Literature DB >> 33728559

Proteomic profiling of clinical and environmental strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Siew Mun Liew1, Savithiri D Puthucheary2, Ganeswrei Rajasekaram3,4, Hwa Chia Chai1, Kek Heng Chua5.   

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous bacterium, which is able to change its physiological characteristics in response to different habitats. Environmental strains are presumably less pathogenic than clinical strains and whether or not the clinical strains originate from the environment or through inter-host transmission remains poorly understood. To minimize the risk of infection, a better understanding of proteomic profiling of P. aeruginosa is necessary for elucidating the correlation between environmental and clinical strains. Based on antimicrobial susceptibility and patterns of virulence, we selected 12 clinical and environmental strains: (i) environmental, (ii) multidrug resistant (MDR) clinical and (iii) susceptible clinical strains. Whole-cell protein was extracted from each strain and subjected to two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry quadrupole time-of-flight (LC-MS QTOF). All 12 strains were clustered into 3 distinct groups based on their variance in protein expression. A total of 526 matched spots were detected and four differentially expressed protein spots (p < 0.05) were identified and all differential spots were downregulated in MDR strain J3. Upregulation of chitin binding and BON domain proteins was present in the environmental and some MDR strains, whereas the clinical strains exhibited distinct proteomic profiles with increased expression of serine protein kinase and arginine/ornithine transport ATP-binding proteins. Significant difference in expression was observed between susceptible clinical and MDR strains, as well as susceptible clinical and environmental strains. Transition from an environmental saprophyte to a clinical strain could alter its physiological characteristics to further increase its adaptation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical; Environmental; Proteomic profiling; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728559     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-06262-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  37 in total

1.  Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from open ocean and comparison with freshwater, clinical, and animal isolates.

Authors:  Nurul Huda Khan; Yoshikazu Ishii; Noriko Kimata-Kino; Hidetake Esaki; Tomohiko Nishino; Masahiko Nishimura; Kazuhiro Kogure
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Groundwater, soil and compost, as possible sources of virulent and antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Edit Kaszab; Júlia Radó; Balázs Kriszt; Judit Pászti; Virág Lesinszki; Ádám Szabó; Gergő Tóth; Ariane Khaledi; Sándor Szoboszlay
Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Comparison of virulence between clinical and environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.

Authors:  Martha Vives-Flórez; Diana Garnica
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 4.  Association between healthcare water systems and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a rapid systematic review.

Authors:  H P Loveday; J A Wilson; K Kerr; R Pitchers; J T Walker; J Browne
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Comparison of the bacteriological quality of tap water and bottled mineral water.

Authors:  Marie Eliza Zamberlan da Silva; Rosangela Getirana Santana; Marcio Guilhermetti; Ivens Camargo Filho; Eliana Harue Endo; Tânia Ueda-Nakamura; Celso Vataru Nakamura; Benedito Prado Dias Filho
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 6.  Risk assessment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in water.

Authors:  Kristina D Mena; Charles P Gerba
Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 7.563

7.  Potential for plant biocontrol activity of isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus stratosphericus strains against bacterial pathogens acting through both induced plant resistance and direct antagonism.

Authors:  Kaliannan Durairaj; Palanivel Velmurugan; Jung-Hee Park; Woo-Suk Chang; Yool-Jin Park; Palaninaicker Senthilkumar; Kyung-Min Choi; Jeong-Ho Lee; Byung-Taek Oh
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  Prevalence and antimicrobial-resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in swimming pools and hot tubs.

Authors:  Jonathan K Lutz; Jiyoung Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Bacterial communities and potential waterborne pathogens within the typical urban surface waters.

Authors:  Decai Jin; Xiao Kong; Bingjian Cui; Shulan Jin; Yunfeng Xie; Xingrun Wang; Ye Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Bioremediation: Data on Pseudomonas aeruginosa effects on the bioremediation of crude oil polluted soil.

Authors:  Modupe Elizabeth Ojewumi; Joshua Olusegun Okeniyi; Jacob Olumuyiwa Ikotun; Elizabeth Toyin Okeniyi; Valentina Anenih Ejemen; Abimbola Patricia Idowu Popoola
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-05-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Association of multidrug resistance behavior of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa to pigment coloration.

Authors:  Ashish Kothari; Shyam Kishor Kumar; Vanya Singh; Prashant Kumar; Karanvir Kaushal; Atul Pandey; Neeraj Jain; Balram Ji Omar
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.