Literature DB >> 33719307

A Wild Allele of Pyrroline-5-Carboxylate Synthase1 Leads to Proline Accumulation in Spikes and Leaves of Barley Contributing to Improved Performance Under Reduced Water Availability.

Felix Frimpong1,2, Carel W Windt1, Dagmar van Dusschoten1, Ali A Naz3, Michael Frei4, Fabio Fiorani1.   

Abstract

Water stress (WS) during spike development strongly affects final grain yield and grain quality in cereals. Proline, an osmoprotectant amino-acid, may contribute to alleviating the effects of cell and tissue dehydration. We studied five spring barley genotypes contrasting in their drought response, including two introgression lines, S42IL-143 and S42IL-141, harboring a Pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase1- P5cs1 allele originating from the wild barley accession ISR42-8. We tested the hypothesis that barley genotypes harboring a wild allele at P5cs1 locus are comparatively more drought-tolerant at the reproductive stage by inducing proline accumulation in their immature spikes. At the booting stage, we subjected plants to well-watered and WS treatments until physiological maturity. Several morpho-physiological traits had significant genotype by treatment interaction and reduction under WS. Varying levels of genotypic proline accumulation and differences in WS tolerance were observed. Spike proline accumulation was higher than leaf proline accumulation for all genotypes under WS. Also, introgression lines carrying a wild allele at P5cs1 locus had a markedly higher spike and leaf proline content compared with the other genotypes. These introgression lines showed milder drought symptoms compared with elite genotypes, remained photosynthetically active under WS, and maintained their intrinsic water use efficiency. These combined responses contributed to the achievement of higher final seed productivity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of whole spikes at the soft dough stage showed an increase in seed abortion among the elite genotypes compared with the introgression lines 15 days after WS treatment. Our results suggest that proline accumulation at the reproductive stage contributes to the maintenance of grain formation under water shortage.
Copyright © 2021 Frimpong, Windt, van Dusschoten, Naz, Frei and Fiorani.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barley; introgression lines; proline accumulation; pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase1; seed yield; water stress

Year:  2021        PMID: 33719307      PMCID: PMC7947243          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.633448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


  51 in total

1.  Quantitative T2 imaging of plant tissues by means of multi-echo MRI microscopy.

Authors:  H T Edzes; D van Dusschoten; H Van As
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  A drought-sensitive barley variety displays oxidative stress and strongly increased contents in low-molecular weight antioxidant compounds during water deficit compared to a tolerant variety.

Authors:  Mohamed Amine Marok; Lionel Tarrago; Brigitte Ksas; Patricia Henri; Ouzna Abrous-Belbachir; Michel Havaux; Pascal Rey
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.549

3.  The up-regulation of proline synthesis in the meristematic tissues of wheat seedlings upon short-term exposure to osmotic stress.

Authors:  Helga Koenigshofer; Hans-Georg Loeppert
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.549

4.  Lower soil moisture threshold for transpiration decline under water deficit correlates with lower canopy conductance and higher transpiration efficiency in drought-tolerant cowpea.

Authors:  Nouhoun Belko; Mainassara Zaman-Allah; Ndiaga Cisse; Ndeye Ndack Diop; Gerard Zombre; Jeffrey D Ehlers; Vincent Vadez
Journal:  Funct Plant Biol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.101

Review 5.  Drought or/and Heat-Stress Effects on Seed Filling in Food Crops: Impacts on Functional Biochemistry, Seed Yields, and Nutritional Quality.

Authors:  Akanksha Sehgal; Kumari Sita; Kadambot H M Siddique; Rakesh Kumar; Sailaja Bhogireddy; Rajeev K Varshney; Bindumadhava HanumanthaRao; Ramakrishnan M Nair; P V Vara Prasad; Harsh Nayyar
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield, and quality.

Authors:  Xiaolong Yang; Benfu Wang; Liang Chen; Ping Li; Cougui Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Genome-wide association mapping in a diverse spring barley collection reveals the presence of QTL hotspots and candidate genes for root and shoot architecture traits at seedling stage.

Authors:  Adel H Abdel-Ghani; Rajiv Sharma; Celestine Wabila; Sidram Dhanagond; Saed J Owais; Mahmud A Duwayri; Saddam A Al-Dalain; Christian Klukas; Dijun Chen; Thomas Lübberstedt; Nicolaus von Wirén; Andreas Graner; Benjamin Kilian; Kerstin Neumann
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 8.  Role of proline and pyrroline-5-carboxylate metabolism in plant defense against invading pathogens.

Authors:  Aarzoo Qamar; Kirankumar S Mysore; Muthappa Senthil-Kumar
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Plant adaptation to drought stress.

Authors:  Supratim Basu; Venkategowda Ramegowda; Anuj Kumar; Andy Pereira
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 10.  Stay-Green Trait: A Prospective Approach for Yield Potential, and Drought and Heat Stress Adaptation in Globally Important Cereals.

Authors:  Nasrein Mohamed Kamal; Yasir Serag Alnor Gorafi; Mostafa Abdelrahman; Eltayb Abdellatef; Hisashi Tsujimoto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Drought Stress Responses: Coping Strategy and Resistance.

Authors:  Hanna Bandurska
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29

2.  Transcriptome and association mapping revealed functional genes respond to drought stress in Populus.

Authors:  Fangyuan Song; Jiaxuan Zhou; Mingyang Quan; Liang Xiao; Wenjie Lu; Shitong Qin; Yuanyuan Fang; Dan Wang; Peng Li; Qingzhang Du; Yousry A El-Kassaby; Deqiang Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.