Literature DB >> 33728594

Genome editing reagent delivery in plants.

Rishikesh Ghogare1, Yvonne Ludwig2, Gela Myan Bueno2, Inez H Slamet-Loedin2, Amit Dhingra3.   

Abstract

Genome editing holds the potential for rapid crop improvement to meet the challenge of feeding the planet in a changing climate. The delivery of gene editing reagents into the plant cells has been dominated by plasmid vectors delivered using agrobacterium or particle bombardment. This approach involves the production of genetically engineered plants, which need to undergo regulatory approvals. There are various reagent delivery approaches available that have enabled the delivery of DNA-free editing reagents. They invariably involve the use of ribonucleoproteins (RNPs), especially in the case of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. The explant of choice for most of the non-DNA approaches utilizes protoplasts as the recipient explant. While the editing efficiency is high in protoplasts, the ability to regenerate individual plants from edited protoplasts remains a challenge. There are various innovative delivery approaches being utilized to perform in planta edits that can be incorporated in the germline cells or inherited via seed. With the modification and adoption of various novel approaches currently being used in animal systems, it seems likely that non-transgenic genome editing will become routine in higher plants.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agrobacterium; CRISPR/Cas9; Gene gun; Genome editing; Nanoparticles; Non-transgenic genome editing; Ribonucleoprotein; Viral delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728594     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-021-00239-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  72 in total

1.  Lipoplex size determines lipofection efficiency with or without serum.

Authors:  Mohamad Radwan Almofti; Hideyoshi Harashima; Yasuo Shinohara; Ammar Almofti; Wenhao Li; Hiroshi Kiwada
Journal:  Mol Membr Biol       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.857

2.  Efficient Virus-Mediated Genome Editing in Plants Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System.

Authors:  Zahir Ali; Aala Abul-faraj; Lixin Li; Neha Ghosh; Marek Piatek; Ali Mahjoub; Mustapha Aouida; Agnieszka Piatek; Nicholas J Baltes; Daniel F Voytas; Savithramma Dinesh-Kumar; Magdy M Mahfouz
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 13.164

3.  Endosomal Escape and Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Machinery Enabled by Nanoscale Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework.

Authors:  Shahad K Alsaiari; Sachin Patil; Mram Alyami; Kholod O Alamoudi; Fajr A Aleisa; Jasmeen S Merzaban; Mo Li; Niveen M Khashab
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture.

Authors:  Kunling Chen; Yanpeng Wang; Rui Zhang; Huawei Zhang; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 26.379

5.  Genome editing in potato via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery.

Authors:  Mariette Andersson; Helle Turesson; Niklas Olsson; Ann-Sofie Fält; Pia Ohlsson; Matías N Gonzalez; Mathias Samuelsson; Per Hofvander
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.500

6.  Uptake and translocation of metals and nutrients in tomato grown in soil polluted with metal oxide (CeO₂, Fe₃O₄, SnO₂, TiO₂) or metallic (Ag, Co, Ni) engineered nanoparticles.

Authors:  Livia Vittori Antisari; Serena Carbone; Antonietta Gatti; Gilmo Vianello; Paolo Nannipieri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  A simple plant gene delivery system using mesoporous silica nanoparticles as carriers.

Authors:  Feng-Peng Chang; Lin-Yun Kuang; Chia-An Huang; Wann-Neng Jane; Yann Hung; Yue-Ie C Hsing; Chung-Yuan Mou
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 6.331

8.  DNA-free two-gene knockout in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins.

Authors:  Kwangryul Baek; Duk Hyoung Kim; Jooyeon Jeong; Sang Jun Sim; Anastasios Melis; Jin-Soo Kim; EonSeon Jin; Sangsu Bae
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Targeted mutagenesis in wheat microspores using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Pankaj Bhowmik; Evan Ellison; Brittany Polley; Venkatesh Bollina; Manoj Kulkarni; Kaveh Ghanbarnia; Halim Song; Caixia Gao; Daniel F Voytas; Sateesh Kagale
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  High-frequency random DNA insertions upon co-delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein and selectable marker plasmid in rice.

Authors:  Raviraj Banakar; Alan L Eggenberger; Keunsub Lee; David A Wright; Karthik Murugan; Scott Zarecor; Carolyn J Lawrence-Dill; Dipali G Sashital; Kan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  An update on precision genome editing by homology-directed repair in plants.

Authors:  Jilin Chen; Shaoya Li; Yubing He; Jingying Li; Lanqin Xia
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  General guidelines for CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing in plants.

Authors:  Musa Kavas; Ceyhun Kayihan; Ufuk Demirel; Emre Aksoy; Kubilay Yildirim; Bayram Ali Yerlikaya; Irmak Çalik; İlkay Sevgen
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 3.  Advances in Delivery Mechanisms of CRISPR Gene-Editing Reagents in Plants.

Authors:  Larissa C Laforest; Satya Swathi Nadakuduti
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.