Literature DB >> 33727706

Longitudinal agreement of four bioimpedance analyzers for detecting changes in raw bioimpedance during purposeful weight gain with resistance training.

Matthew T Stratton1, Robert W Smith1, Patrick S Harty1, Christian Rodriguez1, Baylor A Johnson1, Jacob R Dellinger1, Abegale D Williams1, Sarah J White1, Marqui L Benavides1, Grant M Tinsley2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to inherent errors involved in the transformation of raw bioelectrical variables to body fluids or composition estimates, the sole use of resistance (R), reactance (Xc), and phase angle (φ) has been advocated when quantifying longitudinal changes. The aim of this investigation was to assess the ability of four bioimpedance analyzers to detect raw bioimpedance changes induced by purposeful weight gain with resistance training.
METHODS: Twenty-one resistance trained males completed a 6-week lifestyle intervention with the aim of purposeful weight gain. Bioimpedance analysis was performed before and after the intervention using four different analyzers (MFBIAInBody: InBody 770; MFBIASECA: Seca mBCA 515/514; BIS: ImpediMed SFB7; SFBIA: RJL Quantum V) for the quantification of R, Xc, and φ at the 50-kHz frequency. Repeated measures ANOVA and follow up tests were performed.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed main effects of time and method for R, Xc, and φ (p ≤ 0.02), without significant time x method interactions (p ≥ 0.07). Follow up for time main effects indicated that, on average, R decreased by 4.5-5.8%, Xc decreased by 2.3-4.0%, and φ increased by 1.8-2.6% across time for all analyzers combined. However, varying levels of disagreement in absolute values were observed for each bioelectrical variable.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences in absolute bioelectrical values suggests that analyzers should not be used interchangeably, which holds particular importance when reference values are utilized. Despite absolute differences, analyzers with varying characteristics demonstrated similar abilities to detect changes in R, Xc, and φ over time.

Year:  2021        PMID: 33727706     DOI: 10.1038/s41430-020-00811-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  33 in total

1.  Development of bioelectrical impedance analysis prediction equations for body composition with the use of a multicomponent model for use in epidemiologic surveys.

Authors:  Shumei S Sun; W Cameron Chumlea; Steven B Heymsfield; Henry C Lukaski; Dale Schoeller; Karl Friedl; Robert J Kuczmarski; Katherine M Flegal; Clifford L Johnson; Van S Hubbard
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Equivalence of information from single frequency v. bioimpedance spectroscopy in bodybuilders.

Authors:  Antonio Piccoli; Giordano Pastori; Marta Codognotto; Antonio Paoli
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 3.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition assessment: reflections on accuracy, clinical utility, and standardisation.

Authors:  Leigh C Ward
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Lack of agreement of in vivo raw bioimpedance measurements obtained from two single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance devices.

Authors:  Analiza M Silva; Catarina N Matias; Catarina L Nunes; Diana A Santos; Elisabetta Marini; Henry C Lukaski; Luís B Sardinha
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 5.  Body composition in athletes and sports nutrition: an examination of the bioimpedance analysis technique.

Authors:  J R Moon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 6.  Evolution of bioimpedance: a circuitous journey from estimation of physiological function to assessment of body composition and a return to clinical research.

Authors:  H C Lukaski
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 7.  Assessment of adult malnutrition and prognosis with bioelectrical impedance analysis: phase angle and impedance ratio.

Authors:  Henry C Lukaski; Ursula G Kyle; Jens Kondrup
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  Phase angle and its determinants in healthy subjects: influence of body composition.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Thiago G Barbosa-Silva; Renata M Bielemann; Dympna Gallagher; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 9.  The theory and fundamentals of bioimpedance analysis in clinical status monitoring and diagnosis of diseases.

Authors:  Sami F Khalil; Mas S Mohktar; Fatimah Ibrahim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Changes in total and segmental bioelectrical resistance are correlated with whole-body and segmental changes in lean soft tissue following a resistance training intervention.

Authors:  Grant M Tinsley; Patrick S Harty; M Lane Moore; Jozo Grgic; Analiza M Silva; Luis B Sardinha
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.150

View more
  8 in total

1.  Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis Discriminates Aerobic Power in Futsal Players: The Role of Body Composition.

Authors:  Catarina N Matias; Francesco Campa; Giuseppe Cerullo; Giuseppe D'Antona; Rita Giro; João Faleiro; Joana F Reis; Cristina P Monteiro; Maria J Valamatos; Filipe J Teixeira
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25

Review 2.  Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for the Assessment of Body Composition in Sarcopenia and Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Stefano Sbrignadello; Christian Göbl; Andrea Tura
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis versus reference methods in the assessment of body composition in athletes.

Authors:  Francesco Campa; Luis Alberto Gobbo; Silvia Stagi; Leticia Trindade Cyrino; Stefania Toselli; Elisabetta Marini; Giuseppe Coratella
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Reference Percentiles for Bioelectrical Phase Angle in Athletes.

Authors:  Francesco Campa; Diana Maria Thomas; Krista Watts; Nicholas Clark; Daniel Baller; Thomas Morin; Stefania Toselli; Josely Correa Koury; Giovanni Melchiorri; Angela Andreoli; Gabriele Mascherini; Cristian Petri; Luis Bettencourt Sardinha; Analiza Monica Silva
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08

5.  Association between Gut Microbiota and Body Composition in Japanese General Population: A Focus on Gut Microbiota and Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Yoshikuni Sugimura; Akira Kanda; Kaori Sawada; Kyi Mar Wai; Asano Tanabu; Naoki Ozato; Tatsuyuki Midorikawa; Takayoshi Hisada; Shigeyuki Nakaji; Kazushige Ihara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Does Body Position Influence Bioelectrical Impedance? An Observational Pilot Study.

Authors:  Paweł Więch; Filip Wołoszyn; Patrycja Trojnar; Mateusz Skórka; Dariusz Bazaliński
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Can Bodybuilding Peak Week Manipulations Favorably Affect Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Thickness, and Related Body Composition Variables? A Case Study.

Authors:  Christopher Barakat; Guillermo Escalante; Scott W Stevenson; Joshua T Bradshaw; Andrew Barsuhn; Grant M Tinsley; Joseph Walters
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05

8.  A Novel Plant-Based Protein Has Similar Effects Compared to Whey Protein on Body Composition, Strength, Power, and Aerobic Performance in Professional and Semi-Professional Futsal Players.

Authors:  Filipe J Teixeira; Catarina N Matias; João Faleiro; Rita Giro; Joana Pires; Helena Figueiredo; Raquel Carvalhinho; Cristina P Monteiro; Joana F Reis; Maria J Valamatos; Vítor H Teixeira; Brad J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-07-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.