Kai Wu1, Jinming Liu1, Renata Saha1, Chaoyi Peng1, Diqing Su2, Yongqiang Andrew Wang3, Jian-Ping Wang1. 1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States. 2. Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States. 3. Ocean NanoTech, LLC, San Diego, California 92126, United States.
Abstract
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have been extensively used as tiny heating sources in magnetic hyperthermia therapy, contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging, tracers in magnetic particle imaging, carriers for drug/gene delivery, etc. There have emerged many MNP/microbead suppliers since the past decade, such as Ocean NanoTech, Nanoprobes, US Research Nanomaterials, Miltenyi Biotec, micromod Partikeltechnologie GmbH, nanoComposix, and so forth. In this paper, we report the physical and magnetic characterizations on iron oxide nanoparticle products from Ocean NanoTech. Standard characterization tools such as vibrating-sample magnetometry, X-ray diffraction, dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, and zeta potential analysis are used to provide MNP customers and researchers with an overview of these iron oxide nanoparticle products. In addition, the dynamic magnetic responses of these iron oxide nanoparticles in aqueous solutions are investigated under low- and high-frequency alternating magnetic fields, giving a standardized operating procedure for characterizing the MNPs from Ocean NanoTech, thereby yielding the best of MNPs for different applications.
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have been extensively used as tiny heating sources in magnetic hyperthermia therapy, contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging, tracers in magnetic particle imaging, carriers for drug/gene delivery, etc. There have emerged many MNP/microbead suppliers since the past decade, such as Ocean NanoTech, Nanoprobes, US Research Nanomaterials, Miltenyi Biotec, micromod Partikeltechnologie GmbH, nanoComposix, and so forth. In this paper, we report the physical and magnetic characterizations on iron oxide nanoparticle products from Ocean NanoTech. Standard characterization tools such as vibrating-sample magnetometry, X-ray diffraction, dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, and zeta potential analysis are used to provide MNP customers and researchers with an overview of these iron oxide nanoparticle products. In addition, the dynamic magnetic responses of these iron oxide nanoparticles in aqueous solutions are investigated under low- and high-frequency alternating magnetic fields, giving a standardized operating procedure for characterizing the MNPs from Ocean NanoTech, thereby yielding the best of MNPs for different applications.
Magnetic
nanoparticles (MNPs) are nanomaterials with sizes between
1 and 100 nm. Due to their large surface-to-volume ratio and tunable
magnetic properties, MNPs have emerged as one of the most important
nanomaterials in magnetic, chemical, and biomedical applications.
The surface of the MNPs can be functionalized with various coatings
from inorganic coatings such as silica[1] and carbon[2] to organic coatings such
as polyethylene glycol[3] and dopamine.[4] Compared to non-magnetic particles, MNPs can
be manipulated by an external magnetic field without any physical
contact, which leads to various applications such as drug delivery[5] as well as the separation and concentration of
certain molecules.[6] Under an alternating
magnetic field, MNPs can induce a localized temperature increase at
the target spot, which makes them promising candidates for hyperthermia
applications.[7] Under an external magnetic
field, MNPs can generate stray fields. By integrating with various
magnetic sensors such as magnetoresistance sensors,[8,9] hall
sensors,[10,11] nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) sensors,[11] magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),[12] and magnetic particle spectroscopy (MPS),[13] MNPs can also serve as magnetic markers in diagnostic
applications.To date, MNPs with various sizes and surface coatings
have been
successfully commercialized and are available in many companies such
as Ocean NanoTech (San Diego, USA), Nanoprobes (New York City, USA),
US Research Nanomaterials (Houston, USA), Miltenyi Biotec (Bergisch
Gladbach, Germany), micromod Partikeltechnologie GmbH (Rostock, Germany),
nanoComposix (San Diego, USA), and so forth. For these aforementioned
applications, the quest for a high magnetic moment, uniform size distribution,
and colloidal stability of MNPs has pushed the development of various
nanoparticle manufacturers. In this paper, we first characterized
the magnetic and physical properties of single-core, differently sized
iron oxide nanoparticle products from Ocean NanoTech using vibrating-sample
magnetometry (VSM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), dynamic light scattering
(DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and zeta potential
analysis (summarized in Table ). In addition, we give application-oriented assessments on
these MNP products using a home-built MPS system. Practical suggestions
on the applications of these iron oxide nanoparticles with varying
core sizes are given at the end of this paper to maximize the use
of them.
Table 1
Physical and Magnetic Properties of
SHA Series MNPs
sample
average sizea (nm) ± SD
zeta potential (mV) ± SD
specific
magnetization (emu/g Fe)b,c
specific
magnetization (emu/g)c,d
magnetic
moment per particle (emu/particle)c
material
SHA-5
10.46 ± 3.88
–0.03 ± 0.005
63.84
∼44.69
1.54 × 10–17
γ-Fe2O3, Fe3O4
SHA-10
18.07 ± 4.72
5.03 ± 0.07
42.64
∼29.85
8.23 × 10–17
γ-Fe2O3, Fe3O4
SHA-15
20.69 ± 6.31
7.66 ± 0.05
83.44
∼58.41
5.13 × 10–16
γ-Fe2O3, Fe3O4
SHA-20
27.56 ± 11.29
–0.41 ± 0.33
78.08
∼54.66
1.18 × 10–15
γ-Fe2O3, Fe3O4
SHA-25
28.28 ± 10.38
1.15 ± 0.49
55.28
∼38.70
1.58 × 10–15
γ-Fe2O3, Fe3O4
SHA-30
32.60 ± 12.17
–0.69 ± 0.04
51.12
∼35.78
2.50 × 10–15
γ-Fe2O3, Fe3O4
The average hydrodynamic sizes of
SHA series MNPs are based on number-weighted DLS distribution.
The specific magnetization (emu/g
Fe) is calculated under a 5000 Oe field.
The specific magnetization (unit:
emu/g Fe, emu/g) and magnetic moment per particle (unit: emu/particle)
are calculated under a 5000 Oe field based on the nanoparticle concentrations
provided by Ocean NanoTech. The concertation of Fe is 5 mg/mL for
all SHA series MNPs, while the concentrations of nanoparticles are
34.5, 4.3, 1.35, 0.55, 0.29, and 0.17 nmol/mL for SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15,
SHA-20, SHA-25, and SHA-30, respectively.
The specific magnetization (emu/g),
that is, the magnetic moment per gram of iron oxide nanoparticle is
calculated by assuming that iron holds 70% of the nanoparticle weight.
The average hydrodynamic sizes of
SHA series MNPs are based on number-weighted DLS distribution.The specific magnetization (emu/g
Fe) is calculated under a 5000 Oe field.The specific magnetization (unit:
emu/g Fe, emu/g) and magnetic moment per particle (unit: emu/particle)
are calculated under a 5000 Oe field based on the nanoparticle concentrations
provided by Ocean NanoTech. The concertation of Fe is 5 mg/mL for
all SHA series MNPs, while the concentrations of nanoparticles are
34.5, 4.3, 1.35, 0.55, 0.29, and 0.17 nmol/mL for SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15,
SHA-20, SHA-25, and SHA-30, respectively.The specific magnetization (emu/g),
that is, the magnetic moment per gram of iron oxide nanoparticle is
calculated by assuming that iron holds 70% of the nanoparticle weight.
Results
and Discussion
Magnetic Properties of
SHA Series MNPs
The hysteresis curves of SHA series MNPs
are recorded by VSM under
field ranges of −5000 to 5000, −500 to 500, and −200
to 200 Oe. The magnetic moment per volume of MNP suspension is averaged
over 25 μL of the MNP sample and plotted in Figure a–c, with SHA-5, SHA-10,
SHA-15, and SHA-20 being superparamagnetic. We also observed coercivities
from SHA-25 and SHA-30. Due to the varying particle concentrations
in SHA series MNP products (listed in Table ), the magnetic moment per volume is not
comprehensive to represent the magnetic property of each MNP. In addition,
the magnetic moment per particle is also summarized in Figure d–f, with SHA-30 showing
the highest magnetic moment per particle, followed by SHA-25, SHA-20,
SHA-15, SHA-10, and SHA-5 showing the lowest magnetic moment per particle.
Under a field strength of 5000 Oe, the specific magnetizations (calculated
from the magnetic moment per gram of Fe, unit: emu/g Fe) from the
highest to the lowest are SHA-15 > SHA-20 > SHA-5 > SHA-25
> SHA-30
> SHA-10, as shown in Figure h,i. Note that the magnetization of SHA-5 is not saturated
at 5000 Oe, while the remaining SHA series MNPs are saturated. Thus,
we use specific magnetization instead of saturation magnetization
here. Due to the surface spin canting effect (also called the magnetically
anomalous shell or magnetically dead layer) of nanoparticles, the
specific magnetizations of MNPs are always lower than that of the
bulk material. Herein, the specific magnetizations of SHA series MNPs
are lower than the ideal values of bulk γ-Fe2O3 (60–80 emu/g) and Fe3O4 (92–100
emu/g) materials.[15−19]
Figure 1
Magnetization
curves of SHA series MNPs obtained by VSM at 20 °C.
External field sweeps from (a,d,g) −5000 to +5000 Oe, (b,e,h)
−500 to +500 Oe, and (c,f,i) −200 to +200 Oe. Magnetization
units are represented by emu/μL, emu/particle, and emu/g Fe
for (a–c), (d–f), and (g–i), respectively.
Magnetization
curves of SHA series MNPs obtained by VSM at 20 °C.
External field sweeps from (a,d,g) −5000 to +5000 Oe, (b,e,h)
−500 to +500 Oe, and (c,f,i) −200 to +200 Oe. Magnetization
units are represented by emu/μL, emu/particle, and emu/g Fe
for (a–c), (d–f), and (g–i), respectively.Since the magnetic moment of each particle increases
with the cube
of its magnetic core diameter (or radius), in the ideal case where
these SHA series MNPs show similar specific magnetization, the magnetic
moment per particle should show a similar trend to the core diameter.
However, we do not see the trend of increasing specific magnetizations
(under a 5000 Oe field) in SHA series MNPs as the magnetic core size
increases, which might be caused by the insufficient oxygenation for
larger magnetic core sizes. Thus, as the insufficient oxygenation
effect dominates, the SHA-15 MNPs show the highest specific magnetization,
and it decreases with increasing core size as seen in Table .The crystal structure
of SHA series MNPs is characterized via XRD
(Bruker D8 Discover 2D), as shown in Figure . It is observed that Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 are the main phases
in SHA series MNPs. There are also several diffraction peaks from
the solution denoted by the blue dashed lines in Figure . The sharp diffraction peaks
(labeled by black diamonds) come from the chemicals in the MNP buffer
(NaCl, KCl, Na2HPO4, KH2PO4, etc), and the peaks labeled by black rounds come from the Si/SiO2 substrate. The full width at half-maximum of the diffraction
peaks is wider for the MNPs compared to their bulk counterparts. The
broadening effects are due to the decreased grain size for nanoparticles.
Figure 2
XRD patterns
of SHA series MNPs. The powder diffraction files of
FeO, Fe3O4, α-Fe2O3, and γ-Fe2O3 are added for references.
XRD patterns
of SHA series MNPs. The powder diffraction files of
FeO, Fe3O4, α-Fe2O3, and γ-Fe2O3 are added for references.
Hydrodynamic Size and Morphological
Characterizations
on SHA Series MNPs
Figure a–f shows the hydrodynamic size distributions
of samples SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15, SHA-20, SHA-25, and SHA-30 with
mean values of 10.46, 18.07, 20.69, 27.56, 28.28, and 32.6 nm, respectively.
The average hydrodynamic sizes of SHA series MNPs are summarized in Table . The SHA series MNPs
have two organic coating layers: one monolayer of oleic acid and another
monolayer of the amphiphilic polymer. The total thickness of the organic
layer coating is about 4 nm. This causes the hydrodynamic size of
the nanoparticles to be about 8–10 nm larger than their inorganic
core size measured by TEM (see Figure ). In this respect, the mean values for DLS in the
SHA series show quite a satisfactory trend and good agreement with
the TEM results; the results are arranged in ascending order of their
sizes in Figure .
Figure 3
DLS number-weighted
distributions of the hydrodynamic size of MNPs
from samples (a) SHA-5, (b) SHA-10, (c) SHA-15, (d) SHA-20, (e) SHA-25,
and (f) SHA-30 as characterized by DLS. In each figure, the solid
green lines are the fitted log-normal distribution curves and the
solid red lines are the cumulative distribution curves. The μ
values represent the statistical mean of the hydrodynamic sizes of
the samples. The standard deviation and R2 values are represented by σ and R2, respectively, for each case.
Figure 4
TEM images
of SHA series MNPs. (a–f) SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15,
SHA-20, SHA-25, and SHA-30, respectively. Scale bars represent 20
nm. TEM images of SHA series MNPs under different magnifications are
given in S5 from the Supporting Information.
DLS number-weighted
distributions of the hydrodynamic size of MNPs
from samples (a) SHA-5, (b) SHA-10, (c) SHA-15, (d) SHA-20, (e) SHA-25,
and (f) SHA-30 as characterized by DLS. In each figure, the solid
green lines are the fitted log-normal distribution curves and the
solid red lines are the cumulative distribution curves. The μ
values represent the statistical mean of the hydrodynamic sizes of
the samples. The standard deviation and R2 values are represented by σ and R2, respectively, for each case.TEM images
of SHA series MNPs. (a–f) SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15,
SHA-20, SHA-25, and SHA-30, respectively. Scale bars represent 20
nm. TEM images of SHA series MNPs under different magnifications are
given in S5 from the Supporting Information.The magnetic core morphologies
of SHA series MNPs are shown in Figure . Some MNPs are agglomerated
during the evaporation process of the MNP suspensions. For the MNPs
with smaller sizes such as samples SHA-5 and SHA-10, the magnetic
core shapes are not strictly spherical, which might cause higher shape
anisotropies as well as higher effective magnetic anisotropies in
these MNPs. However, larger MNPs show spherical magnetic cores. The
contrast of different MNPs from one TEM image is due to the different
crystal orientations. When the crystal zone axis is close to the incident
electron beam, the MNPs show a darker color.
Zeta
Potential of SHA Series MNPs
The SHA series MNPs have a neutral
to slightly alkaline pH between
7.2 and 7.6. The measured zeta potential values for SHA-5, SHA-10,
SHA-15, SHA-20, SHA-25, and SHA-30 are −0.03, +5.03, +7.66,
−0.41, +1.15, and −0.69 mV, respectively.
Dynamic Magnetic Responses of SHA Series MNPs
under a Low-Frequency Driving Field
The dynamic magnetic
responses of SHA series MNPs under a mono-frequency driving field
are investigated. The driving field frequency is varied from 50 to
2850 Hz, and the field amplitude is set at 170 Oe (Gauss).[20,20−27] Each plastic vial containing 200 μL of SHA series MNPs in
10 nM PBS and 0.03% NaN3 is placed under the alternating
magnetic field for MPS measurements. For MNPs suspended in liquid
solution under an external magnetic field, they undergo two distinct
relaxation mechanisms by which the magnetic moments rotate in response
to the field: the Néel relaxation is the flipping of the magnetic
moment between easy axes inside a stationary MNP, and on the other
hand, the Brownian relaxation is the physical rotation of the entire
MNP along with its magnetic moment. In principle, both relaxation
mechanisms play important roles in determining the dynamic magnetic
responses of MNPs in suspension when subjected to the alternating
magnetic field. Depending on the magnetic properties (such as effective
anisotropy constant and saturation magnetization),[28,29] the physical properties (magnetic core size and the hydrodynamic
size including the polymer coatings and anchored biological compounds
such as proteins, peptides, cells, and so forth) of MNPs,[15,21,30−35] the nanoparticle volume fraction of the suspension (i.e., dipolar
interactions),[15,36−38] and the physical
properties of the suspension (temperature and viscosity),[22,23,39−46] MNPs could undergo either Néel or Brownian process-dominated
relaxation. It has been reported that for a system of non-interacting
iron oxide nanoparticles with negligible polymer coatings, the magnetic
dynamics will be dominated by the Brownian process when the core size
is above 15 nm and the Néel process dominates when the core
size is below 15 nm[39,47−49] (see S7 from
the Supporting Information).Under
a low-frequency driving field (f < 500 Hz), magnetic
moments of SHA series MNPs with diameters from 5 to 30 nm are able
to follow the time-varying magnetic field. As shown in S8 from the Supporting Information, all the six SHA series
MNPs show similar phase angles to the driving field (f < 500 Hz), and as the field frequency increases, the differences
in the phase angles between six samples increase. Larger MNPs with
a larger effective relaxation time show a larger phase lag to the
driving field.As summarized in Figure , under a low-frequency driving field, the
dynamic magnetic
responses of six SHA series MNPs from the strongest to the weakest
are SHA-30 > SHA-20 > SHA-15 > SHA-25 > SHA-10 > SHA-5. Figure a–c summarizes
the amplitudes
measured at the third, fifth, and seventh harmonics, respectively. Figure d–f highlights
the corresponding harmonic amplitudes under driving field frequencies
of 350, 650, 1250, and 1850 Hz.
Figure 5
Harmonics generated by SHA series MNPs
under a low-frequency driving
field. (a–c) Third, fifth, and seventh harmonic amplitudes
of SHA series MNPs under different driving field frequencies. (d–f)
Harmonic amplitudes at driving field frequencies of 350, 650, 1250,
and 1850 Hz.
Harmonics generated by SHA series MNPs
under a low-frequency driving
field. (a–c) Third, fifth, and seventh harmonic amplitudes
of SHA series MNPs under different driving field frequencies. (d–f)
Harmonic amplitudes at driving field frequencies of 350, 650, 1250,
and 1850 Hz.Figure summarizes
the real-time voltage signal obtained from pickup coils at driving
field frequencies of 350, 950, and 1850 Hz. The extracted harmonics
are plotted along with the total signal in real time. MNPs with stronger
dynamic magnetic responses to the driving field generate larger harmonic
signals and are thus able to cause the distortions in the total signal
(the highlighted dark areas in Figure ). It is observed that SHA-30 and SHA-20 show the strongest
dynamic magnetic responses to the low-frequency driving field, followed
by SHA-15 and SHA-25. SHA-5 and SHA-10 show negligible dynamic magnetic
responses compared to the former SHA series MNPs, which are mainly
due to the low magnetic moments and linear magnetization curves, as
shown in Figure .
Figure 6
Recorded
real-time dynamic magnetic responses of SHA series MNPs
under a low-frequency driving field. The higher harmonics are extracted
and plotted in parallel with the total signal obtained from the pickup
coils. [(a,d,g,j,m,p)], [(b,e,h,k,n,q)], and [(c,f,i,l,o,r)] are the
real-time total signal and higher harmonics under driving field frequencies
of 350, 950, and 1850 Hz for samples SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15, SHA-20,
SHA-25, and SHA-30, respectively. A zoom-in view of the higher harmonics
is plotted in S9 from the Supporting Information.
Recorded
real-time dynamic magnetic responses of SHA series MNPs
under a low-frequency driving field. The higher harmonics are extracted
and plotted in parallel with the total signal obtained from the pickup
coils. [(a,d,g,j,m,p)], [(b,e,h,k,n,q)], and [(c,f,i,l,o,r)] are the
real-time total signal and higher harmonics under driving field frequencies
of 350, 950, and 1850 Hz for samples SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15, SHA-20,
SHA-25, and SHA-30, respectively. A zoom-in view of the higher harmonics
is plotted in S9 from the Supporting Information.
Dynamic
Magnetic Responses of SHA Series MNPs
under a High-Frequency Driving Field
In this section, we
report the dynamic magnetic responses of SHA series MNPs under high-frequency
driving fields. A dual-frequency method is used herein; one excitation
field is set at 10 Hz and a magnitude of 170 Oe, and the other high-frequency
driving field is set at varying frequencies (from 1 to 20 kHz) and
a magnitude of 17 Oe.[13,30,39,47,50−52]Under a high-frequency driving field, larger MNPs (i.e., SHA-30)
are unable to rotate their magnetic moments to the fast-switching
magnetic field; thus, their dynamic magnetic responses are weakened.
As shown in S10 from the Supporting Information, there is a constant harmonic phase difference of 50° between
SHA-10 and SHA-30 MNPs. As a result, under a high-frequency driving
field, the dynamic magnetic responses of six SHA series MNPs from
the strongest to the weakest are SHA-15 > SHA-20 > SHA-30>
SHA-25
> SHA-10 > SHA-5 (as shown in Figure ).
Figure 7
Harmonics generated by SHA series MNPs under
a high-frequency driving
field. (a–c) Third, fifth, and seventh harmonic amplitudes
of SHA series MNPs under different driving field frequencies. (d–f)
Harmonic amplitudes at driving field frequencies of 3, 5, 10, and
20 kHz.
Harmonics generated by SHA series MNPs under
a high-frequency driving
field. (a–c) Third, fifth, and seventh harmonic amplitudes
of SHA series MNPs under different driving field frequencies. (d–f)
Harmonic amplitudes at driving field frequencies of 3, 5, 10, and
20 kHz.Although recent in origin, MNPs
of different core sizes have found
their applications in various fields of science. This section of the
paper is dedicated to identifying the utility of the different-sized
and surface-functionalized MNPs in realistic applications. The SHA
series particles are amine-functionalized MNPs. As the amine groups
are less selective and less specific for antibodies and proteins,
they capture a varied range of bacterial pathogens and allow purification
of water, food, and urine samples.[53] The
VSM characterization of the SHA series in Figure a–f shows that SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15,
and SHA-20 are superparamagnetic. Although SHA-25 and SHA-30 show
higher magnetic moments, they show remanent magnetizations. For magnetic
biosensing, higher-moment particles are preferred in order to generate
a higher magnetic signal per particle. However, practical limitations
such as colloidal stability (no clustering) should also be considered.
For the SHA series, SHA-25 exhibits the second highest magnetic moment/particle
with a remanent magnetization of 1.28% M, where M is the specific magnetization under 5000 Oe. Although
SHA-30 has a higher magnetic moment/particle compared to SHA-25, a
much larger remanence magnetization of 10.93% M is
observed from SHA-30. Taking both magnetic moments and remanent magnetizations
into consideration, SHA-25 is the optimum candidate from SHA series
for biosensing applications. On a different note, for cell separation
and sorting and drug/gene delivery, as the property of superparamagnetism
is not essential and a higher magnetic moment ensures a larger magnetic
torque (force), the highest-magnetic-moment MNP, SHA-30, is probably
a better candidate.For homogeneous bioassays that are based
on a conjugation-mediated
change in Brownian relaxation time, MNPs should be thermally blocked.[13,54−59] Thus, an in-depth study on the Brownian and Néel relaxation
times of these MNPs under different driving fields should be carried
out.[60,61] For magnetic hyperthermia therapy, the dissipated
energy or specific absorption rate (SAR) is directly proportional
to the imaginary component of AC susceptibility and saturation magnetization
(Ms) of MNPs, the applied field frequency,
and the amplitude squared.[62−66] Thus, a high Ms of MNPs does not guarantee
a high SAR, and practical measurements on the hyperthermia performance
are required to find out which SHA series MNPs are better suited for
hyperthermia applications.Furthermore, MRI techniques require
the MNPs to be injected into
the body fluids which then accumulate in the target tissues. Hence,
for MRI applications, it is extremely essential for the MNPs to be
small as larger MNPs have greater tendency to block the arteries.
In this case, SHA-5 and SHA-10 MNPs will be quite useful.[67] The dynamic magnetic responses of SHA series
MNPs are compared in this paper using a homebuilt MPS system. The
harmonics are induced under different driving magnetic fields, which
are a result of the joint effects of relaxation mechanisms and the
magnetic moment of each MNP. For magnetic particle imaging (MPI) and
MPS-based bioassays, larger dynamic magnetic responses (higher harmonic
amplitudes) ensure a higher signal-to-noise ratio and sensitivity.
Thus, SHA-30 MNPs are suggested for MPI and MPS-based bioassays where
the driving field frequencies are below 2 kHz, while SHA-15 MNPs are
suggested for these applications where the driving field frequencies
are above 2 kHz.
Conclusions
In this
paper, we characterized the magnetic and physical properties
of SHA series MNPs from Ocean NanoTech using standard characterization
tools. The VSM results show that SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15, and SHA-20
MNPs are superparamagnetic and on the other hand, SHA-25 and SHA-30
are not superparamagnetic, with SHA-30 showing the highest magnetic
moment per particle, followed by SHA-25, SHA-20, SHA-15, SHA-10, and
SHA-5. Thus, SHA series iron oxide nanoparticles with larger core
sizes are preferred for magnetic biosensing and drug delivery where
high-moment MNPs are desired for higher magnetic signals and higher
magnetic torques. However, SHA-25 and SHA-30 show remnant magnetizations
upon the removal of the magnetic field (non-superparamagnetic), and
thus, they are not applicable for applications where superparamagnetism
is required. The XRD results show that all SHA series MNPs are composed
of γ-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4. The dynamic magnetic responses of these iron oxide nanoparticles
are investigated using a homebuilt MPS system, where both the responses
under low and high driving field frequencies are summarized. It is
observed that under low driving field frequencies, the dynamic magnetic
responses of SHA series MNPs from the strongest to the weakest are
SHA-30 > SHA-20 > SHA-15 > SHA-25 > SHA-10 > SHA-5.
However, under
high driving field frequencies, due to the larger phase lags of larger
MNPs, the dynamic magnetic responses from the strongest to the weakest
are modified: SHA-15 > SHA-20 > SHA-30> SHA-25 > SHA-10
> SHA-5. These
results give hints on designing MPI and MPS-based bioassays to maximize
the use of different MNPs of different core sizes. At the end of this
paper, based on the requirements and goals of MNP-based applications,
we suggested different SHA MNPs for each application.
Materials and Methods
Materials
The
SHA series MNPs are
provided by Ocean NanoTech. Six SHA series MNPs with average magnetic
core sizes of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 nm are characterized in this
paper (denoted as SHA-5, SHA-10, SHA-15, SHA-20, SHA-25, and SHA-30,
respectively; photographs of SHA series MNPs used in this work can
be found in the Supporting Information,
S1). The SHA series MNPs are a group of water-soluble iron oxide nanoparticles
coated with the amphiphilic polymer and functionalized amine reactive
groups. They are very stable in most buffers in the pH range of 4–10
and can be readily conjugated to proteins, peptides, and other carboxylic
acid-containing molecules.
VSM Measurement
25 μL of the
SHA series MNP suspension is pipetted onto a filter paper and air-dried
before the VSM measurements. Three independent magnetization curves
of each sample are obtained at 20 °C, with the external magnetic
field swept from −5000 to +5000 Oe (a field step of 10 Oe and
an averaging time of 200 ms), −500 to +500 Oe (a field step
of 2 Oe and an averaging time of 200 ms), and −200 to +200
Oe (a field step of 1 Oe and an averaging time of 200 ms).
XRD Measurement
50 μL of the
SHA series MNP suspension is pipetted onto a Si/SiO2 slide
and air-dried before the XRD characterization. A cobalt radiation
source (wavelength ∼1.79 Å) is used for the XRD characterization
since it has lower fluorescence, especially for magnetite and maghemite.[14] For a convenient comparison, the characterized
XRD patterns are converted to copper radiation. The crystal structure
of SHA series MNPs is characterized via XRD (Bruker D8 Discover 2D).
DLS Measurement
The hydrodynamic
size distribution of the SHA series MNPs is characterized using a
DLS Particle Tracking Analyzer (model: Microtac Nanoflex). 100 μL
of the SHA series MNP suspension is diluted in 1.4 mL of deionized
(DI) water, reaching a total sample volume of 1.5 mL of the mixture,
followed by ultrasonication for 30 min before the DLS characterization.
TEM Analysis
The morphologies of
these SHA series MNPs are characterized using a TEM system (FEI T12
120 kV). Each TEM sample is prepared by putting a droplet (∼10
μL) of the MNP suspension onto a TEM grid (copper mesh coated
with an amorphous carbon film). These samples are ready for TEM characterization
when the solutions are fully evaporated at room temperature in air.
Zeta Potential Measurement
A zeta
potential analyzer (model: Stabino) is used to characterize the particle
charge distribution or the zeta potential of the SHA series MNPs in
DI water. 100 μL of SHA series MNPs is diluted in 4.9 mL of
DI water, reaching a total sample volume of 5 mL, followed by ultrasonication
for 30 min, and then used for zeta potential characterization. This
particle charge characterization helps to analyze the surface binding
capabilities of these SHA series MNPs.
MPS Measurement
The dynamic magnetic
responses of SHA series MNPs are characterized using a homebuilt MPS
system (see the schematic view and photographs of the MPS system in
S2 and S3 from the Supporting Information). 200 μL of the SHA series MNP sample is sealed in a plastic
vial (a maximum capacity of 300 μL). Two sets of copper coils
are used to generate sinusoidal magnetic fields with tunable frequencies
and magnitudes. One pair of differentially wound pickup coils (600
windings clockwise and 600 windings counter-clockwise) collects the
induced voltage signals due to the dynamic magnetic responses of MNPs
under driving magnetic fields. A laptop with LabVIEW controls the
frequency and magnitude of the driving magnetic field through a data
acquisition card (DAQ, NI USB-6289). The analog voltage signals are
sent back from pickup coils to DAQ, sampled at 500 kHz, and converted
to the frequency domain after discrete Fourier transform. For each
MPS measurement, the MPS system runs for 10 s to collect the baseline
signal (noise), followed by inserting the vial containing the MNP
sample for another 10 s of signal (total) collection. The induced
voltage due to dynamic magnetic responses of MNPs is recovered from
the total signal by the phasor theory (see S4 from the Supporting Information). The higher harmonics
specific to dynamic magnetic responses of MNPs are extracted for analysis
(see S6 from the Supporting Information).
Authors: K Aledealat; G Mihajlović; K Chen; M Field; G J Sullivan; P Xiong; P B Chase; S von Molnár Journal: J Magn Magn Mater Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Diqing Su; Kai Wu; Venkatramana D Krishna; Todd Klein; Jinming Liu; Yinglong Feng; Andres M Perez; Maxim C-J Cheeran; Jian-Ping Wang Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Stefan Achtsnicht; Ali Mohammad Pourshahidi; Andreas Offenhäusser; Hans-Joachim Krause Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Stefan Achtsnicht; Christian Neuendorf; Tobias Faßbender; Greta Nölke; Andreas Offenhäusser; Hans-Joachim Krause; Florian Schröper Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 3.240