| Literature DB >> 33723630 |
Zerbu Yasar1, Bradley T Elliott2, Yvoni Kyriakidou3, Chiazor T Nwokoma3, Ruth D Postlethwaite1,4, Christopher J Gaffney5, Susan Dewhurst6, Lawrence D Hayes1,7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the effect of age on circulating pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors. A secondary aim was to investigate whether a novel sprint interval training (SIT) intervention (3 × 20 s 'all out' static sprints, twice a week for 8 weeks) would affect inflammatory markers in older men.Entities:
Keywords: Ageing; Cytokines; Exercise; Growth factors; HIIT; Inflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33723630 PMCID: PMC8192388 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-021-04635-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol ISSN: 1439-6319 Impact factor: 3.078
Participant anthropometric and performance parameters at baseline (young and older pre-training) and following sprint interval training (SIT; older post-training)
| Young ( | Older | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-SIT ( | Post-SIT ( | ||
| Age (years) | 28 (5) | 68 (3)a | – |
| BMI (kg m−2) | 23 (2) | 23 (3) | 24 (3)b |
| VO2peak (mL kg min−1) | 55 (11) | 39 (6)a | 41 (8) |
| PPO (W) | 1149 (131) | 696 (89)a | 727 (76) |
| Resting heart rate (b·min−1) | 53 (10) | 56 (7) | 55 (7) |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 127 (10) | 129 (16) | 126 (14) |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 77 (8) | 77 (10) | 77 (10) |
Values given as mean (SD)
SIT sprint interval training, BMI body mass index, VO peak oxygen uptake, PPO peak power output
aYoung different to older at the p < 0.05 level
bOlder pre-SIT different to older post-SIT at the p < 0.05 level
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the methodological flow. PPO peak power output, VO peak oxygen uptake
Fig. 2Schematic representation of the sprint interval session. Participants performed this session twice weekly for eight weeks
Cytokine marker state at baseline for young (n = 11) and older (n = 9)
| Cytokine | Young | Older | Lower limit of detection (pg mL−1) | Accepted (y/n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGF | 11 | 9 | 2.9 | Yes | 1.000 |
| IL-1a | 4 | 5 | 0.8 | No | 0.653 |
| IL-1b | 3 | 4 | 1.6 | No | 0.642 |
| IL-2 | 3 | 0 | 4.8 | No | 0.218 |
| IL-4 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 | No | 1.000 |
| IL-6 | 4 | 6 | 1.2 | No | 0.370 |
| IL-8 | 10 | 7 | 4.9 | Yes | 0.569 |
| IL-10 | 2 | 0 | 1.8 | No | 0.479 |
| IFN-γ | 0 | 0 | 3.5 | No | 1.000 |
| MCP-1 | 11 | 9 | 13.2 | Yes | 1.000 |
| TNFα | 0 | 0 | 4.4 | No | 1.000 |
| VEGF | 10 | 9 | 14.6 | Yes | 1.000 |
Markers were accepted if > 75% of samples returned concentrations > lower limit of detection. p values represent Fisher's exact test for whether the proportion of cytokine detected was different between the young and older group
Fig. 3Cytokine concentrations of young, older pre- and older post-sprint interval training. a EGF, b IL-8, c VEGF and d MCP-1. Young shown in black circles, older shown in grey. Red horizontal lines indicate group means
Fig. 4Correlations between physiological and cytokine markers. a Correlation matrix where values indicate r correlation coefficient and filled squares indicate where p < 0.05. Shading indicates strength of relationship (blue = positive, red = negative correlation). b EGF (pg mL−1) as a function of PPO (W), c EGF (pg mL−1) as a function of VO2peak (mL kg min−1). For both (b) and (c), linear correlation indicated by red line, 95% confidence indicated by red dashed lines. Grey circles indicate older, black indicates younger