Mabel Berrueta1, Agustin Ciapponi2, Ariel Bardach2, Federico Rodriguez Cairoli2, Fabricio J Castellano2, Xu Xiong3, Andy Stergachis4, Sabra Zaraa4, Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter Meulen5, Pierre Buekens3. 1. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina. mberrueta@iecs.org.ar. 2. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. 4. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-7631, USA. 5. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most post-licensure vaccine pharmacovigilance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are passive reporting systems. These have limited utility for maternal immunization pharmacovigilance in LMIC settings and need to be supplemented with active surveillance. Our study's main objective was to identify existing perinatal data collection systems in LMICs that collect individual information on maternal and neonatal health outcomes and could be developed to inform active safety surveillance of novel vaccines for use during pregnancy. METHODS: A scoping review was performed following the Arksey and O'Malley six-stage approach. We included studies describing electronic or mixed paper-electronic data collection systems in LMICs, including research networks, electronic medical records, and custom software platforms for health information systems. Medline PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Bibliography of Asian Studies (BAS), and CINAHL were searched through August 2019. We also searched grey literature including through Google and websites of existing relevant perinatal data collection systems, as well as contacted authors of key studies and experts in the field to validate the information and identify additional sources of relevant unpublished information. RESULTS: A total of 11,817 records were identified. The full texts of 264 records describing 96 data collection systems were assessed for eligibility. Eight perinatal data collection systems met our inclusion criteria: Global Network's Maternal Newborn Health Registry, International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and their Health; Perinatal Informatic System; Pregnancy Exposure Registry & Birth Defects Surveillance; SmartCare; Open Medical Record System; Open Smart Register Platform and District Health Information Software 2. These selected systems were qualitatively characterized according to seven different domains: governance; system design; system management; data management; data sources, outcomes and data quality. CONCLUSION: This review provides a list of active maternal and neonatal data collection systems in LMICs and their characteristics as well as their outreach, strengths, and limitations. Findings could potentially help further understand where to obtain population-based high-quality information on outcomes to inform the conduct of maternal immunization active vaccine safety surveillance activities and research in LMICs.
BACKGROUND: Most post-licensure vaccine pharmacovigilance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are passive reporting systems. These have limited utility for maternal immunization pharmacovigilance in LMIC settings and need to be supplemented with active surveillance. Our study's main objective was to identify existing perinatal data collection systems in LMICs that collect individual information on maternal and neonatal health outcomes and could be developed to inform active safety surveillance of novel vaccines for use during pregnancy. METHODS: A scoping review was performed following the Arksey and O'Malley six-stage approach. We included studies describing electronic or mixed paper-electronic data collection systems in LMICs, including research networks, electronic medical records, and custom software platforms for health information systems. Medline PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Bibliography of Asian Studies (BAS), and CINAHL were searched through August 2019. We also searched grey literature including through Google and websites of existing relevant perinatal data collection systems, as well as contacted authors of key studies and experts in the field to validate the information and identify additional sources of relevant unpublished information. RESULTS: A total of 11,817 records were identified. The full texts of 264 records describing 96 data collection systems were assessed for eligibility. Eight perinatal data collection systems met our inclusion criteria: Global Network's Maternal Newborn Health Registry, International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and their Health; Perinatal Informatic System; Pregnancy Exposure Registry & Birth Defects Surveillance; SmartCare; Open Medical Record System; Open Smart Register Platform and District Health Information Software 2. These selected systems were qualitatively characterized according to seven different domains: governance; system design; system management; data management; data sources, outcomes and data quality. CONCLUSION: This review provides a list of active maternal and neonatal data collection systems in LMICs and their characteristics as well as their outreach, strengths, and limitations. Findings could potentially help further understand where to obtain population-based high-quality information on outcomes to inform the conduct of maternal immunization active vaccine safety surveillance activities and research in LMICs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Active surveillance; Electronic Registries; Global Health; Health Information Systems; Pharmacovigilance; Pregnancy; Vaccination
Authors: Burke W Mamlin; Paul G Biondich; Ben A Wolfe; Hamish Fraser; Darius Jazayeri; Christian Allen; Justin Miranda; William M Tierney Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2006
Authors: José M Belizán; Elizabeth M McClure; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Omrana Pasha; Fabian Esamai; Archana Patel; Elwyn Chomba; Ana Garces; Linda L Wright; Marion Koso-Thomas; Janet Moore; Fernando Althabe; Bhala S Kodkany; Neelofar Sami; Albert Manasyan; Richard J Derman; Edward A Liechty; Patricia Hibberd; Waldemar A Carlo; K Michael Hambidge; Pierre Buekens; Alan H Jobe; Robert L Goldenberg Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Margo S Harrison; Sumera Ali; Omrana Pasha; Sarah Saleem; Fernando Althabe; Mabel Berrueta; Agustina Mazzoni; Elwyn Chomba; Waldemar A Carlo; Ana Garces; Nancy F Krebs; K Hambidge; Shivaprasad S Goudar; S M Dhaded; Bhala Kodkany; Richard J Derman; Archana Patel; Patricia L Hibberd; Fabian Esamai; Edward A Liechty; Janet L Moore; Marion Koso-Thomas; Elizabeth M McClure; Robert L Goldenberg Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Sarah Saleem; Shiyam Sunder Tikmani; Elizabeth M McClure; Janet L Moore; Syed Iqbal Azam; Sangappa M Dhaded; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Ana Garces; Lester Figueroa; Irene Marete; Constance Tenge; Fabian Esamai; Archana B Patel; Sumera Aziz Ali; Farnaz Naqvi; Musaku Mwenchanya; Elwyn Chomba; Waldemar A Carlo; Richard J Derman; Patricia L Hibberd; Sherri Bucher; Edward A Liechty; Nancy Krebs; K Michael Hambidge; Dennis D Wallace; Marion Koso-Thomas; Menachem Miodovnik; Robert L Goldenberg Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Alfred Kwesi Manyeh; Alberta Amu; David Etsey Akpakli; John Williams; Margaret Gyapong Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 3.007