Literature DB >> 33725988

Adverse events from pharmacopuncture treatment in Korea: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

Jae Eun Park1, Sohyeon Kang1, Bo-Hyoung Jang1,2, Yong-Cheol Shin1,2, Seong-Gyu Ko1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacopuncture is a combination of acupuncture and herbal medicine, which involves the injection of herbal extracts into acupuncture points (acupoints). Pharmacopuncture has become one of the major therapeutic tools used in Korea; however, safety is one of the major concerns associated with it. We aim to systematically review clinical studies on the adverse events of pharmacopuncture in Korea.
METHODS: To collect data on the incidence and characteristics of adverse events (AEs) and to evaluate pharmacopuncture safety, 2 or more researchers will conduct a comprehensive search of pertinent English and Korean databases using the keywords "pharmacopuncture" and "adverse events." Regardless of the participants' conditions or treatment types, we will include clinical studies on the AEs of pharmacopuncture. Studies that were not conducted in Korea, and acupoint injections containing Western medications, vitamins, or autologous serum will be excluded from this study. The severity of AEs will be classified using the common terminology criteria for adverse events, and the causality between pharmacopuncture and AEs will be assessed using the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) causality scale. The quality of identifying and reporting the AEs will be assessed using the McHarm scale. The risk of selection bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and the risk of bias for non-randomized studies tools. Studies will be assessed for heterogeneity utilizing Higgins's I2 statistics, and the risk of publication bias will be assessed and expressed in the form of a contour-enhanced funnel plot. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Comprehensive investigation of all types of clinical studies in Korea will provide clearer evidence of the safety of pharmacopuncture. The results of this study will be useful for traditional medical doctors and patients who use such treatments and interventions.Systematic Review Registration: Open Science Foundation (osf.io/umhyz).
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33725988      PMCID: PMC7982247          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


  7 in total

Review 1.  Acupuncture-related adverse events: a systematic review of the Chinese literature.

Authors:  Junhua Zhang; Hongcai Shang; Xiumei Gao; Edzard Ernst
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Naomi Aronson; David Atkins; Afisi S Ismaila; Pasqualina Santaguida; David H Smith; Evelyn Whitlock; Timothy J Wilt; David Moher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

4.  RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Jelena Savović; Matthew J Page; Roy G Elbers; Natalie S Blencowe; Isabelle Boutron; Christopher J Cates; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Mark S Corbett; Sandra M Eldridge; Jonathan R Emberson; Miguel A Hernán; Sally Hopewell; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Daniela R Junqueira; Peter Jüni; Jamie J Kirkham; Toby Lasserson; Tianjing Li; Alexandra McAleenan; Barnaby C Reeves; Sasha Shepperd; Ian Shrier; Lesley A Stewart; Kate Tilling; Ian R White; Penny F Whiting; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-08-28

5.  Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity.

Authors:  Soo Young Kim; Ji Eun Park; Yoon Jae Lee; Hyun-Ju Seo; Seung-Soo Sheen; Seokyung Hahn; Bo-Hyoung Jang; Hee-Jung Son
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Risk associated with bee venom therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeong Hwan Park; Bo Kyung Yim; Jun-Hwan Lee; Sanghun Lee; Tae-Hun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Pharmacopuncture in Korea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jimin Park; Hyangsook Lee; Byung-Cheul Shin; Myeong Soo Lee; Boryang Kim; Jong-In Kim
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.629

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.