Damiano Pellegrino-Coppola1, Annique Claringbould1, Maartje Stutvoet1, Dorret I Boomsma2, M Arfan Ikram3, P Eline Slagboom4, Harm-Jan Westra1, Lude Franke5. 1. Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Biological Psychology, Netherlands Twin Register, Amsterdam Public Health research institute and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. ludefranke@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aging is a multifactorial process that affects multiple tissues and is characterized by changes in homeostasis over time, leading to increased morbidity. Whole blood gene expression signatures have been associated with aging and have been used to gain information on its biological mechanisms, which are still not fully understood. However, blood is composed of many cell types whose proportions in blood vary with age. As a result, previously observed associations between gene expression levels and aging might be driven by cell type composition rather than intracellular aging mechanisms. To overcome this, previous aging studies already accounted for major cell types, but the possibility that the reported associations are false positives driven by less prevalent cell subtypes remains. RESULTS: Here, we compared the regression model from our previous work to an extended model that corrects for 33 additional white blood cell subtypes. Both models were applied to whole blood gene expression data from 3165 individuals belonging to the general population (age range of 18-81 years). We evaluated that the new model is a better fit for the data and it identified fewer genes associated with aging (625, compared to the 2808 of the initial model; P ≤ 2.5⨯10-6). Moreover, 511 genes (~ 18% of the 2808 genes identified by the initial model) were found using both models, indicating that the other previously reported genes could be proxies for less abundant cell types. In particular, functional enrichment of the genes identified by the new model highlighted pathways and GO terms specifically associated with platelet activity. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that gene expression analyses in blood strongly benefit from correction for both common and rare blood cell types, and recommend using blood-cell count estimates as standard covariates when studying whole blood gene expression.
BACKGROUND: Aging is a multifactorial process that affects multiple tissues and is characterized by changes in homeostasis over time, leading to increased morbidity. Whole blood gene expression signatures have been associated with aging and have been used to gain information on its biological mechanisms, which are still not fully understood. However, blood is composed of many cell types whose proportions in blood vary with age. As a result, previously observed associations between gene expression levels and aging might be driven by cell type composition rather than intracellular aging mechanisms. To overcome this, previous aging studies already accounted for major cell types, but the possibility that the reported associations are false positives driven by less prevalent cell subtypes remains. RESULTS: Here, we compared the regression model from our previous work to an extended model that corrects for 33 additional white blood cell subtypes. Both models were applied to whole blood gene expression data from 3165 individuals belonging to the general population (age range of 18-81 years). We evaluated that the new model is a better fit for the data and it identified fewer genes associated with aging (625, compared to the 2808 of the initial model; P ≤ 2.5⨯10-6). Moreover, 511 genes (~ 18% of the 2808 genes identified by the initial model) were found using both models, indicating that the other previously reported genes could be proxies for less abundant cell types. In particular, functional enrichment of the genes identified by the new model highlighted pathways and GO terms specifically associated with platelet activity. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that gene expression analyses in blood strongly benefit from correction for both common and rare blood cell types, and recommend using blood-cell count estimates as standard covariates when studying whole blood gene expression.
Authors: Gonneke Willemsen; Eco J C de Geus; Meike Bartels; C E M Toos van Beijsterveldt; Andy I Brooks; G Frederique Estourgie-van Burk; Douglas A Fugman; Chantal Hoekstra; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Kees Kluft; Piet Meijer; Grant W Montgomery; Patrizia Rizzu; David Sondervan; August B Smit; Sabine Spijker; H Eka D Suchiman; Jay A Tischfield; Thomas Lehner; P Eline Slagboom; Dorret I Boomsma Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Daria V Zhernakova; Patrick Deelen; Martijn Vermaat; Maarten van Iterson; Michiel van Galen; Wibowo Arindrarto; Peter van 't Hof; Hailiang Mei; Freerk van Dijk; Harm-Jan Westra; Marc Jan Bonder; Jeroen van Rooij; Marijn Verkerk; P Mila Jhamai; Matthijs Moed; Szymon M Kielbasa; Jan Bot; Irene Nooren; René Pool; Jenny van Dongen; Jouke J Hottenga; Coen D A Stehouwer; Carla J H van der Kallen; Casper G Schalkwijk; Alexandra Zhernakova; Yang Li; Ettje F Tigchelaar; Niek de Klein; Marian Beekman; Joris Deelen; Diana van Heemst; Leonard H van den Berg; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Marleen M J van Greevenbroek; Jan H Veldink; Dorret I Boomsma; Cornelia M van Duijn; Cisca Wijmenga; P Eline Slagboom; Morris A Swertz; Aaron Isaacs; Joyce B J van Meurs; Rick Jansen; Bastiaan T Heijmans; Peter A C 't Hoen; Lude Franke Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Manja Schoenmaker; Anton J M de Craen; Paul H E M de Meijer; Marian Beekman; Gerard J Blauw; P Eline Slagboom; Rudi G J Westendorp Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Robi Tacutu; Daniel Thornton; Emily Johnson; Arie Budovsky; Diogo Barardo; Thomas Craig; Eugene Diana; Gilad Lehmann; Dmitri Toren; Jingwei Wang; Vadim E Fraifeld; João P de Magalhães Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Aviv Regev; Sarah A Teichmann; Eric S Lander; Ido Amit; Christophe Benoist; Ewan Birney; Bernd Bodenmiller; Peter Campbell; Piero Carninci; Menna Clatworthy; Hans Clevers; Bart Deplancke; Ian Dunham; James Eberwine; Roland Eils; Wolfgang Enard; Andrew Farmer; Lars Fugger; Berthold Göttgens; Nir Hacohen; Muzlifah Haniffa; Martin Hemberg; Seung Kim; Paul Klenerman; Arnold Kriegstein; Ed Lein; Sten Linnarsson; Emma Lundberg; Joakim Lundeberg; Partha Majumder; John C Marioni; Miriam Merad; Musa Mhlanga; Martijn Nawijn; Mihai Netea; Garry Nolan; Dana Pe'er; Anthony Phillipakis; Chris P Ponting; Stephen Quake; Wolf Reik; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Joshua Sanes; Rahul Satija; Ton N Schumacher; Alex Shalek; Ehud Shapiro; Padmanee Sharma; Jay W Shin; Oliver Stegle; Michael Stratton; Michael J T Stubbington; Fabian J Theis; Matthias Uhlen; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Allon Wagner; Fiona Watt; Jonathan Weissman; Barbara Wold; Ramnik Xavier; Nir Yosef Journal: Elife Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Sergio Andreu-Sánchez; Geraldine Aubert; Aida Ripoll-Cladellas; Sandra Henkelman; Daria V Zhernakova; Trishla Sinha; Alexander Kurilshikov; Maria Carmen Cenit; Marc Jan Bonder; Lude Franke; Cisca Wijmenga; Jingyuan Fu; Monique G P van der Wijst; Marta Melé; Peter Lansdorp; Alexandra Zhernakova Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2022-06-09