Literature DB >> 33725328

Sagittal radiographic parameters in the presence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV): relationships between measurements using the upper vs lower transitional vertebra.

Cole J Homer1, Jonathan N Sembrano2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Optimization of spinopelvic sagittal parameters in spinal deformity surgery have been shown to correlate with surgical outcomes. Commonly used parameters include pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL) and PI-LL mismatch. Presence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) introduces variability regarding which endplate is considered the sacral endplate. This study aimed to determine the mathematical relationships between measurements using the upper transitional vertebra (UTV) versus the lower transitional vertebra (LTV).
METHODS: The property that internal angles of a triangle sum to 180° was used to create a system of equations to resolve the relationship between the PI-LL mismatch of the UTV and of the LTV. The ultimate relationship was employed on a lateral radiograph of a patient with LSTV for validation.
RESULTS: It is possible to compute the PI-LL mismatch using either UTV or LTV and convert to the corresponding PI-LL when using the other vertebra simply by measuring one additional angle (PI-LL)L = (PI-LL)U + X. This angle X is defined by segments connecting the center of the femoral head to the midpoints of the superior endplates of the UTV and LTV. Using the LTV yields a larger PI-LL mismatch value.
CONCLUSION: In patients with LSTV, it is controversial whether the UTV or LTV should be used as the sacral endplate for sagittal measurements. With this mathematical relationship, rather than completing two sets of measurements, the surgeon would only need to measure one set and the additional angle X to determine the resultant PI-LL mismatch for the other transitional vertebra.
© 2021. Scoliosis Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbarized S1; Lumbosacral transitional segmentation; Lumbosacral transitional vertebra; Sacral dysmorphism; Sacralized L5

Year:  2021        PMID: 33725328     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-021-00307-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  6 in total

1.  Interpretation of Spinal Radiographic Parameters in Patients With Transitional Lumbosacral Vertebrae.

Authors:  Peter L Zhou; John Y Moon; Jared C Tishelman; Thomas J Errico; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Peter G Passias; Aaron J Buckland
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2018 Sep - Oct

2.  The transitional vertebra and sacroiliac joint dysfunction association.

Authors:  Ozge Gulsum Illeez; Arzu Atıcı; Esra Bahadır Ulger; Duygu Geler Kulcu; Feyza Unlu Ozkan; Ilknur Aktas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Intervertebral disc degeneration associated with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: a clinical and anatomical study.

Authors:  T Aihara; K Takahashi; A Ogasawara; E Itadera; Y Ono; H Moriya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-05

4.  Skeletal scintigraphy of young patients with low-back pain and a lumbosacral transitional vertebra.

Authors:  Leonard P Connolly; Pierre A d'Hemecourt; Susan A Connolly; Laura A Drubach; Lyle J Micheli; S Ted Treves
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score: Development and Validation of a New Method of Analyzing Spinopelvic Alignment to Predict Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Caglar Yilgor; Nuray Sogunmez; Louis Boissiere; Yasemin Yavuz; Ibrahim Obeid; Frank Kleinstück; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Emre Acaroglu; Sleiman Haddad; Anne F Mannion; Ferran Pellise; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Sacral Dysmorphism and Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae (LSTV) Review.

Authors:  David M Matson; Lauren M Maccormick; Jonathan N Sembrano; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.