Literature DB >> 33728724

Prognostic role of the Donor Risk Index, the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index, and the Balance of Risk score on graft loss after liver transplantation.

Vladimir J Lozanovski1,2, Pascal Probst1,3, Alireza Arefidoust1, Ali Ramouz1, Ehsan Aminizadeh1, Mohammadsadegh Nikdad1, Elias Khajeh1, Omid Ghamarnejad1, Saeed Shafiei1, Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh1, Svenja E Seide4, Eva Kalkum3, Arash Nickkholgh1, Zoltan Czigany5, Georg Lurje6, Markus Mieth1, Arianeb Mehrabi1,2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to identify cutoff values for donor risk index (DRI), Eurotransplant (ET)-DRI, and balance of risk (BAR) scores that predict the risk of liver graft loss. MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically and unrestrictedly. Graft loss odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed by meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel tests with a random-effects model. Cutoff values for predicting graft loss at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years were analyzed for each of the scores. Measures of calibration and discrimination used in studies validating the DRI and the ET-DRI were summarized. DRI ≥ 1.4 (six studies, n = 35 580 patients) and ET-DRI ≥ 1.4 (four studies, n = 11 666 patients) were associated with the highest risk of graft loss at all time points. BAR > 18 was associated with the highest risk of 3-month and 1-year graft loss (n = 6499 patients). A DRI cutoff of 1.8 and an ET-DRI cutoff of 1.7 were estimated using a summary receiver operator characteristic curve, but the sensitivity and specificity of these cutoff values were low. A DRI and ET-DRI score ≥ 1.4 and a BAR score > 18 have a negative influence on graft survival, but these cutoff values are not well suited for predicting graft loss.
© 2021 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eurotransplant; balance of risk score; donor risk index; graft loss; liver transplantation; major extended donor criteria

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728724     DOI: 10.1111/tri.13861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  3 in total

Review 1.  Normothermic Machine Perfusion-Improving the Supply of Transplantable Livers for High-Risk Recipients.

Authors:  Angus Hann; Anisa Nutu; George Clarke; Ishaan Patel; Dimitri Sneiders; Ye H Oo; Hermien Hartog; M Thamara P R Perera
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.842

2.  Prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vladimir J Lozanovski; Ali Ramouz; Ehsan Aminizadeh; Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh; Elias Khajeh; Heike Probst; Susanne Picardi; Christian Rupp; De-Hua Chang; Pascal Probst; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-01-06

3.  Liver Transplant Recipient Characteristics Associated With Worse Post-Transplant Outcomes in Using Elderly Donors.

Authors:  Shingo Shimada; Tayseer Shamaa; Tommy Ivanics; Toshihiro Kitajima; Kelly Collins; Michael Rizzari; Atsushi Yoshida; Marwan Abouljoud; Dilip Moonka; Mei Lu; Shunji Nagai
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.842

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.