Literature DB >> 33725994

The mediating role of patient satisfaction and perceived quality of healthcare in the emergency department.

Alina Abidova1, Pedro Alcântara da Silva2, Sérgio Moreira3.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this research was to identify whether a certain set of drivers of satisfaction/perceived quality of healthcare (PQHC) could indirectly affect patients' confidence/trust in the emergency department (ED).Patients were seen at an ED in the public hospital in Lisbon, Portugal between January and December 2016. Data were collected between May and November 2017, using a questionnaire, by mail or e-mail. The total sample size comprised 382 patients. The data analysis included structural equation modeling to test the conceptual model with specific drivers of satisfaction/PQHC (privacy; accessibility and availability; doctors; meeting expectations; waiting time for triage [perception]; waiting time to be called back by the doctor following examinations and/or tests [perception]; information about possible delays in receiving treatment/waiting times) and with the main outcome (confidence/trust in the ED) using path analysis.The analysis of the coefficients revealed that all the mediated paths are statistically significant (P ≤ .05). Although, altogether, the direct paths did not prove statistically significant (P > .05), the overall satisfaction with doctors (P ≤ .01) and meeting expectations (P = .01) can still directly explain the confidence/trust in the ED without the mediating role of satisfaction and PQHC. Hence, overall satisfaction with doctors and meeting expectations can influence, both directly and indirectly, confidence/trust in the ED. All other variables can only indirectly affect confidence/trust in the ED, either through PQHC or through satisfaction.Even though there are more variables that influence confidence/trust in the ED through PQHC (1)waiting time to be called back by the doctor following examinations and/or tests [perception]; 2) privacy; 3) accessibility and availability; 4) doctors; 5) meeting expectations than through satisfaction (1)waiting time for triage [perception]; 2) information about possible delays in receiving treatment/waiting times; 3) doctors; 4) meeting expectations), we observe the strongest contribution in the mediation model through satisfaction, which reveals its dominant role over PQHC.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33725994      PMCID: PMC7982240          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


  57 in total

1.  Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues.

Authors:  Mark A Hall; Fabian Camacho; Elizabeth Dugan; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Distrust of the health care system and self-reported health in the United States.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Abigail Rose; Nikki Peters; Judith A Long; Suzanne McMurphy; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Researching trust relations in health care: conceptual and methodological challenges--introduction.

Authors:  Michael Calnan; Rosemary Rowe
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2006

4.  CHull as an alternative to AIC and BIC in the context of mixtures of factor analyzers.

Authors:  Kirsten Bulteel; Tom F Wilderjans; Francis Tuerlinckx; Eva Ceulemans
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-09

5.  How much does trust really matter? A study of the longitudinal effects of trust and decision-making preferences on diabetic patient outcomes.

Authors:  Yin-Yang Lee; Julia L Lin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-01-26

6.  Training physicians to increase patient trust.

Authors:  D H Thom
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Trust in the physician-patient relationship in developing healthcare settings: a quantitative exploration.

Authors:  Vijayaprasad Gopichandran; Satish Kumar Chetlapalli
Journal:  Indian J Med Ethics       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Past experience, 'shadow of the future', and patient trust: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Carolyn Tarrant; Andrew M Colman; Tim Stokes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Johanna Birkhäuer; Jens Gaab; Joe Kossowsky; Sebastian Hasler; Peter Krummenacher; Christoph Werner; Heike Gerger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Doctor's perception of doctor-patient relationships in emergency departments: What roles do gender and ethnicity play?

Authors:  Birgit Babitsch; Tanja Braun; Theda Borde; Matthias David
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  Emergency Nursing-Care Patient Satisfaction Scale (Enpss): Development and Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale with Emergency Room Nursing.

Authors:  Junpei Haruna; Naomi Minamoto; Mizue Shiromaru; Yukiko Taguchi; Natsuko Makino; Naoki Kanda; Hiromi Uchida
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.