Literature DB >> 33727494

Response to comments: Making the decision to donate eye organs: Perspectives from the families of the deceased in Madurai, India.

Ganesh-Babu B Subburaman1, John H Kempen2, Saravanan Duraisamy3, Balakrishnan Vijayakumar1, Vijayakumar Valaguru1, Venkatesh Prajna Namperumalsamy3, Thulasiraj D Ravilla1, Sachin Gupta4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33727494      PMCID: PMC8012928          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_3234_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, We thank the authors[1] for your interest in our article.[2] We appreciate the suggestions for strengthening donation outcomes from counseling sessions with family members of the deceased. Our research focused primarily on understanding factors that influenced the donation decision, and factors that could have influenced nondonors to donate. Your proposal of a structured approach to eliciting ideas, concerns, and an expectations model[3] could be applicable in this context of eye donations; these were explored to some extent in our study as well. From data that we did not report in the published article due to reasons of space, we obtain additional insights about concerns and motivations of non-donors. Table 1 below shows that 74% of non-donor families expressed willingness to donate their own eyes in the coming days, 13% were likely to decide based on the situation, and only 13% were not willing to donate in the future. The reasons for not being willing to donate even in the future were money, caste, did not want to cause injury etc., [Table 2]. Additionally, Table 3 below shows the most important reason reported by non-donors for negligence in donating on the most recent occasion. We also asked about specific concerns that had been identified in focus groups conducted before the structured interviews. For instance, Table 4 shows the results regarding apprehensions about disfigurement of the donor‘s face.
Table 1

Response of non-donor family members to the question "Will you or your family members donate their eyes in the coming days"

Willingnessn%
Yes19074.2
No3312.9
Depends upon the situation3312.9
Table 2

Reasons for not being willing to donate even in the future

Reasonsn%
Family members and relatives will not agree135.1
Didn’t want to donate/Didn’t want to cause injury72.7
Caste52.0
Eye problem41.6
Will see in future/Decision not yet taken/According to situation31.2
Money10.4
Table 3

Most important reason for negligence among nondonors

Reasons for negligencen%
We never thought about it12548.8
Lack of awareness4919.1
No one approached us176.6
We thought that the deceased is unfit due to age, illness114.3
Eye problem103.9
We don’t want to remove eyes from the body93.5
We don’t know where and whom to contact72.7
Opposition from the family/lack of family support62.3
No one is here to take a decision31.2
Caste/religion-based reasons31.2
We took a delayed decision31.2
Cancer31.2
Unexpected death31.2
Don’t want to cause injury20.8
No one has donated eyes in my family20.8
Donated full body10.4
Family member objection10.4
Lack of time10.4
Table 4

Response of deceased family members to the question "Do you think eye donation disfigures the face of the donor after removal of eye?"

Donor n (%) (n=76)Non-Donor n (%) (n=256)Total n (%) (n=332)P
Yes10 (13.2)89 (34.8)99 (29.8)
No66 (86.8)54 (21.1)120 (36.1)0.0003
I don’t know-113 (44.1)113 (34.1)
Response of non-donor family members to the question "Will you or your family members donate their eyes in the coming days" Reasons for not being willing to donate even in the future Most important reason for negligence among nondonors Response of deceased family members to the question "Do you think eye donation disfigures the face of the donor after removal of eye?"

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  3 in total

1.  Patients' ideas, concerns, and expectations (ICE) in general practice: impact on prescribing.

Authors:  Jan Matthys; Glyn Elwyn; Marc Van Nuland; Georges Van Maele; An De Sutter; Marc De Meyere; Myriam Deveugele
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Comments: Pendleton's Ideas, Concerns and Expectations model for improving outcomes through eye donation counseling.

Authors:  Imogen Milner; Naveed Hussain; Princess Imoru; Haroon Shah
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Making the decision to donate eyes: Perspectives from the families of the deceased in Madurai, India.

Authors:  Ganesh-Babu B Subburaman; John H Kempen; Saravanan Durairaj; Vijayakumar Balakrishnan; Vijayakumar Valaguru; Venkatesh Prajna Namperumalsamy; Ravilla Duraisamy Thulasiraj; Sachin Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.