Thanh Tam Tran1,2, Adrian Sleigh3, Cathy Banwell3. 1. National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Building 62 Mills Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. tam.tran@anu.edu.au. 2. Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia. tam.tran@anu.edu.au. 3. National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Building 62 Mills Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traffic injuries place a significant burden on mortality, morbidity and health services worldwide. Qualitative factors are important determinants of health but they are often ignored in the study of injury and corresponding development of prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS), especially in developing country settings. Here we report our research on sociocultural factors shaping pathways to hospital care for those injured on the roads and streets of Vietnam. METHODS: Qualitative fieldwork on pathways to emergency care of traffic injury was carried out from March to August 2016 in four hospitals in Vietnam, two in Ho Chi Minh City and two in Hanoi. Forty-eight traffic injured patients and their families were interviewed at length using a semi-structured topic guide regarding their journey to the hospital, help received, personal beliefs and other matters that they thought important. Transcribed interviews were analysed thematically guided by the three-delay model of emergency care. RESULTS: Seeking care was the first delay and reflected concerns over money and possessions. The family was central for transporting and caring for the patient but their late arrival prolonged time spent at the scene. Reaching care was the second delay and detours to inappropriate primary care services had postponed the eventual trip to the hospital. Ambulance services were misunderstood and believed to be suboptimal, making taxis the preferred form of transport. Receiving care at the hospital was the third delay and both patients and families distrusted service quality. Request to transfer to other hospitals often created more conflict. Overall, sociocultural beliefs of groups of people were very influential. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis using the three-delay model for road traffic injury in Vietnam has revealed important barriers to emergency care. Hospital care needs to improve to enhance patient experiences and trust. Socioculture affects each of the three delays and needs to inform thinking of future developments of the EMS system, especially for countries with limited resources.
BACKGROUND: Traffic injuries place a significant burden on mortality, morbidity and health services worldwide. Qualitative factors are important determinants of health but they are often ignored in the study of injury and corresponding development of prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS), especially in developing country settings. Here we report our research on sociocultural factors shaping pathways to hospital care for those injured on the roads and streets of Vietnam. METHODS: Qualitative fieldwork on pathways to emergency care of traffic injury was carried out from March to August 2016 in four hospitals in Vietnam, two in Ho Chi Minh City and two in Hanoi. Forty-eight traffic injured patients and their families were interviewed at length using a semi-structured topic guide regarding their journey to the hospital, help received, personal beliefs and other matters that they thought important. Transcribed interviews were analysed thematically guided by the three-delay model of emergency care. RESULTS: Seeking care was the first delay and reflected concerns over money and possessions. The family was central for transporting and caring for the patient but their late arrival prolonged time spent at the scene. Reaching care was the second delay and detours to inappropriate primary care services had postponed the eventual trip to the hospital. Ambulance services were misunderstood and believed to be suboptimal, making taxis the preferred form of transport. Receiving care at the hospital was the third delay and both patients and families distrusted service quality. Request to transfer to other hospitals often created more conflict. Overall, sociocultural beliefs of groups of people were very influential. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis using the three-delay model for road traffic injury in Vietnam has revealed important barriers to emergency care. Hospital care needs to improve to enhance patient experiences and trust. Socioculture affects each of the three delays and needs to inform thinking of future developments of the EMS system, especially for countries with limited resources.
Entities:
Keywords:
EMS; Emergency medical services; Lower-middle income country; Prehospital care; Three-delay model of care; Traffic injury; Vietnam
Authors: Hadley K H Wesson; Kent A Stevens; Abdulgafoor M Bachani; Stephen Mogere; Daniel Akungah; Jackim Nyamari; John Masasabi Wekesa; Adnan A Hyder Journal: Qual Health Res Date: 2015-01-06
Authors: Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli; Marie Hasselberg; Hamidreza Khankeh; Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh; Eva Johansson Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2010-11-08
Authors: Antony Gatebe Kironji; Peter Hodkinson; Sarah Stewart de Ramirez; Trisha Anest; Lee Wallis; Junaid Razzak; Alexander Jenson; Bhakti Hansoti Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Morgan C Broccoli; Emilie J B Calvello; Alexander P Skog; Benjamin Wachira; Lee A Wallis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Son Ngoc Do; Chinh Quoc Luong; Dung Thi Pham; My Ha Nguyen; Tra Thanh Ton; Quoc Trong Ai Hoang; Dat Tuan Nguyen; Thao Thi Ngoc Pham; Hanh Trong Hoang; Dai Quoc Khuong; Quan Huu Nguyen; Tuan Anh Nguyen; Tung Thanh Tran; Long Duc Vu; Chi Van Nguyen; Bryan Francis McNally; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Anh Dat Nguyen Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2021-11-23