Literature DB >> 33723890

Preliminary demonstration of in vivo quasi-steady-state CEST postprocessing-Correction of saturation time and relaxation delay for robust quantification of tumor MT and APT effects.

Xiao-Yong Zhang1, Yuting Zhai1, Ziyi Jin2,3, Cong Li2,3, Phillip Zhe Sun4,5, Yin Wu6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is versatile for measuring the dilute labile protons and microenvironment properties. However, the use of insufficiently long RF saturation duration (Ts) and relaxation delay (Td) may underestimate the CEST measurement. This study proposed a quasi-steady-state (QUASS) CEST analysis for robust CEST quantification.
METHODS: The CEST signal evolution was modeled as a function of the longitudinal relaxation rate during Td and spin-lock relaxation rate during Ts, from which the QUASS-CEST effect is derived. Numerical simulation and in vivo rat glioma MRI experiments were conducted at 11.7 T to compare the apparent and QUASS-CEST results obtained under different Ts/Td of 2 seconds/2 seconds and 4 seconds/4 seconds. Magnetization transfer and amide proton transfer effects were resolved using a multipool Lorentzian fitting and evaluated in contralateral normal tissue and tumor regions.
RESULTS: The simulation showed the dependence of the apparent CEST effect on Ts and Td, and such reliance was mitigated with the QUASS algorithm. Animal experiment results showed that the apparent magnetization transfer and amide proton transfer effects and their contrast between contralateral normal tissue and tumor regions increased substantially with Ts and Td. In comparison, the QUASS magnetization transfer and amide proton transfer effects and their difference between contralateral normal tissue and tumor exhibited little dependence on Ts and Td. In addition, the apparent magnetization transfer and amide proton transfer were significantly smaller than the corresponding QUASS indices (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: The QUASS-CEST algorithm enables robust CEST quantification and offers a straightforward approach to standardize CEST experiments.
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amide proton transfer; chemical exchange saturation transfer; glioma; magnetization transfer; quasi-steady-state CEST

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33723890     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  6 in total

1.  Consistent depiction of the acidic ischemic lesion with APT MRI-Dual RF power evaluation of pH-sensitive image in acute stroke.

Authors:  Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Quasi-steady-state amide proton transfer (QUASS APT) MRI enhances pH-weighted imaging of acute stroke.

Authors:  Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.737

3.  Differentiation of Meningiomas and Gliomas by Amide Proton Transfer Imaging: A Preliminary Study of Brain Tumour Infiltration.

Authors:  Han-Wen Zhang; Xiao-Lei Liu; Hong-Bo Zhang; Ying-Qi Li; Yu-Li Wang; Yu-Ning Feng; Kan Deng; Yi Lei; Biao Huang; Fan Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Quasi-steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer (QUASS CEST) MRI analysis enables T1 normalized CEST quantification - Insight into T1 contribution to CEST measurement.

Authors:  Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.734

Review 5.  Molecular Imaging of Brain Tumors and Drug Delivery Using CEST MRI: Promises and Challenges.

Authors:  Jianpan Huang; Zilin Chen; Se-Weon Park; Joseph H C Lai; Kannie W Y Chan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 6.  Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors.

Authors:  Jinyuan Zhou; Moritz Zaiss; Linda Knutsson; Phillip Zhe Sun; Sung Soo Ahn; Silvio Aime; Peter Bachert; Jaishri O Blakeley; Kejia Cai; Michael A Chappell; Min Chen; Daniel F Gochberg; Steffen Goerke; Hye-Young Heo; Shanshan Jiang; Tao Jin; Seong-Gi Kim; John Laterra; Daniel Paech; Mark D Pagel; Ji Eun Park; Ravinder Reddy; Akihiko Sakata; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; A Dean Sherry; Seth A Smith; Greg J Stanisz; Pia C Sundgren; Osamu Togao; Moriel Vandsburger; Zhibo Wen; Yin Wu; Yi Zhang; Wenzhen Zhu; Zhongliang Zu; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.737

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.