| Literature DB >> 33723203 |
Jing Zhang1,2, Mengyi Yang1, Pengfei Luan1, Wei Jia1, Qiujun Liu1, Zhanbing Ma1, Jie Dang1, Hong Lu1, Qian Ma1, Yanfeng Wang1, Chunlan Mu1, Zhenghao Huo1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes are necessary for the production or metabolism of fetal sex hormones during pregnancy. The second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D: 4D) is formed in the early stage of human fetal development and considered an indicator reflecting prenatal sex steroids levels. We explored the association between 2D: 4D and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP. MATERIAL AND METHODS Correlation analysis between 2D: 4D and 8 SNPs, rs2687133 (CPY3A7), rs7173655 (CYP11A1), rs1004467, rs17115149, and rs2486758 (CYP17A1), and rs4646, rs2255192, rs4275794 (CYP19A1), was performed using data from 426 female and 412 male Chinese university students. SNP genotyping was conducted using PCR. Digit lengths were photographed and measured by image processing software. RESULTS rs2486758 (CYP17A1) correlated with left hand 2D: 4D in men (P=0.026), and rs1004467 (CYP17A1) correlated with right hand 2D: 4D in men (P=0.008) and the whole population (P=0.032). In men, allele G rs1004467 decreased right hand 2D: 4D, while allele C of rs2486758 increased left hand 2D: 4D. In women, left hand 2D: 4D was higher in genotypes with allele A of SNP rs4646 (CYP19A1) under the dominant genetic model; female DR-L was higher in genotypes with allele T of rs17115149 (CYP11A1). SNPs rs2687133 (CYP3A7) and rs1004467 (CYP17A1) were significantly correlated with right hand 2D: 4D (P=0.0107). CONCLUSIONS SNPs rs1004467 and rs2486758 of CYP17A1 are significant in the relationship between 2D: 4D and CYP gene polymorphisms under different conditions. SNP interactions between CYP genes probably impact 2D: 4D. The correlation between 2D: 4D and some sex hormone-related diseases may be due to the effect of CYP variants on the 2 phenotypes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33723203 PMCID: PMC7980499 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.930591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Specific information on candidate SNPs of CYP genes.
| Gene | SNP | Chromosome | Position | Location | Allele | MAF | HWpval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2687133 | 7 | 99170019 | Intron | C>T | 0.254 | 0.9280 | |
| rs7173655 | 15 | 72419415 | Intron | C>T | 0.350 | 0.4637 | |
| rs17115149 | 10 | 104587708 | 5′-UTR | C>T | 0.189 | 0.1475 | |
| rs1004467 | 10 | 104584497 | Intron | A>G | 0.329 | 0.9660 | |
| rs2486758 | 10 | 104587470 | 5′-UTR | T>C | 0.190 | 0.1097 | |
| rs4646 | 15 | 49290136 | 3′-UTR | C>A | 0.297 | 0.6116 | |
| rs2255192 | 15 | 49288127 | 3′-UTR | C>T | 0.188 | 0.1793 | |
| rs4275794 | 15 | 49288409 | 3′-UTR | T>C | 0.189 | 0.1940 |
SNPs – single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
Figure 1Linkage disequilibrium (LD) map of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes CYP17A1 and CYP19A1. A good LD was found among rs1004467, rs2486758, and rs17115149 of CYP17A1(rs1004467 – rs2486758: D’=0.9993, r2=0.1153; rs1004467 – rs17115149: D’=0.6885, r2=0.0202; rs2486758 – rs17115149: D’=0.9964, r2=0.0203); and rs2255192, rs4275794, and rs4646 of CYP19A1(rs2255192 – rs4275794: D’=0.9883, r2=0.9728; rs2255192 – rs4646: D’=0.9992, r2=0.0974; rs4275794 – rs4646: D’=0.9992, r2=0.0978). The haplotypes in the blocks were established based on the LD values.
The summary of 2D: 4D results for men and women.
| L2D: 4D | R2D: 4D | DR-L | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Mean±SD | Range | Mean±SD | Range | Mean±SD | |
| Total | 0.8271–1.0788 | 0.964±0.033 | 0.8551–1.0598 | 0.961±0.033 | −0.1185-0.0833 | −0.002±0.028 |
| Male | 0.8271–1.0595 | 0.960±0.036 | 0.8551–1.0524 | 0.959±0.033 | −0.1061-0.0833 | −0.002±0.027 |
| Female | 0.8726–1.0788 | 0.967±0.032 | 0.8811–1.0598 | 0.964±0.034 | −0.1185-0.0675 | −0.003±0.028 |
| t | −2.951 | −2.353 | 0.687 | |||
| p | 0.003 | 0.019 | 0.492 | |||
P<0.05;
P<0.01.
2D: 4D – second-to-fourth digit ratio.
The difference of the digit ratios among SNP genotypes of CYP genes.
| Genotype | L2D: 4D | R2D: 4D | DR-L | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | F | Mean±SD | F | Mean±SD | F | ||||
| CC | 0.9676±0.0344 | 0.925 | 0.397 | 0.9634±0.0360 | 0.282 | 0.754 | −0.0043±0.0275 | 2.138 | 0.119 |
| TT | 0.9626±0.0331 | 0.9620±0.0337 | −0.0005±0.0271 | ||||||
| TC | 0.9652±0.0327 | 0.9605±0.0323 | −0.0047±0.0282 | ||||||
| CC | 0.9645±0.0336 | 0.187 | 0.830 | 0.9629±0.0351 | 0.739 | 0.478 | −0.0016±0.0273 | 0.301 | 0.740 |
| TT | 0.9645±0.0346 | 0.9619±0.0314 | −0.0026±0.0309 | ||||||
| TC | 0.9631±0.0322 | 0.9600±0.0320 | −0.0032±0.0269 | ||||||
| GG | 0.9636±0.0334 | 0.76 | 0.468 | 0.9615±0.0329 | 0.874 | 0.418 | −0.0021±0.0272 | 0.295 | 0.744 |
| TT | 0.9771±0.0367 | 0.9755±0.0480 | −0.0016±0.0508 | ||||||
| TG | 0.9645±0.0306 | 0.9603±0.0344 | −0.0042±0.0275 | ||||||
| AA | 0.9661±0.0336 | 2.097 | 0.123 | 0.9649±0.0331 | 4.113 | 0.017 | −0.0012±0.0279 | 0.625 | 0.535 |
| GG | 0.9587±0.0356 | 0.9553±0.0356 | −0.0034±0.0287 | ||||||
| AG | 0.9630±0.0318 | 0.9596±0.0326 | −0.0034±0.0270 | ||||||
| CC | 0.9705±0.0384 | 1.647 | 0.193 | 0.9629±0.0333 | 1.677 | 0.187 | −0.0076±0.0318 | 0.879 | 0.415 |
| TT | 0.9626±0.0319 | 0.9600±0.0339 | −0.0026±0.0273 | ||||||
| TC | 0.9659±0.0346 | 0.9647±0.0318 | −0.0012±0.0276 | ||||||
| AA | 0.9656±0.0348 | 2.485 | 0.084 | 0.9654±0.0343 | 0.889 | 0.411 | −0.0001±0.0256 | 1.527 | 0.218 |
| CC | 0.9613±0.0327 | 0.9602±0.0328 | −0.0012±0.0269 | ||||||
| AC | 0.9666±0.033 | 0.9622±0.0337 | −0.0043±0.0287 | ||||||
| CC | 0.9637±0.0332 | 0.259 | 0.772 | 0.9605±0.0343 | 0.91 | 0.403 | −0.0032±0.0277 | 1.786 | 0.168 |
| TT | 0.9609±0.0315 | 0.9665±0.0294 | 0.0056±0.0245 | ||||||
| TC | 0.9649±0.0330 | 0.9630±0.0314 | −0.0018±0.0277 | ||||||
| CC | 0.9609±0.0315 | 0.154 | 0.857 | 0.9665±0.0294 | 0.542 | 0.582 | 0.0056±0.0245 | 1.723 | 0.179 |
| TT | 0.9640±0.0331 | 0.9609±0.0341 | −0.0031±0.0278 | ||||||
| TC | 0.9641±0.0332 | 0.9621±0.0320 | −0.0020±0.0274 | ||||||
P<0.05.
SNP – single-nucleotide polymorphism.
Figure 2Second-to-fourth digit ratios (2D: 4D) of different sexes distributed in different genotypes of the CYP17A1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). (A–C) Left hand 2D: 4D of rs17115149, rs1004467, and rs2486758 genotypes; (D–F) Right hand 2D: 4D of rs17115149, rs1004467, and rs2486758 genotypes. The black scatter points are individual 2D: 4D observations (including 400 men and 404 women). The box along with the upper and lower vertical lines represent the quartile range of 2D: 4D. Different colors of boxes represent different phenotypes. The horizontal line inside the box represents the mean value of the 2D: 4D. Remeasurement reliability of all digit lengths among 3 operators were acceptable for both hands in the intra-class correlation coefficient test.
The relationship between CYP SNPs and L2D: 4D, R2D: 4D, and DR-L in men and women.
| Genotype | L2D: 4D | R2D: 4D | DR-L | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BETA | STAT | P-adjusted | BETA | STAT | P-adjusted | BETA | STAT | P-adjusted | |
| Total | 0.0025 | 1.361 | 0.298 | −0.0004 | −0.195 | 0.845 | −0.0029 | −1.869 | 0.372 |
| Male | 0.0049 | 1.773 | 0.288 | 0.0008 | 0.319 | 0.818 | −0.0040 | −1.856 | 0.291 |
| Female | 0.0005 | 0.215 | 0.954 | −0.0013 | −0.503 | 0.820 | −0.0018 | −0.844 | 0.946 |
| Total | −0.0004 | −0.237 | 0.887 | −0.0012 | −0.723 | 0.627 | −0.0008 | −0.589 | 0.613 |
| Male | −0.0020 | −0.808 | 0.566 | −0.0025 | −1.073 | 0.426 | −0.0005 | −0.279 | 0.851 |
| Female | 0.0011 | 0.472 | 0.954 | −1.6×10−5 | −0.006 | 0.995 | −0.0011 | −0.537 | 0.946 |
| Total | 0.0024 | 0.822 | 0.617 | 0.0009 | 0.302 | 0.832 | −0.0015 | −0.620 | 0.613 |
| Male | 0.0046 | 1.119 | 0.566 | 0.0073 | 1.871 | 0.200 | 0.0027 | 0.849 | 0.595 |
| Female | 0.0004 | 0.094 | 0.954 | −0.0062 | −1.439 | 0.603 | −0.0066 | −1.829 | 0.618 |
| Total | −0.0035 | −2.038 | 0.176 | −0.0050 | −2.863 | 0.032 | −0.0014 | −1.005 | 0.613 |
| Male | −0.0055 | −2.082 | 0.228 | −0.0086 | −3.426 | 0.008 | −0.0031 | −1.482 | 0.291 |
| Female | −0.0023 | −1.045 | 0.889 | −0.0023 | −0.9664 | 0.790 | 3.69×10−5 | 0.019 | 0.985 |
| Total | 0.0036 | 1.808 | 0.176 | 0.0032 | 1.59 | 0.337 | −0.0004 | −0.246 | 0.805 |
| Male | 0.0091 | 3.087 | 0.026 | 0.0087 | 3.075 | 0.013 | −0.0004 | −0.174 | 0.862 |
| Female | −0.0017 | −0.645 | 0.954 | −0.0021 | −0.7386 | 0.790 | −0.0004 | −0.159 | 0.985 |
| Total | 0.0034 | 1.921 | 0.176 | 0.0024 | 1.319 | 0.375 | −0.0011 | −0.708 | 0.613 |
| Male | 0.0025 | 0.934 | 0.566 | 0.0019 | 0.7177 | 0.568 | −0.0007 | −0.313 | 0.851 |
| Female | 0.0045 | 1.916 | 0.336 | 0.0030 | 1.215 | 0.675 | −0.0015 | −0.694 | 0.946 |
| Total | 6.1x10-5 | 0.030 | 0.976 | 0.0027 | 1.344 | 0.375 | 0.0027 | 1.588 | 0.400 |
| Male | −0.0003 | −0.109 | 0.913 | 0.0034 | 1.166 | 0.419 | 0.0038 | 1.554 | 0.291 |
| Female | −0.0001 | −0.057 | 0.954 | 0.0017 | 0.599 | 0.820 | 0.0019 | 0.782 | 0.946 |
| Total | −0.0006 | −0.300 | 0.887 | 0.0020 | 0.944 | 0.518 | 0.0025 | 1.502 | 0.400 |
| Male | −0.0007 | −0.223 | 0.899 | 0.0028 | 0.968 | 0.445 | 0.0035 | 1.459 | 0.291 |
| Female | −0.0011 | −0.407 | 0.954 | 0.0007 | 0.243 | 0.881 | 0.0018 | 0.750 | 0.946 |
P value was adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberg method;
P<0.05,
P<0.01.
SNPs – single-nucleotide polymorphisms; L2D: 4D – left hand second-to-fourth digit ratio; R2D: 4D – right hand second-to-fourth digit ratio; DR-L – R2D: 4D minus L2D: 4D.
The association between CYP17A1 SNPs and 2D: 4D under different haplotypes for men and women.
| rs17115149-rs1004467-rs2486758 | L2D: 4D | R2D: 4D | DR-L | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | F | p | Mean±SD | F | p | Mean±SD | F | p | ||
| Total | G-A-T | 0.9639±0.0331 | 1.116 | 0.341 | 0.962±0.0328 | 1.790 | 0.147 | −0.0019±0.0272 | 0.239 | 0.869 |
| G-G-T | 0.9618±0.0338 | 0.9589±0.0331 | −0.0030±0.0275 | |||||||
| G-A-C | 0.9662±0.0370 | 0.9644±0.0320 | −0.0018±0.0292 | |||||||
| T-A-T | 0.9657±0.0305 | 0.9622±0.0355 | −0.0035±0.0290 | |||||||
| Male | G-A-T | 0.9605±0.0343 | 2.135 | 0.094 | 0.9593±0.0321 | 4.382 | 0.005 | −0.0013±0.0277 | 0.389 | 0.761 |
| G-G-T | 0.9577±0.0374 | 0.9544±0.0332 | −0.0034±0.0275 | |||||||
| G-A-C | 0.9666±0.0404 | 0.9659±0.0313 | −0.0006±0.0307 | |||||||
| T-A-T | 0.9662±0.0257 | 0.9657±0.0339 | −0.0004±0.0279 | |||||||
| Female | G-A-T | 0.9673±0.0316 | 0.197 | 0.898 | 0.9648±0.0333 | 0.645 | 0.586 | −0.0025±0.0268 | 0.396 | 0.756 |
| G-G-T | 0.9656±0.0296 | 0.9630±0.0326 | −0.0026±0.0275 | |||||||
| G-A-C | 0.9659±0.0337 | 0.9630±0.0327 | −0.0028±0.0278 | |||||||
| T-A-T | 0.9652±0.0351 | 0.9586±0.0371 | −0.0066±0.0300 | |||||||
P<0.01.
SNPs – single-nucleotide polymorphisms; 2D: 4D – second-to-fourth digit ratio.
Generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis for prediction of R2D: 4D.
| Model | Training Bal.Acc | Testing Bal.Acc | Sign Test(p) | CV consistency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1004467 | 0.5568 | 0.5558 | 8 (0.0547) | 10/10 |
| rs2687133-rs1004467 | 0.5786 | 0.5379 | 9 (0.0107 | 9/10 |
P<0.05.
R2D: 4D – right hand second-to-fourth digit ratio.
Figure 3Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) interaction graphs analyzed by generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction for second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D: 4D). (A, B) Optimal models as determined by generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction (GMDR) for CYP SNPs (0 = 0 minor allele; 1=1 minor allele; 2=2 minor alleles). The numbers within each small square represent positive scores (left) and negative scores (right). For each square, dark blu cells indicate the high effect on the 2D: 4D, and light blue cells represent the low effect on the 2D: 4D. The test was adjusted for sex.