| Literature DB >> 33727837 |
Guangli Zhu1, Yuting Zhang1, Jianjun Dong1, Yilin Liu1, Fang Zhao1, Ting Li1, Zhanrong Shi1, Yanping Zhang1, Na Song1, Wenyue Song1, Yuzhen Lv1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although obesity may affect reproductive functions, the molecular mechanisms of apoptosis-related biomarkers remain uncertain.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; apoptosis-related factors; biomarker; obesity; semen quality; sperm DNA
Year: 2021 PMID: 33727837 PMCID: PMC7955683 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S289923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Characteristics of the Study Population by Body Mass Index (N=54)
| Group (N) | 18.5≤BMI<24 (16) | 24≤BMI<28 (17) | BMI≥28 (21) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 29.38±3.57 | 30.29±5.43 | 32.38±5.26 | 0.164 |
| Infertility time (yr) | 2.69±1.08 | 2.06±0.90 | 3.52±3.14 | 0.111 |
| Abstinence time (days) | 4.44±1.03 | 4.88±1.93 | 5.00±1.79 | 0.576 |
| Semen vol (mL) | 3.06±1.19 | 2.49±1.03 | 3.06±0.79 | 0.156 |
| Sperm conc (× 106/mL) | 36.50±19.62 | 42.17±35.65 | 52.08±36.32 | 0.332 |
| Progressive motility (%) | 48.92±15.71 | 42.36±16.00 | 32.75±14.80* | 0.009 |
| Normal morphology (%) | 2.06±1.69 | 2.65±2.13 | 3.00±2.07 | 0.372 |
| Sperm DFI (%) | 12.49±7.28 | 12.89±9.48** | 30.97±18.10* | <0.001 |
| Sperm apoptosis (%) | 2.98±2.01 | 6.02±4.82** | 9.35±5.72* | 0.001 |
Notes: *Significant difference was found compared with 18.5≤BMI<24. **Significant difference was found compared with BMI≥28.
Figure 1Sperm DFI as determined using flow cytometry and assessed with use of a sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA). Three different levels of sperm DNA fragmentation rate are shown.
Figure 2Sperm apoptosis as determined using flow cytometry. (A and B) Lower levels of apoptosis (2.82% and 3.02%, respectively). (C) Higher levels of apoptosis (17.46%).
Figure 3Antibody array profiles and expression levels of apoptosis-related factors. (A) A Map of mouse inflammation antibody array G series I including 43 cytokines. (B) The levels of cytokines are proportional to their fluorescent intensities.
Figure 4Protein function annotation GO and KEGG pathway analysis in the overweight versus normal weight group. (A) DEPs. (B) Scatter plot of apoptosis-related factors with red indicating upregulation, blue downregulation and gray no difference. (C) Biological process (D) Cellular component and (E) Molecular function. (F) KEGG analysis of protein functions, linking genomic information with higher-order functional information.
Figure 5Protein function annotation GO and KEGG pathway analysis in the obesity versus normal weight group. (A) DEPs. (B) Scatter plot of apoptosis-related factors with red indicating upregulation, blue downregulation and gray no difference. (C) Biological process. (D) Cellular component and (E) Molecular function. (F) KEGG analysis of protein functions, linking genomic information with higher-order functional information.