Literature DB >> 33728509

Spatial location is filtered out of visual working memory representations when task irrelevant, just like other features.

Geoffrey F Woodman1,2.   

Abstract

Contrary to early proposals stating that we always store bound object features in visual working memory, more recent work has suggested that we can inhibit the encoding, or consolidation, of irrelevant features of objects into visual working memory. However, a number of theoretical proposals suggest that spatial location is a special feature of an object that might be obligatorily bound to objects stored in visual working memory. In this study, I used a masking paradigm to measure the efficiency of encoding into visual working memory while subjects were tasked with remembering the location, color, or both of these features of the objects. The measures of consolidation efficiency indicate that spatial location is not encoded into visual working memory unless it is relevant for the task at hand. Thus, the present experiments show that we can control which features of an object are selectively stored in working memory, including spatial location, a feature thought to be immune to such filtering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention: interactions with memory; Spatial localization; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728509     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02263-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Fractionating working memory: consolidation and maintenance are independent processes.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-02

Review 3.  The binding problem.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 4.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs.

Authors:  Joo-seok Hyun; Geoffrey F Woodman; Edward K Vogel; Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Brian Barton; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07

7.  Feature-specific encoding flexibility in visual working memory.

Authors:  Aki Kondo; Jun Saiki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.