Kenneth W McKinley1, James M Chamberlain1, Quynh Doan2, Deena Berkowitz1. 1. Emergency Medicine Section of Data Analytics, Children's National, Washington, D.C. 2. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Abstract
Quality improvement efforts can require significant investment before the system impact of those efforts can be evaluated. We used discrete event simulation (DES) modeling to test the theoretical impact of a proposed initiative to reduce diagnostic testing for low-acuity pediatric emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: We modified an existing DES model, built at another large, urban, academic pediatric ED, to forecast the impact of reducing diagnostic testing rates on mean ED length of stay (LOS). The modified model included local testing rates for Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 4 and 5 patients and additional processes defined by local experts. Validation was performed by comparing model output predictions of mean LOS and wait times to actual site-specific data. We determined the goal reduction in diagnostic testing rates using the Achievable Benchmark of Care methodology. Model output mean LOS and wait times, with testing set at benchmark rates, were compared to outputs with testing set at current levels. RESULTS: During validation testing, model output metrics approximated actual clinical data with no statistically significant differences. Compared to model outputs with current testing rates, the mean LOS with testing set at an achievable benchmark was significantly shorter for ESI 4 (difference 19.1 mins [95% confidence interval 12.2, 26.0]) patients. CONCLUSION: A DES model predicted a statistically significant decrease in mean LOS for ESI 4 pediatric ED patients if diagnostic testing is performed at an achievable benchmark rate compared to current rates. DES shows promise as a tool to evaluate the impact of a QI initiative before implementation.
Quality improvement efforts can require significant investment before the system impact of those efforts can be evaluated. We used discrete event simulation (DES) modeling to test the theoretical impact of a proposed initiative to reduce diagnostic testing for low-acuity pediatric emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: We modified an existing DES model, built at another large, urban, academic pediatric ED, to forecast the impact of reducing diagnostic testing rates on mean ED length of stay (LOS). The modified model included local testing rates for Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 4 and 5 patients and additional processes defined by local experts. Validation was performed by comparing model output predictions of mean LOS and wait times to actual site-specific data. We determined the goal reduction in diagnostic testing rates using the Achievable Benchmark of Care methodology. Model output mean LOS and wait times, with testing set at benchmark rates, were compared to outputs with testing set at current levels. RESULTS: During validation testing, model output metrics approximated actual clinical data with no statistically significant differences. Compared to model outputs with current testing rates, the mean LOS with testing set at an achievable benchmark was significantly shorter for ESI 4 (difference 19.1 mins [95% confidence interval 12.2, 26.0]) patients. CONCLUSION: A DES model predicted a statistically significant decrease in mean LOS for ESI 4 pediatric ED patients if diagnostic testing is performed at an achievable benchmark rate compared to current rates. DES shows promise as a tool to evaluate the impact of a QI initiative before implementation.
Authors: Matthew Harris Rutberg; Sharon Wenczel; John Devaney; Eric Jonathan Goldlust; Theodore Eugene Day Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: John C Moskop; Joel M Geiderman; Kenneth D Marshall; Jolion McGreevy; Arthur R Derse; Kelly Bookman; Norine McGrath; Kenneth V Iserson Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Malcolm B Doupe; Dan Chateau; Alecs Chochinov; Ellen Weber; Jennifer E Enns; Shelley Derksen; Joykrishna Sarkar; Michael Schull; Ricardo Lobato de Faria; Alan Katz; Ruth-Ann Soodeen Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Terri L Byczkowski; Michael Fitzgerald; Stephanie Kennebeck; Lisa Vaughn; Kurt Myers; Andrea Kachelmeyer; Nathan Timm Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-06-17 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Helena Hvitfeldt-Forsberg; Pamela Mazzocato; Daniel Glaser; Christina Keller; Maria Unbeck Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jesús Isaac Vázquez-Serrano; Rodrigo E Peimbert-García; Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 3.390