Maricel Podio1, Carolina Colono1, Lorena Siena1, Juan Pablo A Ortiz1, Silvina Claudia Pessino2. 1. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario (IICAR-CONICET-UNR), Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Campo Experimental Villarino, (S2125ZAA) Zavalla, Santa Fe, Argentina. 2. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario (IICAR-CONICET-UNR), Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Campo Experimental Villarino, (S2125ZAA) Zavalla, Santa Fe, Argentina. pessino@arnet.com.ar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Apomixis, an asexual mode of plant reproduction, is a genetically heritable trait evolutionarily related to sexuality, which enables the fixation of heterozygous genetic combinations through the development of maternal seeds. Recently, reference floral transcriptomes were generated from sexual and apomictic biotypes of Paspalum notatum, one of the most well-known plant models for the study of apomixis. However, the transcriptome dynamics, the occurrence of apomixis vs. sexual expression heterochronicity across consecutive developmental steps and the orientation of transcription (sense/antisense) remain unexplored. RESULTS: We produced 24 Illumina TruSeq®/ Hiseq 1500 sense/antisense floral transcriptome libraries covering four developmental stages (premeiosis, meiosis, postmeiosis, and anthesis) in biological triplicates, from an obligate apomictic and a full sexual genotype. De novo assemblies with Trinity yielded 103,699 and 100,114 transcripts for the apomictic and sexual samples respectively. A global comparative analysis involving reads from all developmental stages revealed 19,352 differentially expressed sense transcripts, of which 13,205 (68%) and 6147 (32%) were up- and down-regulated in apomictic samples with respect to the sexual ones. Interestingly, 100 differentially expressed antisense transcripts were detected, 55 (55%) of them up- and 45 (45%) down-regulated in apomictic libraries. A stage-by-stage comparative analysis showed a higher number of differentially expressed candidates due to heterochronicity discrimination: the highest number of differential sense transcripts was detected at premeiosis (23,651), followed by meiosis (22,830), postmeiosis (19,100), and anthesis (17,962), while the highest number of differential antisense transcripts were detected at anthesis (495), followed by postmeiosis (164), meiosis (120) and premeiosis (115). Members of the AP2, ARF, MYB and WRKY transcription factor families, as well as the auxin, jasmonate and cytokinin plant hormone families appeared broadly deregulated. Moreover, the chronological expression profile of several well-characterized apomixis controllers was examined in detail. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides a quantitative sense/antisense gene expression catalogue covering several subsequent reproductive developmental stages from premeiosis to anthesis for apomictic and sexual P. notatum, with potential to reveal heterochronic expression between reproductive types and discover sense/antisense mediated regulation. We detected a contrasting transcriptional and hormonal control in apomixis and sexuality as well as specific sense/antisense modulation occurring at the onset of parthenogenesis.
BACKGROUND: Apomixis, an asexual mode of plant reproduction, is a genetically heritable trait evolutionarily related to sexuality, which enables the fixation of heterozygous genetic combinations through the development of maternal seeds. Recently, reference floral transcriptomes were generated from sexual and apomictic biotypes of Paspalum notatum, one of the most well-known plant models for the study of apomixis. However, the transcriptome dynamics, the occurrence of apomixis vs. sexual expression heterochronicity across consecutive developmental steps and the orientation of transcription (sense/antisense) remain unexplored. RESULTS: We produced 24 Illumina TruSeq®/ Hiseq 1500 sense/antisense floral transcriptome libraries covering four developmental stages (premeiosis, meiosis, postmeiosis, and anthesis) in biological triplicates, from an obligate apomictic and a full sexual genotype. De novo assemblies with Trinity yielded 103,699 and 100,114 transcripts for the apomictic and sexual samples respectively. A global comparative analysis involving reads from all developmental stages revealed 19,352 differentially expressed sense transcripts, of which 13,205 (68%) and 6147 (32%) were up- and down-regulated in apomictic samples with respect to the sexual ones. Interestingly, 100 differentially expressed antisense transcripts were detected, 55 (55%) of them up- and 45 (45%) down-regulated in apomictic libraries. A stage-by-stage comparative analysis showed a higher number of differentially expressed candidates due to heterochronicity discrimination: the highest number of differential sense transcripts was detected at premeiosis (23,651), followed by meiosis (22,830), postmeiosis (19,100), and anthesis (17,962), while the highest number of differential antisense transcripts were detected at anthesis (495), followed by postmeiosis (164), meiosis (120) and premeiosis (115). Members of the AP2, ARF, MYB and WRKY transcription factor families, as well as the auxin, jasmonate and cytokinin plant hormone families appeared broadly deregulated. Moreover, the chronological expression profile of several well-characterized apomixis controllers was examined in detail. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides a quantitative sense/antisense gene expression catalogue covering several subsequent reproductive developmental stages from premeiosis to anthesis for apomictic and sexual P. notatum, with potential to reveal heterochronic expression between reproductive types and discover sense/antisense mediated regulation. We detected a contrasting transcriptional and hormonal control in apomixis and sexuality as well as specific sense/antisense modulation occurring at the onset of parthenogenesis.
Authors: Brian J Haas; Alexie Papanicolaou; Moran Yassour; Manfred Grabherr; Philip D Blood; Joshua Bowden; Matthew Brian Couger; David Eccles; Bo Li; Matthias Lieber; Matthew D MacManes; Michael Ott; Joshua Orvis; Nathalie Pochet; Francesco Strozzi; Nathan Weeks; Rick Westerman; Thomas William; Colin N Dewey; Robert Henschel; Richard D LeDuc; Nir Friedman; Aviv Regev Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Robert M Waterhouse; Mathieu Seppey; Felipe A Simão; Mosè Manni; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Guennadi Klioutchnikov; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov Journal: Mol Biol Evol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 16.240
Authors: Micaela Mancini; Hugo Permingeat; Carolina Colono; Lorena Siena; Fulvio Pupilli; Celeste Azzaro; Diva Maria de Alencar Dusi; Vera Tavares de Campos Carneiro; Maricel Podio; José Guillermo Seijo; Ana María González; Silvina A Felitti; Juan Pablo A Ortiz; Olivier Leblanc; Silvina C Pessino Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Carolina Colono; Juan Pablo A Ortiz; Hugo R Permingeat; Eduardo Daniel Souza Canada; Lorena A Siena; Nicolás Spoto; Florencia Galdeano; Francisco Espinoza; Olivier Leblanc; Silvina C Pessino Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 5.753