Philipp Schwemmer1, Moritz Mercker2, Klaus Heinrich Vanselow3, Pierrick Bocher4, Stefan Garthe3. 1. Research and Technology Centre (FTZ), University of Kiel, Hafentörn 1, 25761, Büsum, Germany. schwemmer@ftz-west.uni-kiel.de. 2. Bionum GmbH - Consultants in Biological Statistics, 21129, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Research and Technology Centre (FTZ), University of Kiel, Hafentörn 1, 25761, Büsum, Germany. 4. Littoral Environnement et Sociétés Laboratory (LIENSs), University of La Rochelle CNRS, 17000, La Rochelle, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Departure decisions in long-distance migratory bird species may depend on favourable weather conditions and beneficial resources at the destination location, overarched by genetic triggers. However, few studies have tried to validate the significance of these three concepts simultaneously, and long-term, high-resolution tagging datasets recording individual movements across consecutive years are scarce. We used such a dataset to explore intraspecific and intra-individual variabilities in departure and arrival decisions from/to wintering grounds in relation to these three different concepts in bird migration. METHODS: We equipped 23 curlews (Numenius arquata) wintering in the Wadden Sea with Global Positioning System data loggers to record their spatio-temporal patterns of departure from and arrival at their wintering site, and the first part of their spring migration. We obtained data for 42 migrations over 6 years, with 12 individuals performing repeat migrations in consecutive years. Day of year of departure and arrival was related to 38 meteorological and bird-related predictors using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to identify drivers of departure and arrival decisions. RESULTS: Curlews migrated almost exclusively to Arctic and sub-Arctic Russia for breeding. They left their wintering site mainly during the evening from mid- to late April and returned between the end of June and mid-July. There was no difference in departure times between the sexes. Weather parameters did not impact departure decisions; if departure days coincided with headwind conditions, the birds accounted for this by flying at higher altitudes of up to several kilometres. Curlews breeding further away in areas with late snowmelt departed later. Departures dates varied by only < 4 days in individual curlews tagged over consecutive years. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the trigger for migration in this long-distance migrant is largely independent of weather conditions but is subject to resource availability in breeding areas. The high intra-individual repeatability of departure days among subsequent years and the lack of relationship to weather parameters suggest the importance of genetic triggers in prompting the start of migration. Further insights into the timing of migration in immatures and closely related birds might help to further unravel the genetic mechanisms triggering migration patterns.
BACKGROUND: Departure decisions in long-distance migratory bird species may depend on favourable weather conditions and beneficial resources at the destination location, overarched by genetic triggers. However, few studies have tried to validate the significance of these three concepts simultaneously, and long-term, high-resolution tagging datasets recording individual movements across consecutive years are scarce. We used such a dataset to explore intraspecific and intra-individual variabilities in departure and arrival decisions from/to wintering grounds in relation to these three different concepts in bird migration. METHODS: We equipped 23 curlews (Numenius arquata) wintering in the Wadden Sea with Global Positioning System data loggers to record their spatio-temporal patterns of departure from and arrival at their wintering site, and the first part of their spring migration. We obtained data for 42 migrations over 6 years, with 12 individuals performing repeat migrations in consecutive years. Day of year of departure and arrival was related to 38 meteorological and bird-related predictors using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to identify drivers of departure and arrival decisions. RESULTS: Curlews migrated almost exclusively to Arctic and sub-Arctic Russia for breeding. They left their wintering site mainly during the evening from mid- to late April and returned between the end of June and mid-July. There was no difference in departure times between the sexes. Weather parameters did not impact departure decisions; if departure days coincided with headwind conditions, the birds accounted for this by flying at higher altitudes of up to several kilometres. Curlews breeding further away in areas with late snowmelt departed later. Departures dates varied by only < 4 days in individual curlews tagged over consecutive years. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the trigger for migration in this long-distance migrant is largely independent of weather conditions but is subject to resource availability in breeding areas. The high intra-individual repeatability of departure days among subsequent years and the lack of relationship to weather parameters suggest the importance of genetic triggers in prompting the start of migration. Further insights into the timing of migration in immatures and closely related birds might help to further unravel the genetic mechanisms triggering migration patterns.
Authors: Sarah T Saalfeld; Daniel C McEwen; Dylan C Kesler; Malcolm G Butler; Jenny A Cunningham; Andrew C Doll; Willow B English; Danielle E Gerik; Kirsten Grond; Patrick Herzog; Brooke L Hill; Benjamin J Lagassé; Richard B Lanctot Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Robert E Gill; T Lee Tibbitts; David C Douglas; Colleen M Handel; Daniel M Mulcahy; Jon C Gottschalck; Nils Warnock; Brian J McCaffery; Philip F Battley; Theunis Piersma Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2009-02-07 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Annette L Fayet; Robin Freeman; Akiko Shoji; Holly L Kirk; Oliver Padget; Chris M Perrins; Tim Guilford Journal: J Anim Ecol Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 5.091
Authors: Françoise Amélineau; Nicolas Delbart; Philipp Schwemmer; Riho Marja; Jérôme Fort; Stefan Garthe; Jaanus Elts; Philippe Delaporte; Pierre Rousseau; Françoise Duraffour; Pierrick Bocher Journal: Biol Lett Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 3.812
Authors: Batbayar Galtbalt; Amanda Lilleyman; Jonathan T Coleman; Chuyu Cheng; Zhijun Ma; Danny I Rogers; Bradley K Woodworth; Richard A Fuller; Stephen T Garnett; Marcel Klaassen Journal: Mov Ecol Date: 2021-06-13 Impact factor: 3.600