Jeong-Rim Lee1, Bernadin Joseph2, Rylon D Hofacer3, Brian Upton4, Samuel Y Lee5, Loren Ewing5, Bingqing Zhang6, Steve C Danzer5, Andreas W Loepke7. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 3. Idaho Department of Commerce, Boise, ID, USA. 4. Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 6. Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 7. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: pedsanesthesia@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Structural brain abnormalities in newborn animals after prolonged exposure to all routinely used general anaesthetics have raised substantial concerns for similar effects occurring in millions of children undergoing surgeries annually. Combining a general anaesthetic with non-injurious sedatives may provide a safer anaesthetic technique. We tested dexmedetomidine as a mitigating therapy in a sevoflurane dose-sparing approach. METHODS: Neonatal rats were randomised to 6 h of sevoflurane 2.5%, sevoflurane 1% with or without three injections of dexmedetomidine every 2 h (resulting in 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 37.5, or 50 μg kg-1 h-1), or fasting in room air. Heart rate, oxygen saturation, level of hypnosis, and response to pain were measured during exposure. Neuronal cell death was quantified histologically after exposure. RESULTS: Sevoflurane at 2.5% was more injurious than at 1% in the hippocampal cornu ammonis (CA)1 and CA2/3 subfields; ventral posterior and lateral dorsal thalamic nuclei; prefrontal, retrosplenial, and somatosensory cortices; and subiculum. Although sevoflurane 1% did not provide complete anaesthesia, supplementation with dexmedetomidine dose dependently increased depth of anaesthesia and diminished responses to pain. The combination of sevoflurane 1% and dexmedetomidine did not reliably reduce neuronal apoptosis relative to an equianaesthetic dose of sevoflurane 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: A sub-anaesthetic dose of sevoflurane combined with dexmedetomidine achieved a level of anaesthesia comparable with that of sevoflurane 2.5%. Similar levels of anaesthesia caused comparable programmed cell death in several developing brain regions. Depth of anaesthesia may be an important factor when comparing the neurotoxic effects of different anaesthetic regimens.
BACKGROUND:Structural brain abnormalities in newborn animals after prolonged exposure to all routinely used general anaesthetics have raised substantial concerns for similar effects occurring in millions of children undergoing surgeries annually. Combining a general anaesthetic with non-injurious sedatives may provide a safer anaesthetic technique. We tested dexmedetomidine as a mitigating therapy in a sevoflurane dose-sparing approach. METHODS: Neonatal rats were randomised to 6 h of sevoflurane 2.5%, sevoflurane 1% with or without three injections of dexmedetomidine every 2 h (resulting in 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 37.5, or 50 μg kg-1 h-1), or fasting in room air. Heart rate, oxygen saturation, level of hypnosis, and response to pain were measured during exposure. Neuronal cell death was quantified histologically after exposure. RESULTS:Sevoflurane at 2.5% was more injurious than at 1% in the hippocampal cornu ammonis (CA)1 and CA2/3 subfields; ventral posterior and lateral dorsal thalamic nuclei; prefrontal, retrosplenial, and somatosensory cortices; and subiculum. Although sevoflurane 1% did not provide complete anaesthesia, supplementation with dexmedetomidine dose dependently increased depth of anaesthesia and diminished responses to pain. The combination of sevoflurane 1% and dexmedetomidine did not reliably reduce neuronal apoptosis relative to an equianaesthetic dose of sevoflurane 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: A sub-anaesthetic dose of sevoflurane combined with dexmedetomidine achieved a level of anaesthesia comparable with that of sevoflurane 2.5%. Similar levels of anaesthesia caused comparable programmed cell death in several developing brain regions. Depth of anaesthesia may be an important factor when comparing the neurotoxic effects of different anaesthetic regimens.