treatment in Epilepsy Patients With Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Epilepsy

Seizures

Drug: topiramate

25CompletedStudy to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Levetiracetam in Patients Suffering From Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy With Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

Generalized Convulsive Epilepsy

Drug: Levetiracetam

26AvailableAn Extended Access Program (EAP) for Perampanel

Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic or Partial Onset Seizures

Lennox Gastaut Syndrome

Drug: Perampanel

Chile
27CompletedA Study of Intravenous Perampanel in Japanese Participants With Epilepsy

Epilepsy

Seizures

Drug: Perampanel

Japan
28CompletedStudy to Investigate Dosage, Efficacy, and Safety of Perampanel Given as Monotherapy in Patients With Epilepsy

Epilepsy

Partial-Onset Seizures

Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Other: No treatment (intervention) was administered

29Active, not recruitingSafety and Efficacy of Lacosamide as Additional Therapy in Patients Suffering From Epileptic Tonic Clonic Seizures

Epilepsy

Drug: Lacosamide Tablet

Drug: Lasosamide Oral Solution

United States
30Completed Has ResultsA Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Lacosamide Versus Placebo (a Pill Without Active Medication) in Patients With Idiopathic Generalised Epilepsy Who Are Already Taking Anti-epileptic Medications

Epilepsy

Drug: Lacosamide Tablet

Drug: Lasosamide Oral Solution

Other: Placebo Tablet

Other: Placebo Oral Solution

United States
31Active, not recruitingSeizure Detection and Warning System for Epilepsy Patients

Epilepsy

Device: Brain Sentinel Seizure Detection Device and Warning System

United States
32Completed Has ResultsEvaluating Long Term Safety of Lacosamide (LCM) to Carbamazepine Controlled-release (CBZ-CR); Initial Monotherapy in Epilepsy Subjects 16 Years and Older

Epilepsy

Monotherapy

Drug: Lacosamide

Drug: Carbamazepine-Controlled Release (CBZ-CR)

United States
33CompletedMonotherapy With Levetiracetam in Newly Diagnosed Patients Suffering From Epilepsy

Generalized Epilepsy

Drug: LEVETIRACETAM

34Completed Has ResultsTrial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide (LCM) to Carbamazepine Controlled-Release (CBZ-CR); Initial Monotherapy in Epilepsy; Subjects Aged 16 and Older

Epilepsy

Monotherapy

Drug: Lacosamide

Drug: Carbamazepine-Controlled Release

United States
35CompletedAn Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of RWJ 333,369 in Patients With Epilepsy

Epilepsy

Epilepsies, Partial

Drug: RWJ 333,369:

36Unknown Impact of Early Lactate Dosage Compared to CK for Diagnosis of a Suspected Seizure

Epileptic Seizure

Creatine Kinase

Lactate

Epileptic Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizure

Diagnostic Test: CK and Lactate dosages

France
37CompletedNovel Helmet Design in Patients With Seizures

Drug Resistant Epilepsy

Drop Seizures

Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizure

(and 2 more…)

Device: Hövding inflatable helmet

United States
38RecruitingRandomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Cenobamate Adjunctive Therapy in PGTC Seizures

Primary Generalized Epilepsy

Drug: Cenobamate

Drug: Placebo

United States
39CompletedA Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Topiramate and Phenytoin in Patients With New Onset Epilepsy Requiring Rapid Initiation of Antiepileptic Drug Treatment

Epilepsy

Drug: topiramate, phenytoin

40CompletedStudy of Antiepileptic Drug in Generalised Convulsive Status Epilepticus

Status; Epilepticus, Tonic-clonic

Drug: Levetiracetam/Clonazepam

Drug: Clonazepam/Placebo levetiracetam IV

France
41Terminated Has ResultsAdjunctive Zonisamide in Primary Generalised Tonic Clonic Seizures

Epilepsy

Drug: Zonisamide

Drug: Placebo

Australia
42CompletedTopiramate Bioequivalence Study Brazil - Fast

Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic

Drug: Topiramate coated tablet

Drug: Topamax® coated tablet

Brazil
Summary of the Unpublished and Ongoing Clinical Studies on the Therapeutic Role of Various Experimental Drugs in Generalized Tonic-Clonic Epilepsy Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures Drug: Pregabalin Drug: Placebo Partial-Onset or Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Drug: Perampanel Seizure Disorder Generalized Tonic Clonic Drug: Perampanel Drug: Placebo comparator Epilepsy Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures Drug: Levetiracetam Partial Seizures (With or Without Secondary Generalized Seizures) Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures Drug: Fycompa Partial Seizures (With or Without Secondary Generalized Seizures) Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures Drug: Fycompa Epilepsy Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures Drug: Levetiracetam Epilepsy Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Drug: Levetiracetam Drug: Placebo Epilepsy Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Device: Brain Sentinel Seizure Detection and Warning System Epilepsy, Partial Seizures Epilepsy, Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Drug: Pregabalin Partial Onset Seizures Secondarily Generalized Seizures Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Drug: Perampanel Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures in the Setting of Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy Drug: Cenobamate Epilepsy Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Device: Brain Sentinel Seizure Detection and Warning System Epilepsy Drug: Lacosamide Seizures Drug: Perampanel Epilepsy Drug: Lacosamide Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic Drug: lamotrigine Epilepsy, Idiopathic Generalized Drug: Levetiracetam Drug: Valproate Epilepsy Seizures Device: Emfit mattress sensor Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic Drug: lamotrigine Drug: Placebo Epilepsies, Partial Drug: Lacosamide Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy Partial Onset Seizures Generalised Tonic-Clonic Seizures Drug: Perampanel Epilepsy Seizures Drug: topiramate Epilepsy Seizures Drug: topiramate Generalized Convulsive Epilepsy Drug: Levetiracetam Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic or Partial Onset Seizures Lennox Gastaut Syndrome Drug: Perampanel Epilepsy Seizures Drug: Perampanel Epilepsy Partial-Onset Seizures Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Other: No treatment (intervention) was administered Epilepsy Drug: Lacosamide Tablet Drug: Lasosamide Oral Solution Epilepsy Drug: Lacosamide Tablet Drug: Lasosamide Oral Solution Other: Placebo Tablet Other: Placebo Oral Solution Epilepsy Device: Brain Sentinel Seizure Detection Device and Warning System Epilepsy Monotherapy Drug: Lacosamide Drug: Carbamazepine-Controlled Release (CBZ-CR) Generalized Epilepsy Drug: LEVETIRACETAM Epilepsy Monotherapy Drug: Lacosamide Drug: Carbamazepine-Controlled Release Epilepsy Epilepsies, Partial Drug: RWJ 333,369: Epileptic Seizure Creatine Kinase Lactate Epileptic Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizure Diagnostic Test: CK and Lactate dosages Drug Resistant Epilepsy Drop Seizures Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizure (and 2 more…) Device: Hövding inflatable helmet Primary Generalized Epilepsy Drug: Cenobamate Drug: Placebo Epilepsy Drug: topiramate, phenytoin Status; Epilepticus, Tonic-clonic Drug: Levetiracetam/Clonazepam Drug: Clonazepam/Placebo levetiracetam IV Epilepsy Drug: Zonisamide Drug: Placebo Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic Drug: Topiramate coated tablet Drug: Topamax® coated tablet

Limitations

This review has several limitations to note. First, the published evidence is derived solely from observational studies or small-size clinical trials (less than 250 patients), which may introduce high risks of bias or imprecision about the treatment effect. Second, our review focused on a wide range of patient’s age, and the data may not be applicable to specific age group populations. Fourth, the articles were published in English-language or translations, so relevant international data could be lacking.

Conclusions

The primary goal in using experimental therapeutic drug strategies in patients with epilepsy is to prevent recurrent seizures and reduce the rate of traumatic events that may occur during seizures. With the right AEDs treatment regimen, about 70% of people with epilepsy do not experience the seizures again. However, about one-third of people with epilepsy still has seizures despite taking several AEDs. Continued seizures put patients at risk for SUDEP and may be associated with depression and lower quality of life. Strategies to try to prevent SUDEP include reducing the rate of seizures (by considering epilepsy surgery or lifestyle changes), monitoring heart and respiratory problems during and after seizures, monitoring patients at night, or using pillows to prevent respiratory problems. Drugs that increase the brain chemical serotonin and decrease the brain chemicals adenosine and opioids may also help prevent respiratory problems. We can also greatly reduce these people’s learning disabilities, especially in school-age, through the prevention of recurrent seizures and disruptions in daily activities. So far, various drug treatments have been offered for patients with epilepsy, which have been classified according to the type of epilepsy, the effectiveness of the drugs and adverse events. Drugs such as levetiracetam, valproic acid, and lamotrigine are at the forefront of these patients’ treatment. In resistant form of epilepsy, neuro-stimulation by intra-cerebral electrodes has also been suggested. The variety and sample size of clinical trials launched to investigate potential therapies for epilepsy highlight both the need and capability to produce high-quality evidence. However, it should be noted that some of these patients still do not respond to existing treatments; therefore, it seems that we should look for more specific drugs that have fewer adverse events and have a greater effect in stopping seizures.
  166 in total

Review 1.  Epilepsy: A Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Joseph I Sirven
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  The Epidemiology of Epilepsy.

Authors:  Ettore Beghi
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of antiepileptic drugs for refractory partial-onset epilepsy: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qingting Hu; Fang Zhang; Wenhui Teng; Fangfang Hao; Jing Zhang; Mingxiao Yin; Naidong Wang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Carisbamate (RWJ-333369).

Authors:  Gerald P Novak; Michael Kelley; Peter Zannikos; Brian Klein
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 5.  The neuropathology of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ann C Mckee; Daniel H Daneshvar
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2015

6.  Serum neuron-specific enolase, prolactin, and creatine kinase after epileptic and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.

Authors:  C Willert; C Spitzer; S Kusserow; U Runge
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.209

Review 7.  Psychiatric comorbidity, health, and function in epilepsy.

Authors:  Frank Gilliam; Hrvoje Hecimovic; Yvette Sheline
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 8.  Epilepsy in older people.

Authors:  Arjune Sen; Nathalie Jette; Masud Husain; Josemir W Sander
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.

Authors:  Rajul Parikh; Annie Mathai; Shefali Parikh; G Chandra Sekhar; Ravi Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Treatments for the prevention of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP).

Authors:  Melissa J Maguire; Cerian F Jackson; Anthony G Marson; Sarah J Nevitt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.