Megan C Whatnall1,2, Melinda J Hutchesson1,2, Thomas Sharkey1,2, Rebecca L Haslam1,2, Aaron Bezzina1,2, Clare E Collins1,2, Flora Tzelepis3,4,5, Lee M Ashton1,2. 1. School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan2308, Australia. 2. Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan2308, Australia. 3. School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. 4. Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia. 5. Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe strategies used to recruit and retain young adults in nutrition, physical activity and/or obesity intervention studies, and quantify the success and efficiency of these strategies. DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted. The search included six electronic databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCT) published up to 6 December 2019 that evaluated nutrition, physical activity and/or obesity interventions in young adults (17-35 years). Recruitment was considered successful if the pre-determined sample size goal was met. Retention was considered acceptable if ≥80 % retained for ≤6-month follow-up or ≥70 % for >6-month follow-up. RESULTS: From 21 582 manuscripts identified, 107 RCT were included. Universities were the most common recruitment setting used in eighty-four studies (79 %). Less than half (46 %) of the studies provided sufficient information to evaluate whether individual recruitment strategies met sample size goals, with 77 % successfully achieving recruitment targets. Reporting for retention was slightly better with 69 % of studies providing sufficient information to determine whether individual retention strategies achieved adequate retention rates. Of these, 65 % had adequate retention. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights poor reporting of recruitment and retention information across trials. Findings may not be applicable outside a university setting. Guidance on how to improve reporting practices to optimise recruitment and retention strategies within young adults could assist researchers in improving outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To describe strategies used to recruit and retain young adults in nutrition, physical activity and/or obesity intervention studies, and quantify the success and efficiency of these strategies. DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted. The search included six electronic databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCT) published up to 6 December 2019 that evaluated nutrition, physical activity and/or obesity interventions in young adults (17-35 years). Recruitment was considered successful if the pre-determined sample size goal was met. Retention was considered acceptable if ≥80 % retained for ≤6-month follow-up or ≥70 % for >6-month follow-up. RESULTS: From 21 582 manuscripts identified, 107 RCT were included. Universities were the most common recruitment setting used in eighty-four studies (79 %). Less than half (46 %) of the studies provided sufficient information to evaluate whether individual recruitment strategies met sample size goals, with 77 % successfully achieving recruitment targets. Reporting for retention was slightly better with 69 % of studies providing sufficient information to determine whether individual retention strategies achieved adequate retention rates. Of these, 65 % had adequate retention. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights poor reporting of recruitment and retention information across trials. Findings may not be applicable outside a university setting. Guidance on how to improve reporting practices to optimise recruitment and retention strategies within young adults could assist researchers in improving outcomes.
Authors: Nadine Ghammachi; Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani; Seema Mihrshahi; Rimante Ronto Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Megan Whatnall; Erin D Clarke; Marc T P Adam; Lee M Ashton; Tracy Burrows; Melinda Hutchesson; Clare E Collins Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 6.706