Literature DB >> 33728632

Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

Geoffroy Vanbiervliet1, Marin Strijker2, Marianna Arvanitakis3, Arthur Aelvoet2, Urban Arnelo4, Torsten Beyna5, Olivier Busch2, Pierre H Deprez6, Lumir Kunovsky7,8, Alberto Larghi9, Gianpiero Manes10, Alan Moss11,12, Bertrand Napoleon13, Manu Nayar14, Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles15, Stefan Seewald16, Marc Barthet17, Jeanin E van Hooft18.   

Abstract

1: ESGE recommends against diagnostic/therapeutic papillectomy when adenoma is not proven.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2: ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasound and abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for staging of ampullary tumors.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends endoscopic papillectomy in patients with ampullary adenoma without intraductal extension, because of good results regarding outcome (technical and clinical success, morbidity, and recurrence).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends en bloc resection of ampullary adenomas up to 20-30 mm in diameter to achieve R0 resection, for optimizing the complete resection rate, providing optimal histopathology, and reduction of the recurrence rate after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests considering surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas when endoscopic resection is not feasible for technical reasons (e. g. diverticulum, size > 4 cm), and in the case of intraductal involvement (of > 20 mm). Surveillance thereafter is still mandatory.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends direct snare resection without submucosal injection for endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting to reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends long-term monitoring of patients after endoscopic papillectomy or surgical ampullectomy, based on duodenoscopy with biopsies of the scar and of any abnormal area, within the first 3 months, at 6 and 12 months, and thereafter yearly for at least 5 years.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728632     DOI: 10.1055/a-1397-3198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  9 in total

1.  Endoscopic management of tumors of minor ampulla: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ahamed A Khalyfa; Nayab Ahsan; Mahnoor Inam; Kamran Ayub
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  Role of endoscopy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Andrew D Hopper
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Recent Advances in Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopic Intervention: How to Resolve Unmet Needs in Pancreato-Biliary Diseases Endoscopically.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Isayama; Shigeto Ishii; Ko Tomishima; Toshio Fujisawa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Clinical outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy of ampullary adenoma: A multi-center study.

Authors:  Seong Ji Choi; Hong Sik Lee; Jiyeong Kim; Jung Wan Choe; Jae Min Lee; Jong Jin Hyun; Jai Hoon Yoon; Hyo Jung Kim; Jae Seon Kim; Ho Soon Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 5.374

5.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients.

Authors:  Hannah Gondran; Nicolas Musquer; Enrique Perez-Cuadrado-Robles; Pierre Henri Deprez; François Buisson; Arthur Berger; Elodie Cesbron-Métivier; Timothee Wallenhorst; Nicolas David; Franck Cholet; Bastien Perrot; Lucille Quénéhervé; Emmanuel Coron
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.802

6.  Efficacy and Safety of Exploring Deeper Sections of the Infrapapillary Area of the Duodenum by Using Sedative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Ming-Tse Hsu; Chi-Yi Chen; Kai-Sheng Liao; Wei-Sheng Chung
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 1.919

7.  Risk factors for the occurrence of ampullary tumors: A case-control study.

Authors:  Piera Zaccari; Livia Archibugi; Giulio Belfiori; Enrico Nista; Giuseppe dell'Anna; Stefano Crippa; Tommaso Schepis; Matteo Tacelli; Francesca Aleotti; Maria Chiara Petrone; Alberto Mariani; Guido Costamagna; Antonio Gasbarrini; Alberto Larghi; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Gabriele Capurso
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.866

8.  Advantage of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary tumors as an alternative treatment for pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Shohei Abe; Arata Sakai; Atsuhiro Masuda; Mika Miki; Yoshiyuki Harada; Kae Nagao; Noriko Inomata; Shinya Kohashi; Hisahiro Uemura; Shigeto Masuda; Shigeto Ashina; Masanori Gonda; Kohei Yamakawa; Masahiro Tsujimae; Yasutaka Yamada; Takeshi Tanaka; Takashi Kobayashi; Ryota Nakano; Hideyuki Shiomi; Daisuke Tsugawa; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Tetsuo Ajiki; Maki Kanzawa; Takumi Fukumoto; Tomoo Itoh; Yuzo Kodama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Impact of 5-Year Endoscopic Surveillance Intervals with Biopsy following Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Adenoma.

Authors:  Hoonsub So; Sung Woo Ko; Seung Hwan Shin; Eun Ha Kim; Do Hyun Park
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.