David M Hallman1, Leticia Bergamin Januario2, Svend Erik Mathiassen2, Marina Heiden2, Sven Svensson2, Gunnar Bergström2,3. 1. Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden. david.hallman@hig.se. 2. Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden. 3. Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered national recommendations encouraging people to work from home (WFH), but the possible impact of WFH on physical behaviors is unknown. This study aimed to determine the extent to which the 24-h allocation of time to different physical behaviors changes between days working at the office (WAO) and days WFH in office workers during the pandemic. METHODS: Data were collected on 27 office workers with full-time employment at a Swedish municipal division during the COVID-19 outbreak in May-July 2020. A thigh-worn accelerometer (Axivity) was used to assess physical behavior (sedentary, stand, move) during seven consecutive days. A diary was used to identify periods of work, leisure and sleep. 24-h compositions of sedentary, standing and moving behaviors during work and non-work time were examined using Compositional data analysis (CoDA), and differences between days WAO and days WFH were determined using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Days WFH were associated with more time spent sleeping relative to awake, and the effect size was large (F = 7.4; p = 0.01; ηp2 = 0.22). The increase (34 min) in sleep time during WFH occurred at the expense of a reduction in work and leisure time by 26 min and 7 min, respectively. Sedentary, standing and moving behaviors did not change markedly during days WFH compared to days WAO. CONCLUSION: Days working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden were associated with longer duration of sleep than days working at the office. This behavioral change may be beneficial to health.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered national recommendations encouraging people to work from home (WFH), but the possible impact of WFH on physical behaviors is unknown. This study aimed to determine the extent to which the 24-h allocation of time to different physical behaviors changes between days working at the office (WAO) and days WFH in office workers during the pandemic. METHODS: Data were collected on 27 office workers with full-time employment at a Swedish municipal division during the COVID-19 outbreak in May-July 2020. A thigh-worn accelerometer (Axivity) was used to assess physical behavior (sedentary, stand, move) during seven consecutive days. A diary was used to identify periods of work, leisure and sleep. 24-h compositions of sedentary, standing and moving behaviors during work and non-work time were examined using Compositional data analysis (CoDA), and differences between days WAO and days WFH were determined using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Days WFH were associated with more time spent sleeping relative to awake, and the effect size was large (F = 7.4; p = 0.01; ηp2 = 0.22). The increase (34 min) in sleep time during WFH occurred at the expense of a reduction in work and leisure time by 26 min and 7 min, respectively. Sedentary, standing and moving behaviors did not change markedly during days WFH compared to days WAO. CONCLUSION: Days working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden were associated with longer duration of sleep than days working at the office. This behavioral change may be beneficial to health.
Authors: Robert Ross; Jean-Philippe Chaput; Lora M Giangregorio; Ian Janssen; Travis J Saunders; Michelle E Kho; Veronica J Poitras; Jennifer R Tomasone; Rasha El-Kotob; Emily C McLaughlin; Mary Duggan; Julie Carrier; Valerie Carson; Sebastien F Chastin; Amy E Latimer-Cheung; Tala Chulak-Bozzer; Guy Faulkner; Stephanie M Flood; Mary Kate Gazendam; Genevieve N Healy; Peter T Katzmarzyk; William Kennedy; Kirstin N Lane; Amanda Lorbergs; Kaleigh Maclaren; Sharon Marr; Kenneth E Powell; Ryan E Rhodes; Amanda Ross-White; Frank Welsh; Juana Willumsen; Mark S Tremblay Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Geoffrey H Tison; Robert Avram; Peter Kuhar; Sean Abreau; Greg M Marcus; Mark J Pletcher; Jeffrey E Olgin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Nidhi Gupta; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Andreas Holtermann; Svend Erik Mathiassen Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Stefania Angela Di Fusco; Antonella Spinelli; Lorenzo Castello; Edoardo Mocini; Michele Massimo Gulizia; Fabrizio Oliva; Domenico Gabrielli; Giuseppe Imperoli; Furio Colivicchi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Pooriput Waongenngarm; Allard J van der Beek; Nipaporn Akkarakittichoke; Prawit Janwantanakul Journal: Asia Pac J Public Health Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 2.270
Authors: Luiz Augusto Brusaca; Dechristian França Barbieri; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Andreas Holtermann; Ana Beatriz Oliveira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Venerando Rapisarda; Carla Loreto; Laura De Angelis; Giuditta Simoncelli; Claudia Lombardo; Riccardo Resina; Nicola Mucci; Agata Matarazzo; Luigi Vimercati; Caterina Ledda Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 3.390