Literature DB >> 33728180

A Concise Review of the Multimodality Imaging Features of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Ali Morshid1, Elif S Duran2, Woongsoon J Choi1, Cihan Duran3.   

Abstract

The evaluation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is routinely performed using the multimodality imaging approach, including ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). Ultrasonography is the most frequently used imaging modality for the initial diagnosis of renal masses. The modality of choice for the characterization of the renal mass is multiphasic CT. Recent advances in CT technology have led to its widespread use as a powerful tool for preoperative planning, reducing the need for catheter angiography for the evaluation of vascular invasion. CT is also the standard imaging modality for staging and follow-up. MRI serves as a problem-solving tool in selected cases of undefined renal lesions. Newer MRI techniques, such as arterial spin labeling and diffusion-weighted imaging, have the potential to characterize renal lesions without contrast media, but these techniques warrant further investigation. PET may be a useful tool for evaluating patients with suspected metastatic disease, but it has modest sensitivity in the diagnosis and staging of RCC. The newer radiotracers may increase the accuracy of PET for RCC diagnosis and staging. In summary, the main imaging modality used for the characterization, staging, and surveillance of RCC is multiphasic CT. Other imaging modalities, such as MRI and PET, are used for selected indications.
Copyright © 2021, Morshid et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ct; mri; rcc

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728180      PMCID: PMC7946646          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  47 in total

1.  Differentiation of renal clear cell carcinoma and renal papillary carcinoma using quantitative CT enhancement parameters.

Authors:  Andrea J Ruppert-Kohlmayr; Martin Uggowitzer; Thomas Meissnitzer; Georg Ruppert
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance.

Authors:  Chaan S Ng; Christopher G Wood; Paul M Silverman; Nizar M Tannir; Pheroze Tamboli; Carl M Sandler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Review of renal cell carcinoma and its common subtypes in radiology.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Guan Huang; Winnie Fu; Zaahir Moloo; Safwat Girgis
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 4.  Epidemiologic aspects of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Joseph K McLaughlin; Loren Lipworth; Robert E Tarone
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 5.  99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the characterization of renal masses: a pictorial guide.

Authors:  Scott P Campbell; Antonios Tzortzakakis; Mehrbod S Javadi; Mattias Karlsson; Lilja B Solnes; Rimma Axelsson; Mohamad E Allaf; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Perfusion CT in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with interferon.

Authors:  Chaan S Ng; Xiaohong Wang; Silvana C Faria; E Lin; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Nizar M Tannir
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of staging renal cell carcinomas using multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Peter J Hallscheidt; Michael Bock; Gerd Riedasch; Ivan Zuna; Stefan O Schoenberg; Frank Autschbach; Martin Soder; Gerd Noeldge
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ivan Pedrosa; David C Alsop; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Differentiation of renal oncocytoma and renal clear cell carcinoma using relative CT enhancement ratio.

Authors:  An Ren; Feng Cai; Yan-Ning Shang; En-Sen Ma; Zhen-Guo Huang; Wu Wang; Yan Lu; Xue-Zhe Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  11C-acetate PET for early prediction of sunitinib response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alessandra Maleddu; Maria A Pantaleo; Paolo Castellucci; Maria Astorino; Cristina Nanni; Margherita Nannini; Fiorenza Busato; Monica Di Battista; Mohsen Farsad; Filippo Lodi; Stefano Boschi; Stefano Fanti; Guido Biasco
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2009 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.