Literature DB >> 337305

Sensory transduction in Escherichia coli: role of a protein methylation reaction in sensory adaptation.

M F Goy, M S Springer, J Adler.   

Abstract

The behavioral response of Escherichia coli to the addition of a stimulatory compound is transient; thus the organism undergoes sensory adaptation. When the compound is removed, E. coli undergoes the inverse process, called deadaptation, and very rapidly regains its sensitivity to the stimulus. In this communication we demonstrate that the previously reported methylation of several cytoplasmic membrane proteins is correlated with, and very likely controls, the state of adaptation of the cell. In the absence of an added stimulus these proteins are methylated to a basal level. When the bacteria are stimulated by the addition of an attractant, the extent of methylation increases over a period of several minutes to a new level, which is maintained as long as the attractant is present. The magnitude of the increase in methylation is a function of the size of the stimulus and is directly proportional to the duration of the behavioral response. Upon removal of the attractant the level of methylation very rapidly falls to the basal value. Previously we have shown that adaptation requires methionine, but maintenance of the adapted state and de-adaptation do not [Springer, M. S., Goy, M. F. & Adler, J. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 183-187]; here we demonstrate that methylation requires methionine but maintenance of an attractant-induced level of methylation and the demethylation that occurs following removal of the attractant do not. These results strongly indicate a role for protein methylation in sensory adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 337305      PMCID: PMC432078          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.4964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: methylation of che gene products.

Authors:  M Silverman; M Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sensory transduction in Escherichia coli: two complementary pathways of information processing that involve methylated proteins.

Authors:  M S Springer; M F Goy; J Adler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Flagellar rotation and the mechanism of bacterial motility.

Authors:  M Silverman; M Simon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  "Decision"-making in bacteria: chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to conflicting stimuli.

Authors:  J Adler; W W Tso
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Change in direction of flagellar rotation is the basis of the chemotactic response in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S H Larsen; R W Reader; E N Kort; W W Tso; J Adler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Bacteria swim by rotating their flagellar filaments.

Authors:  H C Berg; R A Anderson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Common mechanism for repellents and attractants in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  N Tsang; R Macnab; D E Koshland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sensory transduction in Escherichia coli: a requirement for methionine in sensory adaptation.

Authors:  M S Springer; M F Goy; J Adler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D A Brown; H C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  83 in total

1.  Nutrient-dependent methylation of a membrane-associated protein of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C C Young; J D Alvarez; R W Bernlohr
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Spatial organization in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Mutational analysis of the transmembrane helix 2-HAMP domain connection in the Escherichia coli aspartate chemoreceptor tar.

Authors:  Gus A Wright; Rachel L Crowder; Roger R Draheim; Michael D Manson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Role of the CheW protein in bacterial chemotaxis: overexpression is equivalent to absence.

Authors:  D A Sanders; B Mendez; D E Koshland
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Salt taxis in Escherichia coli bacteria and its lack in mutants.

Authors:  Y L Qi; J Adler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Influence of attractants and repellents on methyl group turnover on methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of Bacillus subtilis and role of CheW.

Authors:  D W Hanlon; P B Carpenter; G W Ordal
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Behavioral responses to chemical cues by bacteria.

Authors:  D H Bartlett; P Matsumura
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  A minimal model for metabolism-dependent chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides (†).

Authors:  Sisi Fan; Robert G Endres
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Bacillus cereus electron transport and proton motive force during aerotaxis.

Authors:  D J Laszlo; M Niwano; W W Goral; B L Taylor
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Chemosensory responses of Halobacterium halobium.

Authors:  A Schimz; E Hildebrand
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.