Literature DB >> 33725120

What is the incidence of methotrexate or leflunomide discontinuation related to cytopenia, liver enzyme elevation or kidney function decline?

Georgina Nakafero1, Matthew J Grainge2, Tim Card2,3, Christian D Mallen4, Weiya Zhang1, Michael Doherty1, Maarten W Taal5, Guruprasad P Aithal3,6, Abhishek Abhishek1,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine incidence of treatment changes due to abnormal blood-test results and, to explore rates of treatment changes due to liver, kidney and haematological blood-test abnormalities in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD) treated with low-dose MTX or LEF.
METHODS: Data for people with AIRDs prescribed MTX or LEF were extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants were followed-up from first prescription of MTX or LEF in primary care. Primary outcome of interest was drug discontinuation, defined as a prescription gap of ≥90 days following an abnormal (or severely abnormal) blood-test result. Dose reduction was examined between consecutive prescriptions. Incidence rates per 1000 person-years were calculated.
RESULTS: 15, 670 and 2,689 participants contributing 46, 571 and 4,558 person-years follow-up were included in MTX and LEF cohorts, respectively. The incidence of MTX and LEF discontinuation with abnormal (severely abnormal) blood-test was 42.24 (6.16) and 106.53 (9.42)/1000 person-years in year 1, and 22.44 (2.84) and 31.69 (4.40)/1000 person years, respectively, thereafter. The cumulative incidence of MTX and LEF discontinuation with abnormal (severely abnormal) blood tests was 1 in 24 (1 in 169), 1 in 9 (1 in 106) at 1 year; and 1 in 45 (1 in 352), 1 in 32 (1 in 227) per-year, respectively, thereafter. Raised liver enzymes were the commonest abnormality associated with drug discontinuation. MTX and LEF dose reduction incidence were comparable in year 1, however, thereafter MTX dose was reduced more often than LEF [16.60 (95% CI 13.05, 21.13) vs 8.10 (95% CI 4.97, 13.20)/1000 person-years].
CONCLUSION: MTX and LEF were discontinued for blood-test abnormalities after year 1 of treatment, however, discontinuations for severely abnormal results were uncommon.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autoimmune rheumatic diseases; blood-test monitoring; leflunomide; methotrexate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33725120      PMCID: PMC8645271          DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


Treatment discontinuation and dose reductions were more common in the first year of treatment and occurred at a stable but lower rate thereafter. Severely abnormal blood-test results were uncommonly associated with methotrexate and leflunomide discontinuations. Elevated liver enzymes were the commonest reason for discontinuing methotrexate and leflunomide.

Introduction

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) affect >1% adults and are treated with DMARDs [1-5]. These drugs can cause cytopenia, raised liver enzymes and AKI and, fortnightly to monthly monitoring blood-tests are recommended when initiating treatment with less frequent testing thereafter [6]. In the UK, DMARDs are initiated in a rheumatology clinic with prescriptions dispensed from the hospital and fortnightly blood monitoring overseen by the rheumatology team. Once an effective, tolerated and stable dose is reached, the responsibility for prescribing and arranging 2–3 monthly blood-tests is handed to the GP under shared-care policy supported by the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) and Royal College of General Practitioners [6]. The Rheumatology team is contacted if there are side-effects, including blood-test abnormalities and oversee treatment changes. Monitoring blood-tests are discontinued after 2 years for SSZ while long-term testing is continued for low-dose MTX and LEF [6, 7]. Whether such long-term testing influences the decision to discontinue treatment is not known because most clinical trials are shorter than 1 year, and many observational studies report cumulative toxicity including outcomes from the treatment initiation phase during which reversible drug-induced target organ injury is common [8-10]. However, evidence from a large 2-year clinical trial suggests that DMARD discontinuation due to target organ damage becomes less common with increasing duration of treatment [10]. With growing use of DMARDs and the corresponding increased burden and cost of testing, it is important to evaluate the benefit from regular monitoring blood-tests for long-term low-dose MTX or LEF treatment [11]. Thus, the objectives of this study were to examine the incidence of drug discontinuation and dose reduction with abnormal blood-test results in AIRDs treated with long-term low-dose MTX or LEF. We also explored the data to examine whether the incidence of MTX discontinuation due to any abnormal blood-test result, elevated liver enzymes, AKI or cytopenia differed in RA and PsA as there is evidence that psoriasis increases the risk of hepatotoxicity from MTX [12, 13].

Methods

Data source

Data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Gold was used. Incepted in 1987, CPRD-Gold is a longitudinal anonymized electronic database of health records from over 19 million participants in 927 general practice surgeries across the UK and covers 4.52% of UK residents currently. CPRD participants are representative of the UK population in terms of age, sex and ethnicity [14]. CPRD includes information on demographic details, lifestyle factors (e.g. smoking, alcohol intake), diagnoses, results of investigations including blood tests and physical examination and details of all primary-care prescriptions [14]. Diagnostic and prescription data are recorded as Read codes and product codes, respectively. Blood-test results are stored as numeric values. Additionally, general practitioners (GPs) may record abnormal blood-test results using Read codes.

Approvals

Independent Scientific Advisory Committee of the MHRA (Reference: 19_275R).

Study design

Cohort study: Two separate cohorts were constructed comprising of participants prescribed MTX and LEF, respectively.

Study duration: 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2019

The study began on 1 January 2007 as the BSR guidelines recommending aggressive treatment of RA and shared-care monitoring of DMARDs were published in 2006 [4, 15].

Inclusion criteria

Participants were required to meet the following criteria: diagnosed with either RA, SLE, PsA, ReA, AS, IBD associated arthritis, GCA, PMR or CTDs at age ≥18 years, within the study period; ≥1 GP prescription of MTX (oral or subcutaneous) or LEF after the first record of AIRD diagnosis in CPRD and continuous registration for ≥1 year before the first AIRD diagnosis date in a GP practice contributing research quality data to CPRD. The latter two criteria prevents prevalent AIRD cases on long-term DMARDs that have recently changed GP surgeries from entering the cohort as incident cases.

Exclusion criteria

Chronic liver disease (autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, hepatitis B or C, cirrhosis); haematological malignancies (lymphoma, leukaemia); myelodysplasia; haemolytic anaemia, neutropenia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura or chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage ≥4 prior to cohort entry.

Cohort entry

First shared-care GP prescription of MTX or LEF, respectively.

Cohort exit

The earliest of date of outcome, death, transfer out of the GP practice, last data collection from the GP practice, or 31 December 2019. For the dose reduction analysis, follow-up was censored on the first prescription date at which dose data were missing. Drug discontinuation with abnormal blood-test result: Prescription gap of ≥90 days, with an abnormal blood-test result or Read code indicating abnormal blood-test result within ±60 days of the date of last prescription. The thresholds for abnormal blood-test results were: white blood cells (WBCs) <3.5 × 109/l; neutrophils <1.6 × 109/l; platelets <140 × 109/l; ALT/AST >100 IU/l (6); and kidney function decline defined as either CKD progression based on Read codes entered by the GP using Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD guidelines [16], or a creatinine increase of >26 μmol/l, the threshold for consideration of AKI [17]. Drug discontinuation with severe abnormal blood-test result: Prescription gap of ≥90 days, with severely abnormal monitoring blood-test result within ±60 days of the date of last prescription. Severe blood-test abnormalities were defined as: WBCs <2.5 × 109/l; neutrophils <1.0 × 109/l; platelets <50 × 109/l; ALT or AST >200 IU/l or serum creatinine >2 times the previous value. These thresholds were selected as they reflect grade-3 cytopenia according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, stage 2 acute kidney injury according to the KDIGO guidelines and meet the criteria for drug induced liver injury with ALT or AST >5 times upper limit of normal [17-19]. Dose reduction with abnormal, and severely abnormal blood-test result: Dose reduction between two consecutive prescriptions. Drug discontinuation (any reason): Gap of ≥90 days between the last prescription date and the earliest of date of death, transfer out of the GP practice, last data collection from GP practice or 31 December 2019.

Data management

Read code and product code lists were developed to ascertain AIRDs, inclusion and exclusion criteria, prescriptions and outcomes (available on request).

Outcome validation

A random sample (40%) of MTX discontinuations with a blood-test abnormality was drawn. Data for all consultations within ±60 days of the abnormal blood-test result was extracted. A.A. (Consultant Rheumatologist trained in General Medicine and Rheumatology) screened all Read codes to exclude administrative codes e.g. reminder letter sent, telephone appointment, etc. All clinical experts in the study team [two rheumatologists, one nephrologist, one hepatologist, one gastroenterologist, one haematologist (C.F.) and one academic GP] reviewed the remaining Read codes. Each expert could vote in any condition if they felt that the condition, its treatment or its complications could cause blood, liver or kidney injury. The final list was reviewed by all clinicians and four Read codes were excluded as they were non-specific or could imply DMARD side effects if used alone (Supplementary Table S1, available at Rheumatology online).

Statistical analyses

Mean (s.d.) and n (%) were used for descriptive purposes. The proportion of MTX discontinuations with blood test abnormality that could potentially be explained by an underlying illness was determined. Survival analysis was undertaken to calculate the incidence of outcomes [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] per 1000 person-years for entire follow-up period, first 12 months of follow-up and the subsequent period. Incidence of drug discontinuation or dose reduction with individual blood-test abnormalities were calculated. Missing data on doses were not imputed as they were missing not at random and imputation could create spurious outcomes. Life tables were constructed to estimate the cumulative incidence at 1- and 5-year follow-up. Cumulative hazards were plotted using Nelson-Aalen graphs.

Sensitivity analysis

The incidence of MTX discontinuation for blood-test abnormalities was examined in a sensitivity analysis after excluding cases with SLE and other CTDs as these conditions can cause cytopenia. The incidence of MTX discontinuation with abnormal blood-test results was calculated separately for RA and PsA. Data management and analysis were performed in Stata v16.

Results

Data for 24 871 and 3897 participants with AIRDs prescribed MTX and LEF were ascertained. Of these, 15 670 and 2689 participants contributing 46 571 and 4558 person-years follow-up were included in the MTX and LEF cohorts, respectively (Supplementary Figs S1 and S2). The median (IQR) MTX and LEF dose at cohort entry was 10 (7.5–15) mg/week and 10 (10–20) mg/day, respectively. 2.1% participants were prescribed both drugs at cohort entry or within the first 6 months. The majority of participants in the MTX cohort had RA (65.8%), were female (64.6%) and their mean (s.d.) age was 57 (15) years. In the LEF cohort, 63.9% had RA, 67.3% were female and the mean (s.d.) age was 57 (13) years (Table 1). The median (IQR) follow-up in the MTX and LEF cohorts was 2.31 (0.82–4.92) and 1.03 (0.33–2.94) years, and there were 1262 and 259 drug discontinuations due to abnormal monitoring blood test results, respectively. Of these 95.6 and 95% were ascertained using values of blood-test results while the remainder were ascertained using Read codes. The 40% random sample of MTX discontinuations with blood-test abnormalities consisted of 505 cases and yielded 27 (5.35%) discontinuations that could potentially be explained by another underlying illness or its treatment or complications. The incidence of MTX and LEF discontinuation for any reason, with any blood-test abnormality, and with any severe blood-test abnormality was highest in the first 12-months of shared-care prescribing (Table 2 and Fig. 1). The cumulative annual incidence of discontinuing MTX with abnormal, and severely abnormal blood-test results was 1 in 24 and 1 in 169 at 1 year, and this reduced to 1 in 45 and 1 in 352 per-year, respectively, thereafter. Similarly, for LEF, the cumulative annual incidence of discontinuing treatment with abnormal and severely abnormal blood-test results was 1 in 9 and 1 in 106 at 1 year, reducing to 1 in 32 and 1 in 227 per-year, respectively, thereafter. The proportion discontinuing MTX with abnormal blood test results was lower than that of LEF at 1-year and 5-year follow-up, being 4.2% (95% CI 3.7, 4.4%) for MTX vs 9.3% (8.1, 10.7%) for LEF at 1 year, and 12.2% (11.5, 12.9%) for MTX vs 20.5% (17.8, 23.5%) for LEF at 5-year (Supplementary Fig. S3, available at Rheumatology online). However, the cumulative incidence of MTX and LEF discontinuation with severe blood-test abnormalities were comparable at both time points.

The incidence of MTX and LEF discontinuation

MTX
LEF
OutcomeEvents (n)Person-time (years)Event rate (95% CI) /1000 person-yearsEvents (n)Person-time (years)Event rate (95%CI) /1000 person-time
Any reason
 Ever358446 57176.96 (74.48, 79.52)9464,558207.54 (194.73, 221.20)
 First 12 months218512 327177.25 (169.97, 184.84)7651,593480.10 (447.26, 515.36)
 After 12 months139934 24440.85 (38.81, 43.00)1812,96561.05 (53.01, 70.30)
With any blood-test abnormality
 Ever126245 43527.78 (26.29-29.35)2594,44958.22 (51.55, 65.76)
 First 12 months51712 23942.24 (38.75, 46.05)1681,577106.53 (91.58, 123.92)
 After 12 months74533 19622.44 (20.90, 24.09)912,87231.69 (25.89, 38.79)
With severe blood-test abnormality
 Ever17046 4663.66 (3.15, 4.25)284,5486.16 (4.25, 8.92)
 First 12 months7312 3175.93 (4.71, 7.45)151,5929.42 (5.68, 15.63)
 After 12 months9734 1492.84 (2.32, 3.47)132,9564.40 (2.56, 7.56)

Nelson–Aalen cumulative hazard estimates for MTX and LEF discontinuation due to: any reason (A), any abnormal blood-test results (B), any severely abnormal blood-test results (C).

Nelson–Aalen cumulative hazard estimates for MTX and LEF discontinuation due to: any reason (A), any abnormal blood-test results (B), any severely abnormal blood-test results (C). Baseline characteristics of participants in the MTX (n = 15 670) and LEF (n = 2,689) cohorts −/−: value <5. Alcohol and smoking status were derived from categorical data in CPRD Additional Clinical file. Alcohol consumption was classified as low (1-14 units/week), medium (15-21 units/week) and hazardous (>21 units/week). The incidence of MTX discontinuation with raised liver enzymes, and decline in kidney function was higher in the first 12 months than subsequently, whereas the incidence of MTX discontinuation with cytopenia remained stable throughout (Table 3 and Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S4, available at Rheumatology online). On the contrary, the incidence of LEF discontinuation with cytopenia, elevated liver enzymes, and kidney function decline was higher in the first 12 months (Table 3 and Fig. 2). LEF discontinuation with severe individual blood-test abnormalities was numerically more common in the first 12 months than subsequently (Table 3).

The incidence of MTX and LEF discontinuation due to individual blood-test abnormalities

MTX
LEF
OutcomeEvents (n)Person-time (years)Event rate (95% CI) /1000 person-yearsEvents (n)Person-time (years)Event rate (95%CI) /1000 person-time
Leucopenia (WBC <3.5 × 109/l)
 Ever28646 4256.16 (5.49, 6.92)76453516.76 (13.39, 20.98)
 First 12 months9712 3227.87 (6.45, 9.61)55159034.58 (26.55, 45.04)
 After 12 months18934 1035.54 (4.81, 6.39)2129457.13 (4.66, 10.91)
Severe leucopenia (WBC <2.5×109/l)
 Ever2846 5550.60 (0.42, 0.87)545581.10 (0.45, 2.64)
 First 12 months1112 3270.89 (0.49, 1.61)–/––/–1.88 (0.61, 5.84)
 After 12 months1734 2280.50 (0.31, 0.80)–/––/–0.68 (0.17, 2.70)
Neutropenia (Neutrophil <1.6×109/l)
 Ever21646 4764.65 (4.07, 5.31)77452817.01 (13.60, 21.26))
 First 12 months7012 3245.68 (4.49, 7.18)45158928.31 (21.14, 37.92)
 After 12 months14634 1524.28 (3.63, 5.03)32293910.89 (7.71, 15.37)
Severe neutropenia (Neutrophil <1.0×109/l)
 Ever3146 5520.67 (0.47, 0.95)545571.10 (0.46, 2.64)
 First 12 months812 3260.65 (0.32, 1.30)–/––/–1.88 (0.61, 5.84)
 After 12 months2334 2260.67 (0.45, 1.01)–/––/–0.67 (0.17, 2.70)
Thrombocytopenia (Platelet <140 × 109/l)
 Ever26446 4285.69 (5.04, 6.42)59453713.00 (10.08, 16.78)
 First 12 months6612 3235.36 (4.21, 6.82)32159120.11 (14.22, 28.44)
 After 12 months19834 1055.81 (5.05, 6.67)2729469.17 (6.30, 13.34) 
Severe thrombocytopenia (Platelet <100×109/l)
 Ever1446 5710.30 (0.18 , 0.51)–/––/–0.44 (0.11, 1.75)
 First 12 months612 3270.49 (0.22, 1.08)–/––/–1.26 (0.31, 5.02)
 After 12 months834 2440.23 (0.12, 0.47)029650
ALT or AST >100 IU/l
 Ever51746 20911.19 (10.26, 12.20)80452417.68 (14.20, 22.02)
 First 12 months27212 29222.13 (19.65, 24.92)60158637.84 (29.38, 48.73)
 After 12 months24533 9177.22 (6.38, 8.18)2029386.81 (4.40, 10.54) 
ALT or AST >200 IU/l
 Ever8346 5261.78 (1.44, 2.21)1345492.86 (1.66 , 4.92)
 First 12 months4812 3213.90 (2.94, 5.17)815925.03 (2.51, 10.05)
 After 12 months3534 2051.02 (0.73, 1.42)529571.69 (0.70, 4.06)
CKD progression/creatinine + >26 μmol/l
 Ever31246 0816.77 (6.06, 7.57)51453211.25 (8.55, 14.81)
 First 12 months11812 2849.61 (8.02, 11.51)30159018.87 (13.19, 26.98)
 After 12 months19433 7975.74 (4.99, 6.60)2129427.14 (4.66, 10.93)
Creatinine >2 times previous value
 Ever3246 5340.69 (0.49, 0.97)545581.10 (0.46, 2.64)
 First 12 months612 3250.49 (0.22, 1.08)000
 After 12 months2634 2090.76 (0.52, 1.12)545581.10 (0.46, 2.64)

Nelson–Aalen cumulative hazard estimates for drug discontinuation due to the individual abnormal blood-test results: MTX discontinuation due to mild abnormal blood-test results (A), severely abnormal blood-test results (C); LEF discontinuation due to mild abnormal blood-test results (B), severely abnormal blood-test results (D).

Nelson–Aalen cumulative hazard estimates for drug discontinuation due to the individual abnormal blood-test results: MTX discontinuation due to mild abnormal blood-test results (A), severely abnormal blood-test results (C); LEF discontinuation due to mild abnormal blood-test results (B), severely abnormal blood-test results (D). The incidence of MTX and LEF discontinuation Incidence of MTX and LEF dose reduction WBC: white blood cells On excluding people with SLE or CTDs, the incidence (95% CI) of MTX discontinuation was 27.40 (25.90, 28.98)/1000 person-years for any blood-test abnormality and, 5.88 (5.21, 6.63)/1000 person-years for leucopenia, 4.40 (3.83, 5.05)/1000 person-years for neutropenia and 5.75 (5.09, 6.49)/1000 person-years for thrombocytopenia. This was comparable to that observed in the entire dataset (Table 2). There were no differences when the analyses were stratified for duration of follow-up (data not shown). The incidence of MTX discontinuation due to elevated liver enzymes was higher in psoriatic arthritis than RA. This difference was present both early and late in the treatment course and for any or severely elevated liver enzymes. However, the incidence of MTX discontinuation due to cytopenia or renal function decline was comparable in the two populations (Table S2).

Dose reduction

85.3% and 30% participants in the MTX and LEF cohorts had at least one dose data missing, and their follow-up was censored at this time point. MTX dose was reduced more often with abnormal blood-test results than LEF after the first 12 months (Table 4). However, the cumulative incidence of dose-reduction with any blood test abnormality and with severe blood-test abnormalities were comparable for MTX and LEF at 1 and 5 years. (Supplementary Fig. S3, available at Rheumatology online). On evaluating individual blood-test abnormalities, LEF dose was more likely to be reduced with neutropenia than MTX, and less likely to be reduced with abnormal LFTs (Table 4).

Incidence of MTX and LEF dose reduction

MTX
LEF
OutcomeEvents (n)Person-time (years)Event rate (95% CI) /1000 person-yearsEvents (n)Person-time (years)Event rate (95%CI) /1000 person-time
Any abnormal blood-test result
 Ever142667921.26 (18.04, 25.06)47315114.92 (11.21, 19.85)
 First 12 months77276427.86 (22.29, 34.84)31117626.36 (18.54, 37.48)
 After first 12 months65391516.60 (13.05, 21.13)1619758.10 (4.97, 13.20)
Leucopenia (WBC <3.5×109/l)
 Ever3667855.31 (3.83, 7.36)1931855.97 (3.80, 9.35)
 First 12 months1927796.84 (4.36, 10.72)14118111.85 (7.02, 20.02)
 After first 12 months1740064.24 (2.64, 6.82)520042.50 (1.04, 5.99)
Neutropenia (Neutrophil <1.6×109/l)
 Ever2167983.09 (2.01, 4.74)2331777.24 (4.81, 10.89)
 First 12 months1427795.04 (2.98, 8.51)13118211.00 (6.39, 18.94)
 After first 12 months740194.24 (2.64, 6.82)1019955.04 (2.71, 9.35)
Thrombocytopenia (Platelet <140×109/l)
 Ever2667843.83 (2.61, 5.63)932002.81 (1.46, 5.41)
 First 12 months1127823.95 (2.19, 7.14)811836.77 (3.38, 13.53)
 After first 12 months1540023.75 (2.26, 6.21)–/––/–0.50 (0.07, 3.52)
ALT or AST >100 IU/l
 Ever5667588.29 (6.38, 10.77)931972.82 (1.46, 5.41)
 First 12 months31277611.17 (7.85, 15.88)711845.91 (2.82, 12.40)
 After first 12 months2539826.28 (4.25, 9.28)–/–20131.00 (0.25, 3.97)
CKD progression/creatinine + >26 μmol/l
 Ever3367874.86 (3.46, 6.84)631991.88 (0.84, 4.17)
 First 12 months1927776.84 (4.36, 10.73)–/––/–1.69 (0.42, 6.76)
 After first 12 months1440103.49 (2.07, 5.89)–/––/–1.99 (0.75, 5.28)

WBC: white blood cells

The incidence of MTX and LEF discontinuation due to individual blood-test abnormalities Seven participants prescribed MTX had dose reduction for severely abnormal blood-test results with incidence of 1.03 (0.49, 2.16) per 1000 person-years. Fewer than five participants prescribed LEF had dose reduction for severely abnormal blood-test results during shared care prescribing. Due to office for national statistics and CPRD policy to avoid accidental identification, we are unable to present incidence for outcomes with <5 events.

Discussion

This is the largest study to examine the incidence of treatment changes with abnormal blood-test results during long-term MTX or LEF therapy. In comparison, the largest systematic review (SR) of low-dose MTX included data on liver and bone-marrow toxicity from 3806 and 3463 participants from 29 studies, and the previous largest study of LEF included data for 3325 participants [9, 20]. This study focused on patients successfully initiated on long-term DMARDs as there is lack of data on benefit from monitoring during this period [6]. It reports that treatment changes with abnormal blood-test results are common in the first 12 months after hospital-supervised treatment initiation and stabilization, and becomes less frequent thereafter. Treatment changes with severe blood-test abnormalities were uncommon and became less frequent over time. Our observation that 3.3% participants discontinued low-dose MTX with elevated liver enzymes are comparable to the 3.7% incidence reported in the SR [9], and, are higher than those in the CORRONA registry [12]. In our study, 2.8% participants discontinued MTX with cytopenia. This is lower than the 6.7% cumulative incidence of cytopenia during MTX therapy in the SR [9]. The incidence of MTX discontinuation with leucopenia (0.6% vs 1.2%) and neutropenia (0.5% vs 1.8%) at 1 year was lower than the cumulative incidence reported in a recent SR of clinical trials that included events from the treatment initiation phase [21]. This may be due to the fact that our outcome definition required drug discontinuation with cytopenia, whereas the SRs reported on the incidence of any cytopenia, including those not requiring treatment discontinuation [9, 21]. Solomon et al. [22] reported a lower cumulative incidence of elevated liver enzymes (0.56%) and haematological abnormalities (0.95%) using data from a 3-year trial of low-dose MTX for preventing cardiovascular events in a population without AIRD. The lower incidence may be due to non-prescription of other DMARDs and less NSAID use [22]. As reported previously, raised liver enzymes were the commonest abnormality associated with MTX discontinuation, and the risk reduced after 12 months [9, 10, 22–24]. On the contrary, the incidence of MTX discontinuation with cytopenia was similar throughout the treatment period. Previous 2-year trials of MTX have reported cytopenia only occasionally, and unrelated to treatment duration [10, 23]. The cumulative incidence of LEF discontinuation with elevated liver enzymes (3.0% vs 3.1%), and with either cytopenia or elevated liver enzymes (7.7% vs 7.0%) were comparable to previous reports [12, 20]. As reported previously, there was a higher incidence of LEF discontinuation with blood-test abnormalities in the first 12 months [10]. LEF was more likely to be discontinued with abnormal blood-tests than MTX. These findings are contrary to the results of a trial in which folate supplementation was not mandatory for participants randomized to MTX [10]. However, in another trial where folate supplementation was mandatory for participants randomized to MTX there were more LEF than MTX discontinuations for elevated liver enzymes (7.7% vs 4.4%) [25]. Folic acid supplementation was recommended in the BSR guidelines and became common practice in the early 2000s, and our findings of greater liver toxicity with LEF are expected. MTX and LEF discontinuation with kidney function decline was uncommon, though more frequent in the first 12 months, raising the possibility that these drugs may be nephrotoxic. However, published data suggests that nephrotoxicity is uncommon with these drugs. Only one case of reversible kidney failure due to MTX was reported in a clinical trial, and there is one case report of LEF induced interstitial nephritis but this was associated with chronic over-dosing and with no cases of LEF nephrotoxicity reported in clinical trials [10, 25–28]. The largest clinical trial to examine the side-effects from low-dose MTX albeit in a non-AIRD population reported an average 1.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate, and 15% lower risk of renal adverse events compared with placebo [22]. A previous 2-year clinical trial reported no change in creatinine with LEF, and only a marginal increase in creatinine with MTX [10]. These findings suggest that there is low risk of nephrotoxicity with LEF and low-dose MTX. MTX was twice as likely to be discontinued with elevated liver enzymes in PsA than in RA, as reported previously [12, 13]. However, the rates of MTX discontinuation due to cytopenia and renal function decline were comparable suggesting this risk is target-organ specific. Further research is required to understand the underlying mechanism. However, these findings suggest that PsA patients treated with MTX should be monitored carefully for hepatotoxicity and advised to minimize risk factors for the latter. Most treatment discontinuations in this study were not due to abnormal blood-test results. The cumulative incidence of all-cause MTX and LEF discontinuation at 1- and 5 years in this study were comparable to previous reports [29-31]. Given a wide MTX dosing range, dose reduction was more common for MTX than for LEF. Strengths of this study include large sample size allowing us to provide precise estimates for anticipated low event rates. Additionally, this study used real-world data, thus increasing generalizability. Outcomes were stratified according to their severity and time-course to add granularity to the results and increase clinical utility. Data from the period when MTX or LEF was commenced were excluded by design and the results are applicable to long-term maintenance treatment where the greatest burden of testing lies. Although this may be viewed as a limitation, it does not reduce the validity of our findings. Missing outcome data is a concern with studies using consultation-based databases. However, the cumulative estimates of drug discontinuation reported in this study are consistent with those from previous trials and observational studies. Additionally, our validation exercise revealed that only 5% outcomes were potentially related to another condition, its complication or its treatment. We used a parsimonious list of conditions in this exercise including those for which there was only a remote possibility of abnormal blood-test results. However, this study has several limitations. First, our findings are not applicable to patients at very high risk of drug toxicity and not transferred to shared-care prescribing e.g. CKD-4, pre-existing chronic liver disease. However, it is extremely uncommon to offer MTX or LEF to such patients, and the results of our study will therefore apply to the vast majority of AIRD patients. Secondly, dose data were missing for the majority of MTX and a large proportion of LEF prescriptions. This limits the validity of dose-reduction analysis. Thirdly, CKD progression and a serum creatinine increase of >26 μm/l, the minimum change required to consider the presence of AKI, was used to ascertain drug discontinuation with kidney function decline [17]. The guideline specifies that the increase in creatinine should occur within 48 h. We were unable to meet this part of the definition due to inherent large gaps between blood-tests, potentially resulting in an overestimate of the incidence of AKI. Our results therefore represent a worst-case scenario with respect to impact on kidney function. Some of the abnormal blood-test results could be due to concurrent prescription of other DMARDs e.g. SSZ. This can potentially elevate the outcome event rate. However, this is unlikely to play a large part as our outcome definition required a prescription gap of at-least 90 days and, it can reasonably be expected that in this period most rheumatologists will be able to ascertain the actual drug responsible for the blood-test abnormality. Moreover, some patients prescribed first-line subcutaneous MTX for RA from the hospital clinic, and stepping down to GP prescribed and monitored oral MTX may appear as incident users of MTX. However, this is likely to be uncommon as most patients with RA in the UK are commenced on oral MTX first-line and, if commenced on subcutaneous MTX first-line may have a contraindication to oral therapy. Research suggests that patients prescribed subcutaneous MTX change to the oral route in <3% instances [32]. Additionally, some treatment discontinuations in people with SLE may be due to increased disease activity e.g. cytopenia resulting in treatment escalation. However, a sensitivity analysis excluding cases with SLE or CTD reported similar event rates as the main analysis. Finally, it is difficult to attribute causality for adverse events and some potential adverse events may be unrelated to the treatment. MTX and LEF are uncommonly discontinued for blood-test abnormalities after the first year of shared-care prescription and discontinuations for severely abnormal blood-test results are even less frequent. These data will be useful when counselling patients in routine clinical practice. Elevated liver enzymes were the commonest blood-test abnormality to cause treatment discontinuations. This underlines the need to advise patients treated with DMARDs to minimize other risk-factors for hepatotoxicity. Further research is required to identify risk-factors of target-organ damage, and, to develop a prognostic model for risk-stratified blood-test monitoring. This is being evaluated by our team in another ongoing study that will also assess the acceptability and cost-effectiveness of risk-based monitoring. Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG-1217–20030). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. C.D.M. is funded by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, the NIHR School for Primary Care Research and a NIHR Research Professorship in General Practice (NIHR-RP-2014–04-026) for this research project. The study sponsor did not have any role in the conduct or reporting of this study. A.A. has received departmental research grants from AstraZeneca and Oxford Immunotec, speaker bureau fees from Menarini, scientific meeting support from Pfizer, consulting fees from Inflazome and author royalties from UpToDate and Springer, unrelated to this work. M.D. has received honoraria for attending Ad hoc advisory boards on gout and osteoarthritis for Grunenthal, Mallinckrodt and Pfizer, and author royalties from UpToDate, and was an investigator in an AstraZeneca-funded, investigator-led, non-drug study (the ‘Sons of Gout’ study), unrelated to this work. His Department have received funding from Bristol Myers Squibb for an unrelated atrial fibrillation study. W.Z. has received honoraria from Regeneron and Eli Lilly for advice on treatment of OA. G.P.A. reports consulting fees from Astrazenca, Amryt Pharma, FRACTYL, Median technologies, Bergen Bio ASA; advisory fees from Kandy therapeutics, GSK, Owlstone, Inventiva Pharma; research grant support from Preglem, Pfiezer inc; and meeting support from Roche Diagnostics. Disclosure statement: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Data availability statement

This study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Due to the CPRD data sharing policy, we unable to share this study’s data. However, access to CPRD data can be directly requested from the CPRD.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at Rheumatology online. Click here for additional data file.

Baseline characteristics of participants in the MTX (n = 15 670) and LEF (n = 2,689) cohorts

Characteristics MTXLEF
Age at cohort entry, mean (s.d.)57.2 (14.8)57 (13.4)
Female, n (%)10 115 (64.6)1807 (67.3)
Smoking status, n (%)
 Non-smoker7339 (46.8)1221 (45.5)
 Current smoker3300 (21.1)555 (20.7)
 Ex-smoker4972 (31.7)902 (33.6)
 Missing59 (0.4)8 (0.3)
Alcohol use, n (%)
 Non-user3132 (20)606 (22.6)
 Low8714 (55.6)1452 (54.1)
 Medium573 (3.7)80 (3.0)
 Hazardous875 (5.6)140 (5.2)
 EX-user563 (3.6)149 (5.6)
 Missing1813 (11.6)259 (9.6)
AIRD type, n (%)
 RA10 306 (65.8)1715 (63.9)
 Lupus/other CTD468 (3.0)26 (1.0)
 PMR/GCA1597 (10.2)203 (7.6)
 Spondyloarthropathy3299 (21.1)742 (27.6)
Other DMARDs, n (%)
 LEF331 (2.1)−/−
 MTX−/−57 (2.1)
 SSZ2660 (17.0)395 (14.7)

−/−: value <5. Alcohol and smoking status were derived from categorical data in CPRD Additional Clinical file. Alcohol consumption was classified as low (1-14 units/week), medium (15-21 units/week) and hazardous (>21 units/week).

  31 in total

1.  BSR/BHPR guideline for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in consultation with the British Association of Dermatologists.

Authors:  K Chakravarty; H McDonald; T Pullar; A Taggart; R Chalmers; S Oliver; J Mooney; M Somerville; A Bosworth; T Kennedy
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Standardization of nomenclature and causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury: summary of a clinical research workshop.

Authors:  Robert J Fontana; Leonard B Seeff; Raúl J Andrade; Einar Björnsson; Christopher P Day; Jose Serrano; Jay H Hoofnagle
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 3.  Adherence and Persistence with Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Vivian P Bykerk; Maher Aassi; Michael Schiff
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Methotrexate and hepatic toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Lindsey Tilling; Sue Townsend; Joel David
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Adverse Effects of Low-Dose Methotrexate: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Robert J Glynn; Elizabeth W Karlson; Fengxin Lu; Cassandra Corrigan; Josh Colls; Chang Xu; Jean MacFadyen; Medha Barbhaiya; Nancy Berliner; Paul F Dellaripa; Brendan M Everett; Aruna D Pradhan; Sarah P Hammond; Meredith Murray; Deepak A Rao; Susan Y Ritter; Anna Rutherford; Jeffrey A Sparks; Jackie Stratton; Dong H Suh; Sara K Tedeschi; Kathleen M M Vanni; Nina P Paynter; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Methotrexate monotherapy and methotrexate combination therapy with traditional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Glen S Hazlewood; Cheryl Barnabe; George Tomlinson; Deborah Marshall; Daniel J A Devoe; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-29

7.  Risk of alanine transferase (ALT) elevation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate in a DAS-steered strategy.

Authors:  L Dirven; N B Klarenbeek; M van den Broek; J H L M van Groenendael; P B J de Sonnaville; P J S M Kerstens; T W J Huizinga; B A C Dijkmans; W F Lems; C F Allaart
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Paul E Stevens; Adeera Levin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. European Leflunomide Study Group.

Authors:  J S Smolen; J R Kalden; D L Scott; B Rozman; T K Kvien; A Larsen; I Loew-Friedrich; C Oed; R Rosenburg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-01-23       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Incidence, prevalence and mortality of patients with psoriasis: a U.K. population-based cohort study.

Authors:  D A Springate; R Parisi; E Kontopantelis; D Reeves; C E M Griffiths; D M Ashcroft
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 9.302

View more
  6 in total

1.  High Efficacy Combined Microneedles Array with Methotrexate Nanocrystals for Effective Anti-Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Fang Wei; Qiuyue Wang; Hang Liu; Xuejing Yang; Wenyu Cao; Weiman Zhao; Yingying Li; Lijie Zheng; Tao Ma; Qingqing Wang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Incidence and pattern of mycophenolate discontinuation associated with abnormal monitoring blood-test results: cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum.

Authors:  Georgina Nakafero; Matthew J Grainge; Tim Card; Christian D Mallen; Richard Riley; Danielle van der Windt; Christopher P Fox; Maarten W Taal; Guruprasad P Aithal; Hywel C Williams; Abhishek Abhishek
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  The Anti-Rheumatic Drug, Leflunomide, Induces Nephrotoxicity in Mice via Upregulation of TGFβ-Mediated p53/Smad2/3 Signaling.

Authors:  Alhanouf A Aljohani; Yasmeen S Alqarni; Maram N Alrashidi; Maha H Aljuhani; Shaimaa A Shehata; Mohamed K El-Kherbetawy; Kousalya Prabahar; Reem Alshaman; Abdullah Alattar; Ahmed M N Helaly; Hayam Ateyya; Ezzat A Ismail; Sawsan A Zaitone
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Development and validation of a prognostic model for leflunomide discontinuation with abnormal blood tests during long-term treatment: cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Gold and Aurum.

Authors:  Georgina Nakafero; Matthew J Grainge; Tim Card; Maarten W Taal; Guruprasad P Aithal; Weiya Zhang; Michael Doherty; Christopher P Fox; Christian D Mallen; Abhishek Abhishek
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 7.046

5.  Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees.

Authors:  James J Tsakas; David F L Liew; Cameron L Adams; Catherine L Hill; Susanna Proudman; Samuel Whittle; Rachelle Buchbinder; Philip C Robinson
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2022-10-17

6.  Liver blood marker testing in UK primary care: a UK wide cohort study, 2004-2016.

Authors:  Polly Scutt; Lu Ban; Tim Card; Colin John Crooks; Neil Guha; Joe West; Joanne R Morling
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.006

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.