Abdulaziz Almuqrin1,2, Andrew D Davidson1, Maia Kavanagh Williamson1, Philip A Lewis1, Kate J Heesom3, Susan Morris4, Sarah C Gilbert4, David A Matthews5. 1. School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, University Walk, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK. 2. Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 3. Proteomics Facility, Faculty of Life Sciences, University Walk, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK. 4. Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK. 5. School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, University Walk, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK. d.a.matthews@bristol.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is a recombinant adenovirus vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 that has passed phase III clinical trials and is now in use across the globe. Although replication-defective in normal cells, 28 kbp of adenovirus genes is delivered to the cell nucleus alongside the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein gene. METHODS: We used direct RNA sequencing to analyse transcript expression from the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 genome in human MRC-5 and A549 cell lines that are non-permissive for vector replication alongside the replication permissive cell line, HEK293. In addition, we used quantitative proteomics to study over time the proteome and phosphoproteome of A549 and MRC5 cells infected with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. RESULTS: The expected SARS-CoV-2 S coding transcript dominated in all cell lines. We also detected rare S transcripts with aberrant splice patterns or polyadenylation site usage. Adenovirus vector transcripts were almost absent in MRC-5 cells, but in A549 cells, there was a broader repertoire of adenoviral gene expression at very low levels. Proteomically, in addition to S glycoprotein, we detected multiple adenovirus proteins in A549 cells compared to just one in MRC5 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine's transcriptomic and proteomic repertoire in cell culture is as expected. The combined transcriptomic and proteomics approaches provide a detailed insight into the behaviour of this important class of vaccine using state-of-the-art techniques and illustrate the potential of this technique to inform future viral vaccine vector design.
BACKGROUND: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is a recombinant adenovirus vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 that has passed phase III clinical trials and is now in use across the globe. Although replication-defective in normal cells, 28 kbp of adenovirus genes is delivered to the cell nucleus alongside the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein gene. METHODS: We used direct RNA sequencing to analyse transcript expression from the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 genome in humanMRC-5 and A549 cell lines that are non-permissive for vector replication alongside the replication permissive cell line, HEK293. In addition, we used quantitative proteomics to study over time the proteome and phosphoproteome of A549 and MRC5 cells infected with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. RESULTS: The expected SARS-CoV-2 S coding transcript dominated in all cell lines. We also detected rare S transcripts with aberrant splice patterns or polyadenylation site usage. Adenovirus vector transcripts were almost absent in MRC-5 cells, but in A549 cells, there was a broader repertoire of adenoviral gene expression at very low levels. Proteomically, in addition to S glycoprotein, we detected multiple adenovirus proteins in A549 cells compared to just one in MRC5 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine's transcriptomic and proteomic repertoire in cell culture is as expected. The combined transcriptomic and proteomics approaches provide a detailed insight into the behaviour of this important class of vaccine using state-of-the-art techniques and illustrate the potential of this technique to inform future viral vaccine vector design.
Authors: Elizabeth G Rhee; Joseph N Blattman; Sudhir P Kasturi; R Phelps Kelley; David R Kaufman; Diana M Lynch; Annalena La Porte; Nathaniel L Simmons; Sarah L Clark; Bali Pulendran; Philip D Greenberg; Dan H Barouch Journal: J Virol Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Charlotte Soneson; Yao Yao; Anna Bratus-Neuenschwander; Andrea Patrignani; Mark D Robinson; Shobbir Hussain Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Adam W Whisnant; Christopher S Jürges; Thomas Hennig; Emanuel Wyler; Bhupesh Prusty; Andrzej J Rutkowski; Anne L'hernault; Lara Djakovic; Margarete Göbel; Kristina Döring; Jennifer Menegatti; Robin Antrobus; Nicholas J Matheson; Florian W H Künzig; Guido Mastrobuoni; Chris Bielow; Stefan Kempa; Chunguang Liang; Thomas Dandekar; Ralf Zimmer; Markus Landthaler; Friedrich Grässer; Paul J Lehner; Caroline C Friedel; Florian Erhard; Lars Dölken Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: M A Morsy; M Gu; S Motzel; J Zhao; J Lin; Q Su; H Allen; L Franlin; R J Parks; F L Graham; S Kochanek; A J Bett; C T Caskey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-07-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Richard D Antrobus; Lynda Coughlan; Tamara K Berthoud; Matthew D Dicks; Adrian Vs Hill; Teresa Lambe; Sarah C Gilbert Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Ali Alqahtani; Kate Heesom; Jonathan L Bramson; David Curiel; Hideyo Ugai; David A Matthews Journal: J Gen Virol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.891
Authors: Denis Y Logunov; Inna V Dolzhikova; Olga V Zubkova; Amir I Tukhvatullin; Dmitry V Shcheblyakov; Alina S Dzharullaeva; Daria M Grousova; Alina S Erokhova; Anna V Kovyrshina; Andrei G Botikov; Fatima M Izhaeva; Olga Popova; Tatiana A Ozharovskaya; Ilias B Esmagambetov; Irina A Favorskaya; Denis I Zrelkin; Daria V Voronina; Dmitry N Shcherbinin; Alexander S Semikhin; Yana V Simakova; Elizaveta A Tokarskaya; Nadezhda L Lubenets; Daria A Egorova; Maksim M Shmarov; Natalia A Nikitenko; Lola F Morozova; Elena A Smolyarchuk; Evgeny V Kryukov; Vladimir F Babira; Sergei V Borisevich; Boris S Naroditsky; Alexander L Gintsburg Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Pedro M Folegatti; Daniel Jenkin; Susan Morris; Sarah Gilbert; Denny Kim; James S Robertson; Emily R Smith; Emalee Martin; Marc Gurwith; Robert T Chen Journal: Vaccine Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Renata Faria de Carvalho; Lucas de Siqueira Penna Quintaes; Thaís de Cássia de Souza Su; Leticia Mitiko Kobayashi; Ana Cristina Martins de Almeida Nogueira Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Maha Othman; Alexander T Baker; Elena Gupalo; Abdelrahman Elsebaie; Carly M Bliss; Matthew T Rondina; David Lillicrap; Alan L Parker Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2021-08-23 Impact factor: 16.036