Cal Robinson1,2, Erin Hessey3, Sophia Nunes1, Marc Dorais4, Rahul Chanchlani5,6,7, Jacques Lacroix8, Philippe Jouvet8, Veronique Phan9, Michael Zappitelli10. 1. Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 4. StatScience Inc., Notre-Dame-de-l'Île-Perrot, QC, Canada. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 6. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 7. ICES McMaster, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 8. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Critical Care Division, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada. 9. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada. 10. Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. michael.zappitelli@sickkids.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have characterized follow-up after pediatric acute kidney injury (AKI). Our aim was to describe outpatient AKI follow-up after pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission. METHODS: Two-center retrospective cohort study (0-18 years; PICU survivors (2003-2005); noncardiac surgery; and no baseline kidney disease). Provincial administrative databases were used to determine outcomes. EXPOSURE: AKI (KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) definitions). OUTCOMES: post-discharge nephrology, family physician, pediatrician, and non-nephrology specialist visits. Regression was used to evaluate factors associated with the presence of nephrology follow-up (Cox) and the number of nephrology and family physician or pediatrician visits (Poisson), among AKI survivors. RESULTS: Of n = 2041, 355 (17%) had any AKI; 64/355 (18%) had nephrology; 198 (56%) had family physician or pediatrician; and 338 (95%) had family physician, pediatrician, or non-nephrology specialist follow-up by 1 year post discharge. Only 44/142 (31%) stage 2-3 AKI patients had nephrology follow-up by 1 year. Inpatient nephrology consult (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 7.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.89-12.30]), kidney admission diagnosis (aHR 4.26 [2.21-8.18]), and AKI non-recovery by discharge (aHR 2.65 [1.55-4.55]) were associated with 1-year nephrology follow-up among any AKI survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrology follow-up after AKI was uncommon, but nearly all AKI survivors had follow-up with non-nephrologist physicians. This suggests that AKI follow-up knowledge translation strategies for non-nephrology providers should be a priority. IMPACT: Pediatric AKI survivors have high long-term rates of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension, justifying regular kidney health surveillance after AKI. However, there is limited pediatric data on follow-up after AKI, including the factors associated with nephrology referral and extent of non-nephrology follow-up. We found that only one-fifth of all AKI survivors and one-third of severe AKI (stage 2-3) survivors have nephrology follow-up within 1 year post discharge. However, 95% are seen by a family physician, pediatrician, or non-nephrology specialist within 1 year post discharge. This suggests that knowledge translation strategies for AKI follow-up should be targeted at non-nephrology healthcare providers.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have characterized follow-up after pediatric acute kidney injury (AKI). Our aim was to describe outpatient AKI follow-up after pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission. METHODS: Two-center retrospective cohort study (0-18 years; PICU survivors (2003-2005); noncardiac surgery; and no baseline kidney disease). Provincial administrative databases were used to determine outcomes. EXPOSURE: AKI (KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) definitions). OUTCOMES: post-discharge nephrology, family physician, pediatrician, and non-nephrology specialist visits. Regression was used to evaluate factors associated with the presence of nephrology follow-up (Cox) and the number of nephrology and family physician or pediatrician visits (Poisson), among AKI survivors. RESULTS: Of n = 2041, 355 (17%) had any AKI; 64/355 (18%) had nephrology; 198 (56%) had family physician or pediatrician; and 338 (95%) had family physician, pediatrician, or non-nephrology specialist follow-up by 1 year post discharge. Only 44/142 (31%) stage 2-3 AKI patients had nephrology follow-up by 1 year. Inpatient nephrology consult (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 7.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.89-12.30]), kidney admission diagnosis (aHR 4.26 [2.21-8.18]), and AKI non-recovery by discharge (aHR 2.65 [1.55-4.55]) were associated with 1-year nephrology follow-up among any AKI survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrology follow-up after AKI was uncommon, but nearly all AKI survivors had follow-up with non-nephrologist physicians. This suggests that AKI follow-up knowledge translation strategies for non-nephrology providers should be a priority. IMPACT: Pediatric AKI survivors have high long-term rates of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension, justifying regular kidney health surveillance after AKI. However, there is limited pediatric data on follow-up after AKI, including the factors associated with nephrology referral and extent of non-nephrology follow-up. We found that only one-fifth of all AKI survivors and one-third of severe AKI (stage 2-3) survivors have nephrology follow-up within 1 year post discharge. However, 95% are seen by a family physician, pediatrician, or non-nephrology specialist within 1 year post discharge. This suggests that knowledge translation strategies for AKI follow-up should be targeted at non-nephrology healthcare providers.
Authors: Amrit Kirpalani; Charushree Prasad; Natasha A Jawa; Adelle R Atkinson; Mark Feldman; Justin M Jeffers; Damien G Noone Journal: Paediatr Child Health Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 2.600