| Literature DB >> 33731356 |
T Takenaka1, K Ishihara1, M Roppongi1, Y Miao1, Y Mizukami1, T Makita1, J Tsurumi1, S Watanabe1, J Takeya1, M Yamashita2, K Torizuka2,3, Y Uwatoko2, T Sasaki4, X Huang5, W Xu5, D Zhu5, N Su6, J-G Cheng6, T Shibauchi7, K Hashimoto7.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which are self-assemblies of metal ions and organic ligands, provide a tunable platform to search a new state of matter. A two-dimensional (2D) perfect kagome lattice, whose geometrical frustration is a key to realizing quantum spin liquids, has been formed in the π - d conjugated 2D MOF [Cu3(C6S6)] n (Cu-BHT). The recent discovery of its superconductivity with a critical temperature T c of 0.25 kelvin raises fundamental questions about the nature of electron pairing. Here, we show that Cu-BHT is a strongly correlated unconventional superconductor with extremely low superfluid density. A nonexponential temperature dependence of superfluid density is observed, indicating the possible presence of superconducting gap nodes. The magnitude of superfluid density is much smaller than those in conventional superconductors and follows the Uemura's relation of strongly correlated superconductors. These results imply that the unconventional superconductivity in Cu-BHT originates from electron correlations related to spin fluctuations of kagome lattice.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33731356 PMCID: PMC7968839 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf3996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Crystal structure of Cu-BHT and its transport and optical properties.
(A and B) Crystal structure of Cu-BHT viewed along the c direction (A) and viewed from the side (B). The lattice parameters, a = 8.675 Å and c = 3.489 Å, were determined by the powder x-ray diffraction pattern (). The black dotted parallelogram in (A) indicates the in-plane unit cell. The green shaded area indicates the perfect kagome lattice of Cu2+ ions. (C) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy image of Cu-BHT. The top right inset displays the amplified image with higher magnification focused on the square area in the main panel. (D) Temperature dependence of the in-plane resistivity in Cu-BHT. The inset shows the low-temperature data below 0.4 K. A sharp superconducting transition is observed at around 0.25 to 0.3 K. (E) Optical reflectivity spectra (blue circles) in Cu-BHT measured at 4 K. The black solid line is the fit to the Drude-Lorentz (DL) model. The inset shows the optical conductivity spectra (red line) obtained from the optical reflectivity (see the Supplementary Materials). The green line represents the Drude term. The blue circle in the inset shows the value of the dc conductivity obtained from the standard four-probe method at 4 K (σ1(0) = 1/ρ = 2500 ohm−1cm−1), which is consistent with σ1(0) obtained from the optical measurements. The plasma frequency ωp was estimated to be ∼880 cm−1, at which σ1(ω) of the Drude term becomes almost zero.
Fig. 2Anisotropy of the upper critical fields of Cu-BHT.
(A and B) Temperature dependence of the in-plane resistivity in magnetic fields applied perpendicular (A) and parallel (B) to the in-plane direction. (C) Temperature dependence of the upper critical fields for the H∥ configuration (blue circles) and the H⊥ configuration (red circles). Here, we defined μ0Hc2 as a field at which the resistivity becomes 50% of the normal-state value. The dashed lines represent the WHH model (). The anisotropy of Hc2 is estimated to be 1.5, and the in-plane and out-of-plane coherence lengths were estimated to be ξ∥ = 41 nm and ξ⊥ = 27 nm, respectively, through the relations, and Hc2∥(0) = Φ0/(2πξ∥ξ⊥), where Φ0 = 2.07 × 10−15 Wb is the flux quantum.
Fig. 3Magnetic penetration depth and normalized superfluid density of Cu-BHT.
(A) TDO frequency shift normalized by the total shift during the superconducting transition. The inset shows the schematic illustration of the superconducting screening current in an ac magnetic field. (B) Change in the magnetic penetration depth normalized by λ(0) (red circles) plotted against T/Tc. The blue solid line represents the fully gapped behavior expected in the conventional s-wave (BCS) case (Δ0 = 1.76 kBTc). Inset: The same data plotted against (T/Tc)2. (C) Normalized superfluid density plotted against T/Tc. The blue solid line shows the behaviors expected in the s-wave (full gap with Δ0 = 1.76 kBTc) case. The green (scattering parameter Γ = 0.1 kBTc) and black (Γ = 0) lines represent the d-wave (line-node gap with Δ0 = 2.14 kBTc) with and without impurities, respectively ().
Fig. 4Uemura plot.
Tc is plotted against the effective superfluid density (bottom axis) given by n2D/(m*/m0) for 2D systems and for 3D systems, where n2D is the carrier concentration within the superconducting planes for 2D systems, n3D is the carrier concentration for 3D systems, and m0 is the free electron mass. Here n2D = n3D × d, where d is the interlayer spacing of the superconducting planes in 2D systems. Note that TF (top axis) is proportional to the effective carrier density n2D through the relation TF = ℏ2πn2D/(kBm*). For Cu-BHT, the 2D formula was used (for details, see the Supplementary Materials). The error bar of Tc is determined by the sample dependence in the magnetic susceptibility measurements (see fig. S1B). The error bar of comes from the uncertainty of the absolute value of the zero-temperature magnetic penetration depth λ(0). In this study, we evaluated λ(0) from the plasma frequency ωp = 880 ± 80 cm−1 measured at 4 K through the relation λ(0) = c/ωp. Since the previous specific heat studies () point to an increase in the effective mass below 1 K due to possible quantum fluctuations, the possibility that TF decreases owing to the temperature variation of the effective mass below 1 K should be taken into account, which is the main source of the error of TF. Therefore, we evaluated the error bar by considering that the electronic specific heat coefficient γel ∝ m* is enhanced below 1 K from 15 mJ·mol−1K−2 above 1 K to 40 mJ·mol−1 K−2 at 0.2 K. The black dashed line is the Bose-Einstein condensation temperature for the ideal 3D boson gas. The blue solid line represents the line where Tc = TF. Here, BEDT-TTF and TMTSF stand for bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene and tetramethyltetraselenafulvalene, respectively, and LAO and STO represent LaAlO3 and SrTiO3, respectively. TBG and EDLT stand for twisted bilayer graphene and electric double layer transistor, respectively.