Literature DB >> 33731088

Structured work-based learning in undergraduate clinical radiology immersion experience.

Ulf Teichgräber1, Maja Ingwersen2, Florian Bürckenmeyer2, Amer Malouhi2, Clemens Arndt2, Aimée Herzog2, Tobias Franiel2, Hans-Joachim Mentzel2, René Aschenbach2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practical courses in undergraduate medical training often lack a didactic concept. Active participation and learning success largely depend on chance. This study was initiated to evaluate a novel concept of structured work-based learning (WBL) in the course of students' half-day radiology immersion experience (IE).
METHODS: This prospective, single-centre cohort study included 228 third-year students of the 2019 summer semester who underwent the obligatory radiology IE at a university hospital. The course was based on a novel structured WBL concept that applied established didactic concepts including blended learning, the FAIR principles of feedback, activity, individualization, and relevance, and Peyton's four-step approach. Outcomes of equal weight were student and supervisor satisfaction with the clinical radiology IE assessed by paper-based- and online survey, respectively. Secondary outcome was achievement of intended learning outcomes assessed by means of mini clinical evaluation exercises and personal interviews.
RESULTS: Satisfaction with structured WBL was high in 99.0% of students. Students' expectations were exceeded, and they felt taken seriously at the professional level. Dissatisfaction was reasoned with quality of learning videos (0.6%), little support by supervisors (0.5%), or inadequate feedback (0.6%). Supervising resident physicians rated achievement of intended learning outcomes regarding cognitive and psychomotor competences as excellent for all students. Personal interviews revealed achievement of affective competence in some students. Twelve of 16 (75.0%) supervising physicians were satisfied with focussing on intended learning outcomes and student preparation for IE. Two of 15 (13.3%) supervisors were unsatisfied with time spent, and 4 of 16 (25%) with the approach of assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that both students and supervisors were satisfied with the novel concept of structured WBL within the scope of clinical radiology IE. Achievement of intended learning outcomes was promising.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distance education and online learning; Immersion learning; Peyton’s four-step approach; Undergraduate medical education; Workplace learning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33731088      PMCID: PMC7972199          DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02592-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Educ        ISSN: 1472-6920            Impact factor:   2.463


  19 in total

1.  Experience-based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning.

Authors:  Tim Dornan; Henny Boshuizen; Nigel King; Albert Scherpbier
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Flipped Classroom Model for Teaching Undergraduate Students in Radiology.

Authors:  Shaista Afzal; Imrana Masroor
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.711

Review 3.  The Flipped Classroom - From Theory to Practice in Health Professional Education.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Jacqueline E McLaughlin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents?

Authors:  G L Noel; J E Herbers; M P Caplow; G S Cooper; L N Pangaro; J Harvey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Experience Based Learning (ExBL): Clinical teaching for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Tim Dornan; Richard Conn; Helen Monaghan; Grainne Kearney; Hannah Gillespie; Deirdre Bennett
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Impact of a Heutagogical, Multimedia-Based Teaching Concept to Promote Self-Determined, Cooperative Student Learning in Clinical Radiology.

Authors:  Ulf Teichgräber; Maja Ingwersen; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Rene Aschenbach; Rotraud Neumann; Tobias Franiel; Aimée Barbara Herzog; Joachim Böttcher; Alexander Pfeil; Birger Mensel; Christian Kühnel; Martin Freesmeyer; Martin R Fischer; Jan Zottmann
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2020-12-16

7.  Variability and dimensionality of students' and supervisors' mini-CEX scores in undergraduate medical clerkships - a multilevel factor analysis.

Authors:  Christoph Berendonk; Anja Rogausch; Armin Gemperli; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results.

Authors:  Thomas Brockfeld; Bringfried Müller; Jan de Laffolie
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2018-12

Review 9.  Effectiveness of Digital Education on Communication Skills Among Medical Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.

Authors:  Bhone Myint Kyaw; Pawel Posadzki; Sophie Paddock; Josip Car; James Campbell; Lorainne Tudor Car
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Teaching heuristics and mnemonics to improve generation of differential diagnoses.

Authors:  F Stuart Leeds; Kareem M Atwa; Alexander M Cook; Katharine A Conway; Timothy N Crawford
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2020-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Integration of ultrasonography training into undergraduate medical education: catch up with professional needs.

Authors:  Ulf Teichgräber; Maja Ingwersen; Claudia Ehlers; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Christoph Redies; Andreas Stallmach; Wilhelm Behringer; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-09-24

2.  Virtual inverted classroom to replace in-person radiology lectures at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic - a prospective evaluation and historic comparison.

Authors:  Ulf Teichgräber; Birger Mensel; Tobias Franiel; Aimée Herzog; Chie-Hee Cho-Nöth; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Maja Ingwersen; René Aschenbach
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.