Literature DB >> 33723361

Type 2 diabetes is more predictable in women than men by multiple anthropometric and biochemical measures.

Tangying Li1, Huibiao Quan2, Huachuan Zhang3, Leweihua Lin4, Lu Lin4, Qianying Ou4, Kaining Chen4.   

Abstract

Men and women are sexually dimorphic but whether common anthropometric and biochemical parameters predict type 2 diabetes (T2D) in different ways has not been well studied. Here we recruit 1579 participants in Hainan Province, China, and group them by sex. We compared the prediction power of common parameters of T2D in two sexes by association, regression, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. HbA1c is associated with FPG stronger in women than in men and the regression coefficient is higher, consistent with higher prediction power for T2D. Age, waist circumference, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, triglyceride levels, total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, fasting insulin, and proinsulin levels all predict T2D better in women. Except for diastolic blood pressure, all parameters associate or tend to associate with FPG stronger in women than in men. Except for diastolic blood pressure and fasting proinsulin, all parameters associate or tend to associate with HbA1c stronger in women than in men. Except for fasting proinsulin and HDL, the regression coefficients of all parameters with FPG and HbA1c were higher in women than in men. Together, by the above anthropometric and biochemical measures, T2D is more readily predicted in women than men, suggesting the importance of sex-based subgroup analysis in T2D research.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33723361     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85581-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  36 in total

1.  Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China.

Authors:  Wenying Yang; Juming Lu; Jianping Weng; Weiping Jia; Linong Ji; Jianzhong Xiao; Zhongyan Shan; Jie Liu; Haoming Tian; Qiuhe Ji; Dalong Zhu; Jiapu Ge; Lixiang Lin; Li Chen; Xiaohui Guo; Zhigang Zhao; Qiang Li; Zhiguang Zhou; Guangliang Shan; Jiang He
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Role of beta-cell dysfunction, ectopic fat accumulation and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Amalia Gastaldelli
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  Higher Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes in Men Than in Women Is Associated With Differences in Visceral Fat Mass.

Authors:  Anna Nordström; Jenny Hadrévi; Tommy Olsson; Paul W Franks; Peter Nordström
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  Insulin action and resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Michael P Czech
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Gender differences and time trends in incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Sweden--a model explaining the diabetes epidemic worldwide today?

Authors:  Per E Wändell; Axel C Carlsson
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 5.602

6.  The prevalence of Type 2 diabetes and related complications in a nationally representative sample of adults aged 50 and over in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  M L Tracey; S M McHugh; C M Buckley; R J Canavan; A P Fitzgerald; P M Kearney
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 7.  Diabetes: a 21st century challenge.

Authors:  Paul Z Zimmet; Dianna J Magliano; William H Herman; Jonathan E Shaw
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 32.069

8.  The pros and cons of diagnosing diabetes with A1C.

Authors:  Enzo Bonora; Jaakko Tuomilehto
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Sex and Gender Differences in Risk, Pathophysiology and Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Jürgen Harreiter; Giovanni Pacini
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 10.  Sex Differences in the Burden and Complications of Diabetes.

Authors:  Sanne A E Peters; Mark Woodward
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.810

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Circulating miRNA as potential biomarkers for diabetes mellitus type 2: should we focus on searching for sex differences?

Authors:  Weronika Kraczkowska; Lucyna Stachowiak; Andrzej Pławski; Paweł Piotr Jagodziński
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.