Literature DB >> 33731721

Differential gene expression profile between progressive and de novo muscle invasive bladder cancer and its prognostic implication.

Raquel Carrasco1, Laura Izquierdo1, Antoine G van der Heijden2, Juan José Lozano3, Marco Franco1, Mercedes Ingelmo-Torres1, Fiorella L Roldan1, Montserrat Llorens1, María José Ribal1, Lourdes Mengual4,5, Antonio Alcaraz1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to ascertain gene expression profile differences between progressive muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and de novo MIBC, and to identify prognostic biomarkers to improve patients' treatment. Retrospective multicenter study in which 212 MIBC patients who underwent radical cystectomy between 2000 and 2019 were included. Gene expression profiles were determined in 26 samples using Illumina microarrays. The expression levels of 94 genes were studied by quantitative PCR in an independent set of 186 MIBC patients. In a median follow-up of 16 months, 46.7% patients developed tumor progression after cystectomy. In our series, progressive MIBC patients show a worse tumor progression (p = 0.024) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.049) than the de novo group. A total of 480 genes were found to be differently expressed between both groups. Differential expression of 24 out of the 94 selected genes was found in an independent cohort. RBPMC2 and DSC3 were found as independent prognostic biomarkers of tumor progression and CALD1 and LCOR were identified as prognostic biomarkers of CSS between both groups. In conclusion, progressive and de novo MIBC patients show different clinical outcome and gene expression profiles. Gene expression patterns may contribute to predict high-risk of progression to distant metastasis or CSS.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33731721      PMCID: PMC7969618          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85137-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  36 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response.

Authors:  V G Tusher; R Tibshirani; G Chu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Illumina universal bead arrays.

Authors:  Jian-Bing Fan; Kevin L Gunderson; Marina Bibikova; Joanne M Yeakley; Jing Chen; Eliza Wickham Garcia; Lori L Lebruska; Marc Laurent; Richard Shen; David Barker
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  A five-gene expression signature to predict progression in T1G3 bladder cancer.

Authors:  Antoine G van der Heijden; Lourdes Mengual; Juan J Lozano; Mercedes Ingelmo-Torres; Maria J Ribal; Pedro L Fernández; Egbert Oosterwijk; Jack A Schalken; Antonio Alcaraz; J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition in Tumor Metastasis.

Authors:  Vivek Mittal
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 23.472

Review 6.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline.

Authors:  Sam S Chang; Stephen A Boorjian; Roger Chou; Peter E Clark; Siamak Daneshmand; Badrinath R Konety; Raj Pruthi; Diane Z Quale; Chad R Ritch; John D Seigne; Eila Curlee Skinner; Norm D Smith; James M McKiernan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Investigation of RIP140 and LCoR as independent markers for poor prognosis in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Aurelia Vattai; Vincent Cavailles; Sophie Sixou; Susanne Beyer; Christina Kuhn; Mina Peryanova; Helene Heidegger; Kerstin Hermelink; Doris Mayr; Sven Mahner; Christian Dannecker; Udo Jeschke; Bernd Kost
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-31

8.  Association of DSC3 mRNA down-regulation in prostate cancer with promoter hypermethylation and poor prognosis.

Authors:  Jincheng Pan; Yu Chen; Chengqiang Mo; Daohu Wang; Junxing Chen; Xiaopeng Mao; Shengjie Guo; Jintao Zhuang; Shaopeng Qiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Overexpression of PTK6 predicts poor prognosis in bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Xu; Yun-Lin Ye; Zhi-Ming Wu; Qiu-Ming He; Lei Tan; Kang-Hua Xiao; Rui-Yan Wu; Yan Yu; Jia Mai; Zhi-Ling Li; Xiao-Dan Peng; Yun Huang; Xuan Li; Hai-Liang Zhang; Xiao-Feng Zhu; Zi-Ke Qin
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Oncological Outcome of Primary and Secondary Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Ge; Li Wang; Meng Lu; Lijun Mao; Wang Li; Rumin Wen; Jian Lin; Junqi Wang; Jiacun Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Prognostic Significance of Proteasome 26S Subunit, Non-ATPase (PSMD) Genes for Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  AbdulFattah Salah Fararjeh; Ali Al-Khader; Malak Al-Saleem; Rinad Abu Qauod
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-12-22

2.  Identifying a hypoxia related score to predict the prognosis of bladder cancer: a study with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.

Authors:  Zhenan Zhang; Qinhan Li; Aolin Li; Feng Wang; Zhicun Li; Yisen Meng; Qian Zhang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-12

3.  Identification of Key Genes Associated with Progression and Prognosis of Bladder Cancer through Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis.

Authors:  Shiv Verma; Eswar Shankar; Spencer Lin; Vaibhav Singh; E Ricky Chan; Shufen Cao; Pingfu Fu; Gregory T MacLennan; Lee E Ponsky; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.