Literature DB >> 33730169

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications' Association with Sugammadex versus Neostigmine: A Retrospective Registry Analysis.

Gen Li, Robert E Freundlich, Rajnish K Gupta, Christina J Hayhurst, Chi H Le, Barbara J Martin, Matthew S Shotwell, Jonathan P Wanderer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade related to nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents may be associated with pulmonary complications. In this study, the authors sought to determine whether sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of postoperative pulmonary complications in comparison with neostigmine.
METHODS: Adult patients from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent general anesthesia procedures between January 2010 and July 2019 were included in an observational cohort study. In early 2017, a wholesale switch from neostigmine to sugammadex occurred at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The authors therefore identified all patients receiving nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockades and reversal with neostigmine or sugammadex. An inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score analysis approach was applied to control for measured confounding. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, determined by retrospective chart review and defined as the composite of the three postoperative respiratory occurrences: pneumonia, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and unplanned intubation.
RESULTS: Of 10,491 eligible cases, 7,800 patients received neostigmine, and 2,691 received sugammadex. A total of 575 (5.5%) patients experienced postoperative pulmonary complications (5.9% neostigmine vs. 4.2% sugammadex). Specifically, 306 (2.9%) patients had pneumonia (3.2% vs. 2.1%), 113 (1.1%) prolonged mechanical ventilation (1.1% vs. 1.1%), and 156 (1.5%) unplanned intubation (1.6% vs. 1.0%). After propensity score adjustment, the authors found a lower absolute incidence rate of postoperative pulmonary complications over time (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [per year]; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.96; P < .001). No difference was observed on the odds of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients receiving sugammadex in comparison with neostigmine (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.22; P = 0.468).
CONCLUSIONS: Among 10,491 patients at a single academic tertiary care center, the authors found that switching neuromuscular blockade reversal agents was not associated with the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Copyright © 2021, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33730169      PMCID: PMC8114582          DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   8.986


  45 in total

1.  Effects of neuromuscular block reversal with sugammadex versus neostigmine on postoperative respiratory outcomes after major abdominal surgery: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Enrique Alday; Manolo Muñoz; Antonio Planas; Esperanza Mata; Carlos Alvarez
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Randomised controlled trial of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on the incidence of pulmonary complications in older adults undergoing prolonged surgery.

Authors:  Brandon M Togioka; David Yanez; Michael F Aziz; Janna R Higgins; Praveen Tekkali; Miriam M Treggiari
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block.

Authors:  Glenn S Murphy; Sorin J Brull
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults.

Authors:  Ana-Marija Hristovska; Patricia Duch; Mikkel Allingstrup; Arash Afshari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-14

Review 5.  Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Naguib; A F Kopman; J E Ensor
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Sugammadex versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (STRONGER): A Multicenter Matched Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Kheterpal; Michelle T Vaughn; Timur Z Dubovoy; Nirav J Shah; Lori D Bash; Douglas A Colquhoun; Amy M Shanks; Michael R Mathis; Roy G Soto; Amit Bardia; Karsten Bartels; Patrick J McCormick; Robert B Schonberger; Leif Saager
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine.

Authors:  R Kevin Jones; James E Caldwell; Sorin J Brull; Roy G Soto
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  An enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery is associated with decreased organ level rates of complications: a difference-in-differences analysis.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; Timothy M Geiger; Adam B King; Jonathan P Wanderer; Vikram Tiwari; Roberta L Muldoon; Molly M Ford; Roger R Dmochowski; Warren S Sandberg; Barbara Martin; M Benjamin Hopkins; Matthew D McEvoy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  A systematic review of sugammadex vs neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  A Abad-Gurumeta; J Ripollés-Melchor; R Casans-Francés; A Espinosa; E Martínez-Hurtado; C Fernández-Pérez; J M Ramírez; F López-Timoneda; J M Calvo-Vecino
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Thirty-Day Postoperative Outcomes Following Sugammadex Use in Colorectal Surgery Patients; Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yun Jeong Chae; Han Bum Joe; Juyeon Oh; Eunyoung Lee; In Kyong Yi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  7 in total

1.  Optimizing Reversal of Neuromuscular Block in Older Adults: Sugammadex or Neostigmine.

Authors:  Brandon M Togioka; Katie J Schenning
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.271

2.  Sugammadex versus neostigmine for routine reversal of neuromuscular blockade and the effect on perioperative efficiency.

Authors:  Andrew P Moss; Mark F Powell; Charity J Morgan; Michelle D Tubinis
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Prevention of Postoperative Events following Reversal with Sugammadex or Neostigmine (the P-PERSoN Trial): Pilot Data Following Early Termination of a Prospective, Blinded, Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Benjamin Olesnicky; Matthew Doane; Clare Farrell; Greg Knoblanche; Anthony Delaney
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2022-07-08

Review 4.  Choice of neuromuscular block reversal agent to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications.

Authors:  Sung-Ae Cho; Tae-Yun Sung
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2022-04-22

5.  The Use of Muscle Relaxants and Reversal Agents in a Setting Without Cost Restrictions: Experience from a Tertiary Academic Hospital in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Chris H Martini; G H Maarten Honing; Lori D Bash; Erik Olofsen; Marieke Niesters; Monique van Velzen; Albert Dahan; Martijn Boon
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Predictive study of pharmacological reversal for residual neuromuscular blockade and postoperative pulmonary complications: a prospective, observational, cohort study.

Authors:  Cristian Aragón-Benedí; Ana Pascual-Bellosta; Sonia Ortega-Lucea; Sara Visiedo-Sánchez; Javier Martínez-Ubieto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Sugammadex for reversing neuromuscular blockages after lung surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Li Yang; Kuen-Bao Chen; Mei-Ling Shen; Wei-Ti Hsu; Yu-Wen Lai; Chieh-Min Hsu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.