Literature DB >> 33722262

Research utilisation in clinical practice: the experience of nurses and midwives working in public hospitals.

Asrat Hailu Dagne1, H /Mariam Demewozu Tebeje2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurses and midwives play a vital role to utilise research in clinical decision-making practice. However, limited support for research utilisation and barriers of research utilisation hamper to utilise up-to-date research findings in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aimed to explore nurses' and midwives' experience of research utilisation in public hospitals.
METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was conducted to explore nurses' and midwives' experience of research utilisation in clinical practice within South Gondar Zone public hospitals from January 3 to June 28, 2020. A total of 20 interviewees, 40 participants of FGDs, and 8 observations were considered in the study. Data from the interview, FGD, and observation were imported into NVivo 12 plus to manage and analyze the data using the Computer-Assisted Data Analysis Software Program (CAQDAS). The data were analyzed through thematic content analysis.
RESULTS: Nurses' and midwives' experience of using research findings in clinical decision-making emerged as "the non-intentional research utilisation" the main theme. Data analysis produced as "the belief towards research utilisation", "the limited support for nurses and midwives", and, "the perceived barriers of research utilisation" as the three themes. Participants believed that the non-use of the primary research was recommended due to fear of accountability for client harm. The limited support for nurses' and midwives' experience of research utilisation decrease nurses' and midwives' confidence to utilise research in clinical practice. Knowledge, attitude, time mismanagement, and the lack of motivation were perceived barriers to research utilisation. The lack of training and access to systematic review and meta-analysis research findings limited the research utilisation in clinical practice.
CONCLUSIONS: The experience of research utilisation indicated that there was limited support for nurses and midwives to utilise research. Nurses and midwives did not utilise research in their clinical practice intentionally. This study identified that knowledge, negative attitude towards research utilisation, lack of training; time mismanagement, and lack of motivation were the perceived barriers to research utilisation. Therefore, the promotion of adopting the research utilisation and training on the identified barriers are mandatory. Nurses and midwives play a vital role to utilise research in clinical decision-making practice. However, the limited support for research utilisation and barriers of research utilisation hamper the utilisation of up-to-date research in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aimed to explore nurses' and midwives' experience of using the knowledge obtained from research findings in clinical and healthcare decision-making practice within public hospitals. The experience of research utilisation among nurses and midwives working in public hospitals was studied. There was limited support for nurses' and midwives' experience of research utilisation. Nurses and midwives did not utilise research in their clinical practice intentionally. The knowledge, negative attitude towards research utilisation, lack of training, time mismanagement, and lack of motivation were the perceived barriers to research utilisation. Therefore, the promotion of adopting the research utilisation and training on the identified barriers are mandatory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers; Research utilisation; Supporting factors of research utilisation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33722262      PMCID: PMC7962333          DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01095-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


  31 in total

1.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  An exploration of the roles of nurse managers in evidence-based practice implementation.

Authors:  Joyce E Wilkinson; Sandra M Nutley; Huw T O Davies
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Complex interventions and nursing: looking through a new lens at nursing research.

Authors:  David A Richards; Gunilla Borglin
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.837

4.  Undergraduate nursing education reform in France: from vocational to academic programmes.

Authors:  C Debout; F Chevallier-Darchen; O Petit dit Dariel; M Rothan-Tondeur
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.871

Review 5.  Barriers to evidence-based medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani; Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi; Saber Azami-Aghdash
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 6.  Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices for child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Douglas K Novins; Amy E Green; Rupinder K Legha; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 8.829

7.  Knowledge translation of research findings.

Authors:  Jeremy M Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles; John N Lavis; Sophie J Hill; Janet E Squires
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Implementing research results in clinical practice- the experiences of healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Nanna Kristensen; Camilla Nymann; Hanne Konradsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice among nurses: a self-report survey.

Authors:  Anne Dalheim; Stig Harthug; Roy M Nilsen; Monica W Nortvedt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  An exploration of clinical practice in sites with and without clinical nurse or midwife specialists or advanced nurse practitioners, in Ireland.

Authors:  Imelda Coyne; Catherine M Comiskey; Joan G Lalor; Agnes Higgins; Naomi Elliott; Cecily Begley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.