Literature DB >> 33730106

Development, manufacturing, and preliminary validation of a reusable half-face respirator during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vahid Anwari1,2, William C K Ng3,4,5, Arnaud Romeo Mbadjeu Hondjeu4, Zixuan Xiao6, Edem Afenu7,8, Jessica Trac8, Kate Kazlovich2,9, Joshua Hiansen2, Azad Mashari2,3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to widespread shortages of N95 respirators and other personal protective equipment (PPE). An effective, reusable, locally-manufactured respirator can mitigate this problem. We describe the development, manufacture, and preliminary testing of an open-hardware-licensed device, the "simple silicone mask" (SSM).
METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed a reusable silicone half facepiece respirator over 9 prototype iterations. The manufacturing process consisted of 3D printing and silicone casting. Prototypes were assessed for comfort and breathability. Filtration was assessed by user seal checks and quantitative fit-testing according to CSA Z94.4-18.
RESULTS: The respirator originally included a cartridge for holding filter material; this was modified to connect to standard heat-moisture exchange (HME) filters (N95 or greater) after the cartridge showed poor filtration performance due to flow acceleration around the filter edges, which was exacerbated by high filter resistance. All 8 HME-based iterations provided an adequate seal by user seal checks and achieved a pass rate of 87.5% (N = 8) on quantitative testing, with all failures occurring in the first iteration. The overall median fit-factor was 1662 (100 = pass). Estimated unit cost for a production run of 1000 using distributed manufacturing techniques is CAD $15 in materials and 20 minutes of labor.
CONCLUSION: Small-scale manufacturing of an effective, reusable N95 respirator during a pandemic is feasible and cost-effective. Required quantities of reusables are more predictable and less vulnerable to supply chain disruption than disposables. With further evaluation, such devices may be an alternative to disposable respirators during public health emergencies. The respirator described above is an investigational device and requires further evaluation and regulatory requirements before clinical deployment. The authors and affiliates do not endorse the use of this device at present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33730106      PMCID: PMC7968700          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  11 in total

1.  2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Jane D Siegel; Emily Rhinehart; Marguerite Jackson; Linda Chiarello
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Personal Protective Equipment Supply Chain: Lessons Learned from Recent Public Health Emergency Responses.

Authors:  Anita Patel; Maryann M D'Alessandro; Karen J Ireland; W Greg Burel; Elaine B Wencil; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2017 May/Jun

3.  Ebola 2014--new challenges, new global response and responsibility.

Authors:  Thomas R Frieden; Inger Damon; Beth P Bell; Thomas Kenyon; Stuart Nichol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Reuse of disposable medical devices: historical and current aspects.

Authors:  V W Greene
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1986-10

5.  Potential demand for respirators and surgical masks during a hypothetical influenza pandemic in the United States.

Authors:  Cristina Carias; Gabriel Rainisch; Manjunath Shankar; Bishwa B Adhikari; David L Swerdlow; William A Bower; Satish K Pillai; Martin I Meltzer; Lisa M Koonin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  User acceptance of reusable respirators in health care.

Authors:  Stella E Hines; Clayton Brown; Marc Oliver; Patricia Gucer; Melissa Frisch; Regina Hogan; Tracy Roth; James Chang; Melissa McDiarmid
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  Subject validation of reusable N95 stop-gap filtering facepiece respirators in COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  William C K Ng; Arnaud Romeo Mbadjeu Hondjeu; Andrew Syrett; Rebecca Caragata; Dmitry Rozenberg; Zixuan Xiao; Vahid Anwari; Jessica Trac; Azad Mashari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A novel reusable anti-COVID-19 transparent face respirator with optimized airflow.

Authors:  Hussain Alenezi; Muhammet Emin Cam; Mohan Edirisinghe
Journal:  Biodes Manuf       Date:  2020-09-27

9.  Three-dimensional Printing in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Rod R Jose; Amr N Rabie; Theodore L Gerstle; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10

Review 10.  An overview of filtration efficiency through the masks: Mechanisms of the aerosols penetration.

Authors:  A Tcharkhtchi; N Abbasnezhad; M Zarbini Seydani; N Zirak; S Farzaneh; M Shirinbayan
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-08-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantitative Fit Test of a 3D Printed Frame Fitted Over a Surgical Mask: An Alternative Option to N95 Respirator.

Authors:  Suchada Kongkiatkamon; Norachai Wongkornchaowalit; Valailuck Kiatthanakorn; Somkiat Tonphu; Chaiyos Kunanusont
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-03-16

2.  Quality versus emergency: How good were ventilation fittings produced by additive manufacturing to address shortages during the COVID19 pandemic?

Authors:  Roman Hossein Khonsari; Mathilde Oranger; Pierre-Marc François; Alexis Mendoza-Ruiz; Karl Leroux; Ghilas Boussaid; Delphine Prieur; Jean-Pierre Hodge; Antoine Belle; Vincent Midler; Capucine Morelot-Panzini; Maxime Patout; Jésus Gonzalez-Bermejo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.