Yanyue Li1,2. 1. The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China. 435186212@qq.com. 2. College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, Sichuan, China. 435186212@qq.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) could regulate the expression of target genes and play important roles in modulation of various metabolic processes. Nevertheless, little is known about the backfat microRNAome (miRNAome) of the Neijiang pig. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to analyse miRNAomes of Landrace and Neijiang pig backfat (LPB and NPB resp.). Furthermore, investigating differentially expressed miRNAs participating in lipid metabolism and mining potential biomarker for Neijiang pig breeding. METHODS: Here we used the Landrace pig with different metabolic characteristics as a control to analyse the Neijiang pig-specific backfat miRNAome. A comprehensive analysis of miRNAomes was performed by deep sequencing. RESULTS: Small RNA sequencing identified 326 unique miRNAs, 280 were co-expressed in both libraries. Only 11 and 35 miRNAs were specifically expressed in LPB and NPB respectively. Sixty seven differentially expressed miRNAs were identified by IDEG6. MiR-1-3p were identified that may participate in lipid metabolism. Furthermore, qPCR results revealed that lower expression of miR-1-3p in NPB could increase the expression of LXRα, which is an enzyme important for the synthesis and accumulation of lipid. The double luciferase report experiment suggested that LXRα was the direct target gene of miR-1-3p. In short, miR-1-3p could modulate the synthesis and accumulation of lipid by target LXRα. It may be a potential marker for pig breeding. CONCLUSION: Our investigation has delineated the different miRNAs expression patterns of LPB and NPB, which may help understand the regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs in the lipid metabolism, and provide potential biomarkers for Neijiang pig breeding.
BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) could regulate the expression of target genes and play important roles in modulation of various metabolic processes. Nevertheless, little is known about the backfat microRNAome (miRNAome) of the Neijiang pig. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to analyse miRNAomes of Landrace and Neijiang pig backfat (LPB and NPB resp.). Furthermore, investigating differentially expressed miRNAs participating in lipid metabolism and mining potential biomarker for Neijiang pig breeding. METHODS: Here we used the Landrace pig with different metabolic characteristics as a control to analyse the Neijiang pig-specific backfat miRNAome. A comprehensive analysis of miRNAomes was performed by deep sequencing. RESULTS: Small RNA sequencing identified 326 unique miRNAs, 280 were co-expressed in both libraries. Only 11 and 35 miRNAs were specifically expressed in LPB and NPB respectively. Sixty seven differentially expressed miRNAs were identified by IDEG6. MiR-1-3p were identified that may participate in lipid metabolism. Furthermore, qPCR results revealed that lower expression of miR-1-3p in NPB could increase the expression of LXRα, which is an enzyme important for the synthesis and accumulation of lipid. The double luciferase report experiment suggested that LXRα was the direct target gene of miR-1-3p. In short, miR-1-3p could modulate the synthesis and accumulation of lipid by target LXRα. It may be a potential marker for pig breeding. CONCLUSION: Our investigation has delineated the different miRNAs expression patterns of LPB and NPB, which may help understand the regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs in the lipid metabolism, and provide potential biomarkers for Neijiang pig breeding.
Authors: Isabelle Gerin; Guido T Bommer; Colin S McCoin; Kyle M Sousa; Venkatesh Krishnan; Ormond A MacDougald Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Alberto Dávalos; Leigh Goedeke; Peter Smibert; Cristina M Ramírez; Nikhil P Warrier; Ursula Andreo; Daniel Cirera-Salinas; Katey Rayner; Uthra Suresh; José Carlos Pastor-Pareja; Enric Esplugues; Edward A Fisher; Luiz O F Penalva; Kathryn J Moore; Yajaira Suárez; Eric C Lai; Carlos Fernández-Hernando Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christine Esau; Scott Davis; Susan F Murray; Xing Xian Yu; Sanjay K Pandey; Michael Pear; Lynnetta Watts; Sheri L Booten; Mark Graham; Robert McKay; Amuthakannan Subramaniam; Stephanie Propp; Bridget A Lollo; Susan Freier; C Frank Bennett; Sanjay Bhanot; Brett P Monia Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Florian Kuchenbauer; Ryan D Morin; Bob Argiropoulos; Oleh I Petriv; Malachi Griffith; Michael Heuser; Eric Yung; Jessica Piper; Allen Delaney; Anna-Liisa Prabhu; Yongjun Zhao; Helen McDonald; Thomas Zeng; Martin Hirst; Carl L Hansen; Marco A Marra; R Keith Humphries Journal: Genome Res Date: 2008-10-10 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Evgeny A Glazov; Pauline A Cottee; Wesley C Barris; Robert J Moore; Brian P Dalrymple; Mark L Tizard Journal: Genome Res Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Dionysios V Chartoumpekis; Apostolos Zaravinos; Panos G Ziros; Ralitsa P Iskrenova; Agathoklis I Psyrogiannis; Venetsana E Kyriazopoulou; Ioannis G Habeos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 3.240