| Literature DB >> 33727440 |
Komal Agarwal1, Anand Vinekar2, Parijat Chandra3, Tapas Ranjan Padhi4, Sameera Nayak5, Sushma Jayanna1, Bhavik Panchal6, Subhadra Jalali1, Taraprasad Das1.
Abstract
Recent decade has seen a shift in the causes of childhood blinding diseases from anterior segment to retinal disease in both developed and developing countries. The common retinal disorders are retinopathy of prematurity and vitreoretinal infections in neonates, congenital anomalies in infants, and vascular retinopathies including type 1 diabetes, tumors, and inherited retinal diseases in children (up to 12 years). Retinal imaging helps in diagnosis, management, follow up and prognostication in all these disorders. These imaging modalities include fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, ultrasonography, retinal vascular and structural studies, and electrodiagnosis. Over the decades there has been tremendous advances both in design (compact, multifunctional, tele-consult capable) and technology (wide- and ultra-wide field and noninvasive retinal angiography). These new advances have application in most of the pediatric retinal diseases though at most times the designs of new devices have remained confined to use in adults. Poor patient cooperation and insufficient attention span in children demand careful crafting of the devices. The newer attempts of hand-held retinal diagnostic devices are welcome additions in this direction. While much has been done, there is still much to do in the coming years. One of the compelling and immediate needs is the pediatric version of optical coherence tomography angiography. These needs and demands would increase many folds in future. A sound policy could be the simultaneous development of adult and pediatric version of all ophthalmic diagnostic devices, coupled with capacity building of trained medical personnel.Entities:
Keywords: Newborn eye screening; pediatric retina; pediatric retinal diseases; retinal imaging
Year: 2021 PMID: 33727440 PMCID: PMC8012979 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1917_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Retinal diagnostic tests in pediatric disorders
| Disease | Diagnostic Tests | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USG/UBM | FP | FFA | AF | OCT | OCTA | Electrodiagnostics | |
| Retinopathy of Prematurity | + | + | + | - | + | + | - |
| Retinal vascular diseases | + | + | + | - | + | + | + |
| Retinal detachment | + | + | + | - | - | - | - |
| Intraocular tumors | + | + | + | - | + | - | - |
| Inherited retinal dystrophies | - | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Congenital developmental anomalies | + | + | - | - | + | + | - |
| Inflammatory disorders | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Trauma | + | + | - | - | + | - | + |
AF - Autofluorescence; FP - Fundus photography; OCT - Optical coherence tomography; OCTA - Optical coherence tomography angiography; UBM - Ultrasound biomicroscopy; USG - Ultrasound sonography
Figure 1A 2- year old female, born preterm at 32 weeks, presented with bilateral leucocoria. She was referred with a diagnosis of Stage V retinopathy of prematurity. (a) An immersion ultrasonography of left eye shows a mass lesion in the posterior half of the globe. (b-d) Transverse scans of superior, nasal and temporal half showing a mass lesion with intraretinal calcification. She was diagnosed with retinoblastoma and was treated for the same
Indications of ultrasonography in pediatric retinal diseases
| Category | Disorder |
|---|---|
| A. Conditions preventing fundoscopic examination | Corneal scar, Corneal edema, Sclerocornea, Hyphaema, Exudates in anterior chamber, Cataract, retrolental membranes, leucocoria, Vitreous haemorrhage, Vitreous haze |
| B. Congenital Anomalies | Anophthalmos, Microphthalmos, Nanophthalmos, Peter’s anomaly, Persistent fetal vasculature, Uveal Coloboma, posterior Staphyloma |
| C. Retinal Detachment | Retinopathy of prematurity, Familial exudative vitreo-retinopathy, Retinal dysplasias, Incontinentia pigmenti, Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, Coat’s disease, mentally challenged and syndromic conditions that predispose to retinal detachment |
| D. Ocular Tumours | Retinoblastoma, Hamartoma, Osteoma, Ciliary Body tumours, choroidal hemangiomas, and others |
| E. Inflammation | Uveitis, Endophthalmitis, Toxocariasis, Cysticercosis, Intermediate uveitis, Calcification of ocular coats |
| F. Trauma | Cyclodialysis, Choroidal and Retinal detachment, Vitreous haemorrhage, Optic nerve Avulsion, Intraocular or Intraorbital Foreign bodies. |
Technical comparison between Retcam and 3Nethra Neo
| Features | 3Nethra Neo ™ | RetCam™ |
|---|---|---|
| Probe design | Single, monolithic hand held | Detachable front, optical hand held |
| Probe weight | 340 g (740 g with cable) | 800 g |
| Machine weight | 6.5 kg | 30 kg |
| Portability | Designed portable (compact carrycase) | Possible. On wheels |
| Image resolution | 2040 x 2040 pixels/inch | 1600 x1600 pixels/inch |
| Field of view | Maximum 120 degrees | Maximum 130 degrees |
| Focus | Motionless focus with liquid lens system | Motorized focus |
| Image capture | By foot pedal and on screen Video and still | By foot pedal or using keyboard Video and still |
| Light source | LED | Halogen |
Figure 2Wide field fundus photograph of right eye of a preterm neonate showing active neovascularization in zone 1. (a) Picture taken on Retcam with about 130 degrees of field, superior and inferior edges appear cropped. (b) Picture of the same eye taken on “Neo” with about 120 degrees of field in a circular capture
Figure 3(a) Ultra-wide field fundus photograph of a 28 weeks GA neonate with APROP (b) Follow up image of the same eye 2 weeks post intravitreal avastin showing regression of plus disease. (c) Ultra-wide field fundus photograph of a 4 year old boy with submacular exudates and peripheral telangiectasia in nasal quadrant, He was diagnosed as Coat‘s retinopathy and focal laser was done to the telangiectatic vessels. Inferior view of the fundus is limited due to artefacts due to eye lashes. (d) Follow up image of the same eye showing regressed macular exudates and telangiectatic vessels post focal laser
Figure 4A 14- year old female presented with bilateral gradual decrease in vision. The best corrected visual acuity was 20/200. (a) Color fundus image shows a central area of RPE atrophic changes with fleck like changes around fovea. (b) Autofluorescence shows central dark hypofluorescence corresponding to the area of RPE atrophy and multiple hyper- and hypo-fluorescent fleck like deposits around fovea, more prominent than the color fundus photo. She was diagnosed with Stargardt‘s disease
Figure 5Half zone APROP. (a) Left eye color fundus image shows limited details of vascular retina. (b) Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) in the same patient shows vascular retina extent and neovascularization status, not clearly apparent on fundus examination. (c) Wide field FFA shows peripheral avascular retina and neovascular leakage in right eye of 8- year old child presenting with recurrent vitreous hemorrhage
Commonly used electrophysiological tests and the cells targeted by them
| Targeted Cells | Tests |
|---|---|
| Pan retinal response (Outer + Inner retina) | Full field Electroretinogram or simply ERG |
| Pan retinal response (RPE & PR complex) | Electro-oculogram |
| Regional response: Topography of responses from predefined points within a specific region (cone + cone bipolar cells) | Multifocal ERG |
| Regional response: as a whole (Macular ganglion cells +/-PR) | Pattern ERG |
| Evaluation of functional integrity of retino striate pathway | Flash VEP |
| Pattern VEP |
Commonly used electrodiagnostic tests, waveforms, their origin and their maturation with age
| Full field ERG | Individual components and their origin | Maturation of responses with age |
|---|---|---|
| Scotopic 0.01: Dominated by b wave Rod bipolar cells, driven by rod photoreceptors | ERG waveforms start appearing at 30 wks of GA & get completed by 6 m of age. 1 Maturation: Rapid during initial 4 m reach adult level by 1 year and stabilizing by 3 to 4 years of age. 1 | |
| Scotopic 3.0: Negative ‘a’ wave followed by a positive ‘b’ wave; a-rod and rod on bipolar cells; b-rod on bipolar cells | The waveforms mature by shortening their latencies and reducing their amplitudes. 1 | |
| Scotopic 10.0 - Same as scotopic 3.0 with a wave being steeper and more pronounced | ||
| Oscillatory potential: Series of 3 to 4 waves, originate from Amacrine cells | ||
| Photopic 3.0 ERG: Negative a wave followed by a positive b wave, a: cone & off bipolar cells; b-cone on & off bipolar cells | ||
| Photopic 30 Hz flicker :Cone on and off bipolar cells | ||
| Series of square waves in dark and light generated by RPE-Photoreceptor complex. Light peak (Lp) Dark trough (Dt) ratio or Arden ratio is the one commonly used | Lp: Dt ratio reach adult level in infancy. It decrease by 0.13 in every 10 yrs from 10-60 yrs of age. 6 | |
| Multiple similar looking waveforms originating from cone mediated on bipolar cells from the central 40-50 degree of retina at the posterior pole. Individual responses consist of negative (N1), positive (P1) and negative (N2) waves. | Responses from the central retina are smaller with longer latency in early life. Become adult like by school going age. 7,8 | |
| Mass response from a specific region in the posterior pole. P50 (Positive deflection at 50 ms) and N95 (Negative deflection at 95 ms) are affected by retinal ganglion cells while P50 has some distal retinal contribution | Responses become adult like from 6 m (latency) to 6 yrs of age (amplitude) | |
| Series of negative and positive responses generated in the visual cortex in response to bright flash-NI, P1, N2, P2. Gives a crude assessment about light transmission along retinostrate pathway | Adult like response by school going age | |
| Response to a pattern reversal stimulus consist of a negative (N75), positive (P100) and negative (N135) wave. P100 amplitude and latency can get affected in various neuro ophthalmic, macular and panretinal pathologies | Mature by 2-3 years |
ERG - Electroretinogram; GA-Gestational age; EOG - Electro-oculogram, mfERG-Multifocal ERG; PERG-Pattern ERG; VEP-Visually Evoked Potential; PVEP-Pattern VEP
Figure 6A 6- year old girl presented with reduction in vision in both eyes; best corrected vision was 20/60 in both eyes. She was able to read 20 of 23 plates in Isihara color vision chart. (a and b) The fundus was unremarkable; (c and d) very subtle photo receptor irregularity on OCT. (e and f) A full field electroretinogram showed normal scotopic and photopic responses while mfERG showed hypovoltaged subnormal responses from central macula. This confirmed the diagnosis of occult macular dystrophy