Literature DB >> 33728412

Detection of the Progression of Anthesis in Field-Grown Maize Tassels: A Case Study.

Seyed Vahid Mirnezami1, Srikant Srinivasan2,3, Yan Zhou2, Patrick S Schnable2, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian1.   

Abstract

The tassel of the maize plant is responsible for the production and dispersal of pollen for subsequent capture by the silk (stigma) and fertilization of the ovules. Both the amount and timing of pollen shed are physiological traits that impact the production of a hybrid seed. This study describes an automated end-to-end pipeline that combines deep learning and image processing approaches to extract tassel flowering patterns from time-lapse camera images of plants grown under field conditions. Inbred lines from the SAM and NAM diversity panels were grown at the Curtiss farm at Iowa State University, Ames, IA, during the summer of 2016. Using a set of around 500 pole-mounted cameras installed in the field, images of plants were captured every 10 minutes of daylight hours over a three-week period. Extracting data from imaging performed under field conditions is challenging due to variabilities in weather, illumination, and the morphological diversity of tassels. To address these issues, deep learning algorithms were used for tassel detection, classification, and segmentation. Image processing approaches were then used to crop the main spike of the tassel to track reproductive development. The results demonstrated that deep learning with well-labeled data is a powerful tool for detecting, classifying, and segmenting tassels. Our sequential workflow exhibited the following metrics: mAP for tassel detection was 0.91, F1 score obtained for tassel classification was 0.93, and accuracy of semantic segmentation in creating a binary image from the RGB tassel images was 0.95. This workflow was used to determine spatiotemporal variations in the thickness of the main spike-which serves as a proxy for anthesis progression.
Copyright © 2021 Seyed Vahid Mirnezami et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728412      PMCID: PMC7953991          DOI: 10.34133/2021/4238701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Phenomics        ISSN: 2643-6515


  19 in total

1.  Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize.

Authors:  Jianming Yu; James B Holland; Michael D McMullen; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The genetic architecture of maize flowering time.

Authors:  Edward S Buckler; James B Holland; Peter J Bradbury; Charlotte B Acharya; Patrick J Brown; Chris Browne; Elhan Ersoz; Sherry Flint-Garcia; Arturo Garcia; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Major M Goodman; Carlos Harjes; Kate Guill; Dallas E Kroon; Sara Larsson; Nicholas K Lepak; Huihui Li; Sharon E Mitchell; Gael Pressoir; Jason A Peiffer; Marco Oropeza Rosas; Torbert R Rocheford; M Cinta Romay; Susan Romero; Stella Salvo; Hector Sanchez Villeda; H Sofia da Silva; Qi Sun; Feng Tian; Narasimham Upadyayula; Doreen Ware; Heather Yates; Jianming Yu; Zhiwu Zhang; Stephen Kresovich; Michael D McMullen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genetic architecture of flowering time differentiation between locally adapted populations of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Michael A Grillo; Changbao Li; Mark Hammond; Lijuan Wang; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Deep Count: Fruit Counting Based on Deep Simulated Learning.

Authors:  Maryam Rahnemoonfar; Clay Sheppard
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Automated Method to Determine Two Critical Growth Stages of Wheat: Heading and Flowering.

Authors:  Pouria Sadeghi-Tehran; Kasra Sabermanesh; Nicolas Virlet; Malcolm J Hawkesford
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  TIPS: a system for automated image-based phenotyping of maize tassels.

Authors:  Joseph L Gage; Nathan D Miller; Edgar P Spalding; Shawn M Kaeppler; Natalia de Leon
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.993

7.  An explainable deep machine vision framework for plant stress phenotyping.

Authors:  Sambuddha Ghosal; David Blystone; Asheesh K Singh; Baskar Ganapathysubramanian; Arti Singh; Soumik Sarkar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Computer vision and machine learning enabled soybean root phenotyping pipeline.

Authors:  Kevin G Falk; Talukder Z Jubery; Seyed V Mirnezami; Kyle A Parmley; Soumik Sarkar; Arti Singh; Baskar Ganapathysubramanian; Asheesh K Singh
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.993

9.  A Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Framework for Sorghum Head Detection and Counting.

Authors:  Sambuddha Ghosal; Bangyou Zheng; Scott C Chapman; Andries B Potgieter; David R Jordan; Xuemin Wang; Asheesh K Singh; Arti Singh; Masayuki Hirafuji; Seishi Ninomiya; Baskar Ganapathysubramanian; Soumik Sarkar; Wei Guo
Journal:  Plant Phenomics       Date:  2019-06-27

10.  Panicle-SEG: a robust image segmentation method for rice panicles in the field based on deep learning and superpixel optimization.

Authors:  Xiong Xiong; Lingfeng Duan; Lingbo Liu; Haifu Tu; Peng Yang; Dan Wu; Guoxing Chen; Lizhong Xiong; Wanneng Yang; Qian Liu
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.993

View more
  1 in total

1.  High-throughput field crop phenotyping: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Seishi Ninomiya
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.014

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.