Literature DB >> 33731044

Marginal cord insertion among singleton births at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Hailu Aragie1, Mohammed Oumer2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord may insert abnormally i.e. marginal insertion to a placenta which can cause different birth and perinatal complications. Despite the increased effort taken by different responsible bodies, the prevalence of birth and perinatal complications are still high, possibly due to anomalous cord insertion. So far, anomalous cord insertion lacks proper attention in different medical settings. Hence, the present study aims to assess the magnitude, risk factors, and adverse birth outcomes of marginal cord insertion among singleton births.
METHODS: An institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. Data were collected by using a structured questionnaire and it was entered into epi-data version 3.1 then exported to SPSS version 20 for data cleansing and analysis. Bi-variable and multivariable logistic regressions were employed to identify risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with marginal cord insertions. Crude and adjusted odds ratio (P-value < 0.05) with a 95% confidence interval were calculated. RESULT: The magnitude of marginal cord insertion was 6.4% (95% CI = 4.4-8.8%) in singleton pregnancies. Independent risk factors for marginal cord insertion were advanced maternal age (AOR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.35-11.08), primiparity (AOR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.37-8.69), maternal chronic hypertension (AOR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.66-9.76), previous cesarean delivery (AOR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.43-10.21), and use of intrauterine contraceptive device before pregnancy (AOR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.36-12.30). Pregnancies complicated by marginal cord insertion are at higher risk to develop low birth weight (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.23-6.80), preterm birth (AOR = 4.00, 95% CI: 1.44-11.14), and emergency cesarean delivery (AOR = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.03-13.81). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Marginal cord insertion is a mistreated potential risk for low birth weight, preterm birth, and emergency cesarean delivery. Routine screening of marginal cord insertion should be considered in pregnancies with advanced age, nulliparity, hypertensive disorder, history of cesarean section, and intrauterine contraceptive device usage before pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse birth outcomes; Ethiopia; Gondar; Marginal cord insertion; Singleton births

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33731044      PMCID: PMC7967970          DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03703-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  18 in total

1.  Third stage of labor risks in velamentous and marginal cord insertion: a population-based study.

Authors:  Cathrine Ebbing; Torvid Kiserud; Synnøve L Johnsen; Susanne Albrechtsen; Svein Rasmussen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Abnormal Placental Cord Insertion and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Khadijah I Ismail; Ailish Hannigan; Peter Kelehan; Keelin O'Donoghue; Amanda Cotter
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  [RISK FACTORS, COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES OF PREGNANCIES WITH VELAMENTOUS CORD INSERTION].

Authors:  Gil Gutvirtz; Yael Baumfeld; Iris Shoham; Eyal Sheiner
Journal:  Harefuah       Date:  2016-02

4.  Placentas From Women of Advanced Maternal Age: An Independent Indication for Pathologic Examination?

Authors:  Vanda F Torous; Drucilla J Roberts
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Modeling the variability of shapes of a human placenta.

Authors:  M Yampolsky; C M Salafia; O Shlakhter; D Haas; B Eucker; J Thorp
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Centrality of the umbilical cord insertion in a human placenta influences the placental efficiency.

Authors:  M Yampolsky; Carolyn M Salafia; O Shlakhter; D Haas; B Eucker; J Thorp
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  The development, structure and blood flow within the umbilical cord with particular reference to the venous system.

Authors:  Jacqueline Spurway; Patricia Logan; Sokcheon Pak
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

8.  Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of velamentous and marginal cord insertions: a population-based study of 634,741 pregnancies.

Authors:  Cathrine Ebbing; Torvid Kiserud; Synnøve Lian Johnsen; Susanne Albrechtsen; Svein Rasmussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Influence of the umbilical cord insertion site on the optimal individual birth weight achievement.

Authors:  Sophie Brouillet; Anaïs Dufour; Fabien Prot; Jean-Jacques Feige; Véronique Equy; Nadia Alfaidy; Pierre Gillois; Pascale Hoffmann
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Indications and determinants of caesarean section delivery: Evidence from a population-based study in Matlab, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Tahmina Begum; Aminur Rahman; Herfina Nababan; Dewan Md Emdadul Hoque; Al Fazal Khan; Taslim Ali; Iqbal Anwar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.